Posts Tagged ‘zombies’

Pontypool

Pontypool

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

“Avoid the English language. Please do not translate this message.”

Here’s another movie that pretty much had me from the moment I first heard about it in Mark Kermode’s cryptic review on Five Live. He described it as a zombie movie but not a zombie movie, set entirely within a radio station, where the epidemic has something to do with language… and I’m not sure if I can do any better than that. It’s one of those movies you feel desperate to avoid spoilers on, the kind that makes me just want to write here “just see it,” lol.

What I will say is something about the cast. I’ve never seen any of the three main actors in anything before* (there’s a couple of other roles, but as I said, it’s mostly combined to a single radio studio) but it is simply one of the most perfect ensembles I’ve ever seen. This threesome feels so genuine, and that is about the most important element you can have at the start of a movie like this. Stephen McHattie absolutely revels in his role as the wannabe shock-jock lumbered with a smalltown morning show, just as Lisa Houle relishes being the straighthead reigning him in, just as Georgina Reilly channels early Anna Faris as the sacrificial assistant.

The movie at first, because of McHattie’s character, reminded me most of movies like Talk Radio, and it is simply a joy to sit with these characters on a regular morning for them, some great monologue, gentle ribbing etc – but soon enough stuff starts to get strange, then stranger, then slightly frightening, and finally, without warning, actually kind of hilarious. I think some people will have problems – if they don’t have problems from the start, lol – with the final absurd turn of this movie, but I absolutely loved it. I do think there’s more to be made of what it seems to think it has to say about the nature of words, the dispersal of information etc, but if all you’re expecting from this is a little Canadian horror, then there is so much more here you’ll be in heaven if you’ve got a head.

*okay, looking at the IMDb, it turns out I have in a few little things, but I didn’t recognise any of them lol – point is they’re not exactly stars.



Survival of the Dead

Survival of the Dead

Saturday, July 17th, 2010

I was still slightly baffled as I sat down to this after months of having it in my collection… while it’s true that his own additions to the original “Dead” trilogy (Night, Dawn, Day) haven’t come close to the greatness of old, it seems to me we should still be excited to have a new George Romero zombie movie coming out. I watched Land of the Dead again a couple of weeks ago and to my surprise had nothing new to add to my original review… it kinda has “something” but overall is dull as hell. I did, however, really like Diary of the Dead which, despite the obvious comparisons to Blair Witch, Cloverfield, etc, still had something genuinely pointed and grim to say about humanity at its close.

For me, Survival falls somewhere between the two other installments in the “new” trilogy. It references both Land and Diary, though mostly continues where Land left off, with Diary being a kind of appendix to the whole thing. The movie opens with some spectacular gore so it had at least one of the primary boxes for this kind of movie ticked from the off. Then it sinks into that same dullness of Land, however. Essentially the USP of this movie (where Night had the originality, Dawn the mall, Day the experiments, Land the sentients, Diary the style) is that there’s a movement to keep loved ones who have become zombies alive – think Nick Frost in the shed at the end of Shaun of the Dead, eg – and of course the only moral way to do that is to get them to eat something other than humans. It’s… interesting, I guess.

What really left me thinking of this movie higher than I otherwise might have is, as with Diary, the really simple summation of the idea that Romero conveys with a single final line and image. It’s the image of two zombies, the leaders of each side of the conflict throughout the movie, against an enormous full moon, approaching each other armed as if to duel. They raise their guns to fire, and they’re both out of ammo. The voiceover explains how when a war rages for so long, it’s easy to forget what we’re fighting over. To me it’s one of those perfect scenarios for a zombie movie which unfortunately the rest of this one doesn’t go into enough. The thing about Romero’s zombie movies is they’re simply about humans losing their humanity, and not only in the physical sense. This one doesn’t go far enough at all, but his heart is still certainly in the right place. I’ll still approach the next one with high expectations.



Children Shouldn’t Play With Dead Things

Children Shouldn’t Play With Dead Things

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

Blah. I shoulda known this wouldnt’ be much since I didn’t even like Bob Clark’s most popular movie A Christmas Story that much let alone his next best known work Black Christmas. Some reviews I saw compared this to George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead but I found it closer to the Evil Dead which I guess is the highest praise I can give it in that it predated that movie by almost a a decade. I felt quite comfortable giving this way less than my full attention and I’m pretty sure I didn’t miss anything. I don’t even have a clue where the comments on the movie’s “campness” come from ‘cos I didn’t detect any. I’m posting this movie over a week after watching and it’s vanished completely from my memory.



Quarantine

Quarantine

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

What is there to say of this but that it’s really not as bad as it’s tempting to go in expecting. While it’s true that you will get a better experience, aside from the lipsync, by watching a dubbed version of [Rec], it’s also undeniable that the Western remake brigade could’ve got away with a lot less respect for the source than they ultimately do here. There are unnecessary changes here and there (in addition, it must be said, to some rather amazing inventions: death by camera, for instance), and the acting isn’t quite as convincing; plus there was simply something about the original being located in a literally foreign place, making the confines of the apartment block all the more alienating; but this is still a fantastic experience that made me jump more than a lot of recent horror movies. Clearly I have to recommend [Rec] first and foremost … but if you do happen to be illiterate or a Xenophobe … there are worse things you could watch.



[Rec]

[Rec]

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

Again, here is why I do the Halloween marathon each and every year even though it too often entails sitting through too much awfulness than is healthy for a borderline manic-depressive, lol. Well, between this and The Strangers, I can safely say I had a great one this year (and I’m still technically halfway at this stage, hehe, continuing it today and through the weekend; in fact, repeat viewings of the classics will likely go on to mid-November, ROFL). I was apprehensive about watching this initially as it’s been a long time since I watched anything with subtitles. But the runtime of well under 90 minutes and my usual rule of, “ya know what? if it’s good, it’ll grab me,” forced me to put it on at the end of a long night when I could finally keep my eyes on the screen to read.

I needn’t have worried about that, really, for two reasons. One, this belongs to the great tradition of great foreign language movies – indeed, any language movies – where the dialogue really isn’t all that essential. Like Amélie or Life is Beautiful, you could easily watch this with the translations absent and still perhaps be just as terrified as I ultimately found myself. In fact, it might even help, so much is the fear here created by the feeling of being trapped in an unfamiliar location. Yes – did I mention? – this really is perhaps the scariest movie I have ever seen. That statement might be exhaggerated due to it being so long since I’ve been this terrified by a movie. But let’s just put it this way – these 80 odd minutes reminded me completely in the end of how I felt the first time I saw The Exorcist. This is coming from someone who has really been quite numbed by the sheer quantity of films of this genre that I’ve seen. I can’t speak highly enough of this movie, how overjoyed I was to realise I can still be made to feel this way in a darkened room for an hour and a half, lol.

There is clearly a Blair Witch-y influence going on here in the style, fake reality nightmare etc. The opening actually reminded me a lot of Hellraiser III though, too. It quickly becomes a kind of zombie movie more in the tradition of 28 Days Later, the sickness affecting people never really being defined entirely – George Romero’s latest installment in the “Dead” trilogy is another clear comparison and it must be said, I realise he really missed the boat having seen this. Then there’s the end of the movie, where it really enters Exorcist territory. I almost worried that this might ruin the movie for me, but it only terrified me more. When the religious side of things comes in here, and that creature stalking in shadow … I was literally staring at the screen, eyes wide, hand over my mouth, saying out loud, “WHATTHE F*CK … IS IT?!!” It is simply a phenomenal production, incredible performances all around and a pace and tone that just never lets you go.



Diary of the Dead

Diary of the Dead

Sunday, May 4th, 2008

“If it’s not on camera, it’s like it never happened …. right?”

It sounded a little dodgy and I certainly didn’t want to be too hasty about being excited about this latest “official” installment in the Romero Dead series after Land (which I’ve watched most of again recently … in short, it really didn’t warrant a new review, it’s pretty unremarkable) … but at the same time I kind of couldn’t help myself. Even though this mockumentary horror thing has been done almost to death now since Blair Witch leading through to Cloverfield, bringing the technique to the Dead series sounded pretty fascinating, and any time Romero returns to this series it’s exciting, as they’re always among the most important horror movies, if not always quite the best.

Overall, it works. While it’s not quite the “zombies in a mall” of the masterful Dawn, the social commentary here (though perhaps a little obvious: just about anyone who documents the dreary details of their life in a blog or who has neglected to truly experience a vacation because they were behind a camera the whole time will understand what it’s saying well enough) is certainly more pointed than that in Land.

It gets a little dull towards the end, the whole thing just isn’t as awash with the message as Dawn was, and it frequently becomes “just another teen horror movie”. But the end (“Are we really worth saving? You tell me.”) sends you out with genuine chills running down your spine. It’s in your face and feels like a hammer on the head, but it does the job of “implicating the audience” a million times better than, for example, Funny Games U.S.. There is some humour to counter this depressing stuff, however: I don’t think I’ve laughed more this year than I did over the “Hello, I’m Samuel” sign :)



Fido

Fido

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

“We can’t afford a zombie! We’re barely keeping up with funeral payments!”

Anyone for Shaun of the Dead meets Monster House? I looked forward to seeing this from the moment I heard about it (which, given it came out in 2006, was a little late I guess) … a kind of post-zombie movie set in the Fifties, just when you thought nothing new could be done with the genre. Zombies have been domesticated in a manner similar to the way we see them at the end of Shaun, and poor suburban mom Carrie-Ann Moss is hysterically ashamed at being the only family in the street without one to do the gardening etc.

Considering the number of children in it and the bright colour scheme, it’s actually surprisingly gory in places – I expected something a lot more family friendly but of course wasn’t disappointed by this surprise :) It’s nothing spectacular but it’s certainly unpredictable and fun. It would make a great double bill with any Fifties metaphor for a world rotting beneath its glossy sheen, but I’m inclined to think a more perfect companion would be last year’s Blood Car.



Day of the Dead [2008]

Day of the Dead [2008]

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

That this went straight to video despite the success of the Dawn of the Dead remake and despite the presence of Ving Rhames and Mena Suvari in the cast was about the worst omen a zombie movie could have, and I’d read some pretty bad things about it. As always, though, I seem to come from a different place than most interested parties on this one; I wasn’t that crazy for Zack Snyder’s remake of Dawn, though the original Day has its moments it’s still no original Dawn, and just last year I had, some might say, the misfortune of seeing Day of the Dead 2: Contagion, which I actually found myself kinda liking.

There’s nothing wrong with this one at all – that they even include to an extent the “docile zombie” element from the original is all I need to forgive any of its failings. No, that element isn’t probed as beautifully as Romero did; but they come closer than Snyder’s Dawn which, even though they used a mall and everything, completely missed the point of Romero’s original. The gore is fantastic, and frankly I’m baffled as to why anyone thought this wouldn’t do well on the big screen.