I was honestly not nearly as offended by this in the end as I expected. Clearly, I would prefer it had been made by Romero or at least someone involved in the original series of zombie flicks (Tom Savini, perhaps), or not at all. Clearly, the gore effects simply aren’t comparable to anything in Romero’s originals. But, I don’t know … it somehow flows for me, it doesn’t remotely threaten the integrity of the official releases, and it actually tries to do its own thing. Why they thought it necessary to use the Day of the Dead brand is anyone’s guess, except of course the monitary value of it. The abrupt ending is a little weird, too. But compared to what I expected, this was almost a pleasant surprise.
Posts Tagged ‘zombies’
Dawn of the Dead (2004)
Wednesday, August 11th, 2004I thought I was going to have to heavily update this review after watching it again the other day, but now I read it over again and I can’t understand why I rated it so highly before, because basically, all the below still applies, only now it’s in my worst 5 movies of the year list. I would still say it’s worth watching once, with the volume up loud etc, because it has a one-hit kick to it. But anymore would be foolhardy. Not even a dustmark on the original’s negative.
As expected, this remake had no chance of living up to the original for me. For a moment though, I was thrown – the first 10 minutes or so, pre-credits, are downright perfect, and show how much can be achieved without heavy blood-letting and bad language, and how much potential this first time director, Zack Snyder, may have. But it’s downhill pretty much from the start of the opening credits.
The problem with this movie for me, I think, lies in the fact that it assumes nothing of the audience. Some might find this somehow praiseworthy – there has been a remake of the “prequel”, Night of the Living Dead, which sets up the zombies being “born” but it was in 1990, 14 years ago. So I guess the film makers figured they might have some zombie newbies in the audience and decided to make all the characters zombie newbies too. I really don’t think it works. Even the original Dawn of the Dead was made a decade after its prequel. George Romero dealt with explaining the zombies (in particular stuff like, how to kill them, and that it’s the bites that kill and resurrect) in the opening news sequences, a device that’s present in the remake but isn’t used the same way. So we end up with, basically, stupid characters, unless you happen to know nothing about the zombies.
I had to stifle a laugh as soon as I saw the pregnant girl as part of the main group… I mean, you just know how that’s going to turn out. But that alone isn’t enough – it has to be the most unconvincing pregnancy I’ve ever seen on film too. The baby turns out to be one of the worst visual effects in the movie, and the whole character could be happily excised from the screenplay as far as I’m concerned.
I need to get the screenplay out of the way because it’s the movie’s biggest failing. There’s a guy across the street from our main gang in the mall and throughout the movie he communicates by writing messages on a whiteboard which he holds up for Ving Rhames to read through his binoculars. At the beginning, he writes “Andy – alone” on the board by way of introduction. Then Rhames (or whoever it is who’s looking through the binoculars – I think it’s one of the others actually) has to turn to the others and say, just to clarify, “His name is Andy. He’s alone.” Now, fair enough, it had to be said because the others don’t have binoculars… but it’s just such an unwieldy moment. Then there are the action movie clichés – an ending straight out of “The A-Team”, and a doubter of the plan saying, “Let me get this straight, you wanna…. [blah blah difficult and ridiculous plan]…” to which the others go, “Yup… yep… pretty much,” and he responds, “Okay. I’m in.” There must have been hundreds of better Dawn of the Dead remake scripts out there, I don’t know why the hell this one was picked.
But that’s the screenplay. Snyder does his best with what he has. The actors are all as good as can be expected for a horror movie. Ving Rhames gets some nice lines and delivers them in his inimitable manner (“Go in the cubicle, say five hail Mary’s, wipe yo’ ass and you’re good with God,”) and there’s plenty of freaky looking faces plus a few cameos for original fans. The music is very different from the original but works with the very different visuals. Saving Private Ryan style fast film stock (I think it’s fast film stock, I always forget how the effect is achieved, I just flick my video camera into sports mode…) is used to interesting effect and increasingly towards the finale. And there’s a nice idea of telling the “after-story” while the end credits roll.
This will make a good night out for today’s young people who want a really quick fix and buckets of blood (boy, when did I get so old?) But it won’t last out the original, and won’t even last out other recent horror remakes like The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and The Ring. Its problem really is, it’s too stupid.
Shaun of the Dead
Wednesday, April 21st, 2004Second viewing note: I don’t yet feel ready to rewrite the below review, I’ll wait till I get the DVD, but I did get to see this movie again recently and would add that, unlike Kill Bill: Vol. 2 which I watched for the second time on the same day as this second viewing, this wasn’t so much better the second time. As many jokes fall flat as those that split the sides. The way I’d put it is, this movie is much better when you’re thinking back on it with a friend, thinking of all the good parts, than while you’re watching when you have to put up with the uncomfortable silences when it’s not so great. But its moments do still hold it high above other movies I’ve seen so far this year (‘cept Vol. 2 which I will be re-reviewing when I’ve the time for the detailed analysis it deserves…)
As this movie is on release, it almost looks when you go to the cinema like you have this big taking sides thing going on – the “official”, pumped-up, American remake of the classic 1978 Romero movie, or this seemingly spoof-like British “comedy”? My advice first of all is, if you have a weak stomach, don’t think you’ll get off lighter if you go to the “comedy” option… plus don’t expect any kind of spoofery in the vain of Scary Movie and the likes. Shaun of the Dead is best described as a romantic comedy where there happen to be z- umm… you know, the undead, walking around. I hate the term romantic comedy because this is as comedic as “The Office” (lame comparison, I know, but I’ve been watching it recently and it springs to mind – Lucy Davis aka Dawn is also in the cast, plus Martin Freeman aka Tim makes a brief appearance), but it’s romantic, it’s very funny, so there you go. Then there’s the stuff that fans of Romero will love. Everything that we wanted from the Dawn of the Dead remake is ironically right here – flashes of the music, slow moving zombies that seem to have stepped right out of ’78 apart from the make-up, and one visual effect in particular which is why I don’t recommend it to the weak stomached…
I don’t mean to put down the remake at all, read my review of that and you’ll see I didn’t entirely dislike it … I just prefer this by far – and usually, I’m not so wowed by British cinema (though hmm, watched Love Actually last night and my reaction – which I’ll post later – was actually quite disturbing for my I-hate-British-cinema-right-now stance). It’s finally a movie that’s willing to go its own way. A lot of people will come to this and they’ll like bits of it but be put off by the rest. The gore, for example, is supremely grotesque, more than I’d expected by far, worse than the Dawn remake, but I guess it gets a lower rating because it’s slightly more absurd and a little more fake. Add in serious moments (SPOILER mum turns into a zombie, so you can guess where that ends up) and some biting media digs that some will find out of place in what amounts to an alright popcorn movie, and though it cobbles together homage, rip-off and parody for its duration, not unlike Tarantino’s Kill Bill, it comes out, not unlike Tarantino’s Kill Bill, smelling of completely original roses.
The camerawork in particular surprised me for a Brit-flick. The closest I’ve seen to some of the great long steadicam shots in this movie was in the half-British Notting Hill as Hugh Grant walks through the market, but if I remember rightly, that shot was achieved digitally. A shot in Shaun where Shaun walks out of his house and across the street and into a newsagents’, a shot which is done a couple of times too, is an instant favourite shot of mine. It’s not just this though: overall the camera just feels much free-er here than the usual big-screen television British filmmakers usually come out with. Considering the director here came from television, this is pretty impressive indeed.
Dawn of the Dead [1978]
Wednesday, April 7th, 2004I still haven’t seen the remake, and probably won’t now until it’s been long available on DVD, but I really don’t think it’s in with a chance of rivalling this original for me. The effects may be better and the zombies more “realistic” (why do some people really think they know what “real” monsters look like, lol?), but the thing is, the whole soul of this movie is in the look. That’s why it originally scared the hell out of me. The zombies are so obviously just people covered in blue paint, and the ketchup so obviously red paint, and the colour film stock does the whole combo no favours, but it’s enough to be completely terrifying somehow.
I’m sure this is a cut I haven’t seen before of the movie. I never so so much violence in the movie. Plenty enough, yes, but not as much as in this cut. And I’m sure I’d never seen kids being shot in it. These moments add so much to the horrific atmosphere and the obvious ‘Nam/ American Nightmare allegory.
This movie for me is a classic for one simple concept it came up with – zombies in a mall. It just says everything about not just American society but all of Western civilisation.
And the muzak rocks.


![Teething [2007]](http://ambival.net/images/teething.jpg)
![Karma Shot [2008]](http://ambival.net/images/karmashot.jpg)