Blah. I shoulda known this wouldnt’ be much since I didn’t even like Bob Clark’s most popular movie A Christmas Story that much let alone his next best known work Black Christmas. Some reviews I saw compared this to George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead but I found it closer to the Evil Dead which I guess is the highest praise I can give it in that it predated that movie by almost a a decade. I felt quite comfortable giving this way less than my full attention and I’m pretty sure I didn’t miss anything. I don’t even have a clue where the comments on the movie’s “campness” come from ‘cos I didn’t detect any. I’m posting this movie over a week after watching and it’s vanished completely from my memory.
Posts Tagged ‘zombies’
Quarantine
Thursday, February 12th, 2009What is there to say of this but that it’s really not as bad as it’s tempting to go in expecting. While it’s true that you will get a better experience, aside from the lipsync, by watching a dubbed version of [Rec], it’s also undeniable that the Western remake brigade could’ve got away with a lot less respect for the source than they ultimately do here. There are unnecessary changes here and there (in addition, it must be said, to some rather amazing inventions: death by camera, for instance), and the acting isn’t quite as convincing; plus there was simply something about the original being located in a literally foreign place, making the confines of the apartment block all the more alienating; but this is still a fantastic experience that made me jump more than a lot of recent horror movies. Clearly I have to recommend [Rec] first and foremost … but if you do happen to be illiterate or a Xenophobe … there are worse things you could watch.
[Rec]
Monday, November 3rd, 2008Again, here is why I do the Halloween marathon each and every year even though it too often entails sitting through too much awfulness than is healthy for a borderline manic-depressive, lol. Well, between this and The Strangers, I can safely say I had a great one this year (and I’m still technically halfway at this stage, hehe, continuing it today and through the weekend; in fact, repeat viewings of the classics will likely go on to mid-November, ROFL). I was apprehensive about watching this initially as it’s been a long time since I watched anything with subtitles. But the runtime of well under 90 minutes and my usual rule of, “ya know what? if it’s good, it’ll grab me,” forced me to put it on at the end of a long night when I could finally keep my eyes on the screen to read.
I needn’t have worried about that, really, for two reasons. One, this belongs to the great tradition of great foreign language movies – indeed, any language movies – where the dialogue really isn’t all that essential. Like Amélie or Life is Beautiful, you could easily watch this with the translations absent and still perhaps be just as terrified as I ultimately found myself. In fact, it might even help, so much is the fear here created by the feeling of being trapped in an unfamiliar location. Yes – did I mention? – this really is perhaps the scariest movie I have ever seen. That statement might be exhaggerated due to it being so long since I’ve been this terrified by a movie. But let’s just put it this way – these 80 odd minutes reminded me completely in the end of how I felt the first time I saw The Exorcist. This is coming from someone who has really been quite numbed by the sheer quantity of films of this genre that I’ve seen. I can’t speak highly enough of this movie, how overjoyed I was to realise I can still be made to feel this way in a darkened room for an hour and a half, lol.
There is clearly a Blair Witch-y influence going on here in the style, fake reality nightmare etc. The opening actually reminded me a lot of Hellraiser III though, too. It quickly becomes a kind of zombie movie more in the tradition of 28 Days Later, the sickness affecting people never really being defined entirely – George Romero’s latest installment in the “Dead” trilogy is another clear comparison and it must be said, I realise he really missed the boat having seen this. Then there’s the end of the movie, where it really enters Exorcist territory. I almost worried that this might ruin the movie for me, but it only terrified me more. When the religious side of things comes in here, and that creature stalking in shadow … I was literally staring at the screen, eyes wide, hand over my mouth, saying out loud, “WHAT … THE F*CK … IS IT?!!” It is simply a phenomenal production, incredible performances all around and a pace and tone that just never lets you go.
Diary of the Dead
Sunday, May 4th, 2008“If it’s not on camera, it’s like it never happened …. right?”
It sounded a little dodgy and I certainly didn’t want to be too hasty about being excited about this latest “official” installment in the Romero Dead series after Land (which I’ve watched most of again recently … in short, it really didn’t warrant a new review, it’s pretty unremarkable) … but at the same time I kind of couldn’t help myself. Even though this mockumentary horror thing has been done almost to death now since Blair Witch leading through to Cloverfield, bringing the technique to the Dead series sounded pretty fascinating, and any time Romero returns to this series it’s exciting, as they’re always among the most important horror movies, if not always quite the best.
Overall, it works. While it’s not quite the “zombies in a mall” of the masterful Dawn, the social commentary here (though perhaps a little obvious: just about anyone who documents the dreary details of their life in a blog or who has neglected to truly experience a vacation because they were behind a camera the whole time will understand what it’s saying well enough) is certainly more pointed than that in Land.
It gets a little dull towards the end, the whole thing just isn’t as awash with the message as Dawn was, and it frequently becomes “just another teen horror movie”. But the end (“Are we really worth saving? You tell me.”) sends you out with genuine chills running down your spine. It’s in your face and feels like a hammer on the head, but it does the job of “implicating the audience” a million times better than, for example, Funny Games U.S.. There is some humour to counter this depressing stuff, however: I don’t think I’ve laughed more this year than I did over the “Hello, I’m Samuel” sign
Fido
Thursday, March 20th, 2008“We can’t afford a zombie! We’re barely keeping up with funeral payments!”
Anyone for Shaun of the Dead meets Monster House? I looked forward to seeing this from the moment I heard about it (which, given it came out in 2006, was a little late I guess) … a kind of post-zombie movie set in the Fifties, just when you thought nothing new could be done with the genre. Zombies have been domesticated in a manner similar to the way we see them at the end of Shaun, and poor suburban mom Carrie-Ann Moss is hysterically ashamed at being the only family in the street without one to do the gardening etc.
Considering the number of children in it and the bright colour scheme, it’s actually surprisingly gory in places – I expected something a lot more family friendly but of course wasn’t disappointed by this surprise
It’s nothing spectacular but it’s certainly unpredictable and fun. It would make a great double bill with any Fifties metaphor for a world rotting beneath its glossy sheen, but I’m inclined to think a more perfect companion would be last year’s Blood Car.
Day of the Dead [2008]
Tuesday, February 26th, 2008That this went straight to video despite the success of the Dawn of the Dead remake and despite the presence of Ving Rhames and Mena Suvari in the cast was about the worst omen a zombie movie could have, and I’d read some pretty bad things about it. As always, though, I seem to come from a different place than most interested parties on this one; I wasn’t that crazy for Zack Snyder’s remake of Dawn, though the original Day has its moments it’s still no original Dawn, and just last year I had, some might say, the misfortune of seeing Day of the Dead 2: Contagion, which I actually found myself kinda liking.
There’s nothing wrong with this one at all – that they even include to an extent the “docile zombie” element from the original is all I need to forgive any of its failings. No, that element isn’t probed as beautifully as Romero did; but they come closer than Snyder’s Dawn which, even though they used a mall and everything, completely missed the point of Romero’s original. The gore is fantastic, and frankly I’m baffled as to why anyone thought this wouldn’t do well on the big screen.
Day of the Dead 2: Contagium
Tuesday, December 18th, 2007I was honestly not nearly as offended by this in the end as I expected. Clearly, I would prefer it had been made by Romero or at least someone involved in the original series of zombie flicks (Tom Savini, perhaps), or not at all. Clearly, the gore effects simply aren’t comparable to anything in Romero’s originals. But, I don’t know … it somehow flows for me, it doesn’t remotely threaten the integrity of the official releases, and it actually tries to do its own thing. Why they thought it necessary to use the Day of the Dead brand is anyone’s guess, except of course the monitary value of it. The abrupt ending is a little weird, too. But compared to what I expected, this was almost a pleasant surprise.
Dawn of the Dead (2004)
Wednesday, August 11th, 2004I thought I was going to have to heavily update this review after watching it again the other day, but now I read it over again and I can’t understand why I rated it so highly before, because basically, all the below still applies, only now it’s in my worst 5 movies of the year list. I would still say it’s worth watching once, with the volume up loud etc, because it has a one-hit kick to it. But anymore would be foolhardy. Not even a dustmark on the original’s negative.
As expected, this remake had no chance of living up to the original for me. For a moment though, I was thrown – the first 10 minutes or so, pre-credits, are downright perfect, and show how much can be achieved without heavy blood-letting and bad language, and how much potential this first time director, Zack Snyder, may have. But it’s downhill pretty much from the start of the opening credits.
The problem with this movie for me, I think, lies in the fact that it assumes nothing of the audience. Some might find this somehow praiseworthy – there has been a remake of the “prequel”, Night of the Living Dead, which sets up the zombies being “born” but it was in 1990, 14 years ago. So I guess the film makers figured they might have some zombie newbies in the audience and decided to make all the characters zombie newbies too. I really don’t think it works. Even the original Dawn of the Dead was made a decade after its prequel. George Romero dealt with explaining the zombies (in particular stuff like, how to kill them, and that it’s the bites that kill and resurrect) in the opening news sequences, a device that’s present in the remake but isn’t used the same way. So we end up with, basically, stupid characters, unless you happen to know nothing about the zombies.
I had to stifle a laugh as soon as I saw the pregnant girl as part of the main group… I mean, you just know how that’s going to turn out. But that alone isn’t enough – it has to be the most unconvincing pregnancy I’ve ever seen on film too. The baby turns out to be one of the worst visual effects in the movie, and the whole character could be happily excised from the screenplay as far as I’m concerned.
I need to get the screenplay out of the way because it’s the movie’s biggest failing. There’s a guy across the street from our main gang in the mall and throughout the movie he communicates by writing messages on a whiteboard which he holds up for Ving Rhames to read through his binoculars. At the beginning, he writes “Andy – alone” on the board by way of introduction. Then Rhames (or whoever it is who’s looking through the binoculars – I think it’s one of the others actually) has to turn to the others and say, just to clarify, “His name is Andy. He’s alone.” Now, fair enough, it had to be said because the others don’t have binoculars… but it’s just such an unwieldy moment. Then there are the action movie clichés – an ending straight out of “The A-Team”, and a doubter of the plan saying, “Let me get this straight, you wanna…. [blah blah difficult and ridiculous plan]…” to which the others go, “Yup… yep… pretty much,” and he responds, “Okay. I’m in.” There must have been hundreds of better Dawn of the Dead remake scripts out there, I don’t know why the hell this one was picked.
But that’s the screenplay. Snyder does his best with what he has. The actors are all as good as can be expected for a horror movie. Ving Rhames gets some nice lines and delivers them in his inimitable manner (“Go in the cubicle, say five hail Mary’s, wipe yo’ ass and you’re good with God,”) and there’s plenty of freaky looking faces plus a few cameos for original fans. The music is very different from the original but works with the very different visuals. Saving Private Ryan style fast film stock (I think it’s fast film stock, I always forget how the effect is achieved, I just flick my video camera into sports mode…) is used to interesting effect and increasingly towards the finale. And there’s a nice idea of telling the “after-story” while the end credits roll.
This will make a good night out for today’s young people who want a really quick fix and buckets of blood (boy, when did I get so old?) But it won’t last out the original, and won’t even last out other recent horror remakes like The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and The Ring. Its problem really is, it’s too stupid.


![Teething [2007]](http://ambival.net/images/teething.jpg)
![Karma Shot [2008]](http://ambival.net/images/karmashot.jpg)