Posts Tagged ‘trash’

Hobgoblins

Hobgoblins

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

There are bad movies and there are bad movies. I came to this much as I came to Evil Toons … the tagline for this contains the line “careful what you wish for” and the plot summary describes creatures which make your fantasies come true … before killing you. And I’m not gonna deny, this notion appeals to me, lol. Then I spent 30 minutes wondering just where are the eponymous goblins? Only to discover, when they finally appear, that oh dear … oh dear oh dear oh dear …

What baffles me most about movies this kind of bad is that they can’t even satisfy the prurient interest factor. They can’t even give the core audience a decent gory death, a titillating amount of flesh … they can’t even come up with interesting fantasies. It’s possible for a movie to be completely devoid of story, acting, originality, yet still anybody can put these cheap and shallow elements on the screen … just, not in this film. Yes, there’s an argument to be made that these things shouldn’t be on the screen in the first place (though I won’t get behind it :-P ) … the point I’m making is that if you’re gonna make a movie like this – and here somebody has – you better at least deliver them. Otherwise it’s just insulting that such a thing made it into my viewing experience.



Evil Toons

Evil Toons

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

I dropped the ball on watching movies this week so I figured, what better way to get back into it than as atrociously easy a watch as this. I could’ve reviewed this one with my eyes closed almost – I have to admit, I have a weakness for the whole embarrassed nudity thing from Zapped! right up to a certain episode of Alex Mack LOL and from the surface it appeared that was this movie’s raison d’etre (“First they undress you, then they possess you!)

Here you have all the ingredients in place – 3 dumb certified “hotties”, one smart prude (she’s wearing glasses, that’s how you tell), one Bill Oddie lookalike who can’t believe his luck, and a preface ripped straight off from Evil Dead. Sooner or later, you hear the phrase, “Heyy … check this out!” and they awaken evil forces etc.

What’s clear in the end here is that they didn’t plan the movie very well. There’s barely any animated footage and what exists is laughable to say the least. The presence of Dick Miller not to mention David Carradine instills some confidence but there’s nothing to get excited about at all here. For kinky toon shenanigans you’re better off with Cool World or even Who Framed Roger Rabbit?



Children Shouldn’t Play With Dead Things

Children Shouldn’t Play With Dead Things

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

Blah. I shoulda known this wouldnt’ be much since I didn’t even like Bob Clark’s most popular movie A Christmas Story that much let alone his next best known work Black Christmas. Some reviews I saw compared this to George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead but I found it closer to the Evil Dead which I guess is the highest praise I can give it in that it predated that movie by almost a a decade. I felt quite comfortable giving this way less than my full attention and I’m pretty sure I didn’t miss anything. I don’t even have a clue where the comments on the movie’s “campness” come from ‘cos I didn’t detect any. I’m posting this movie over a week after watching and it’s vanished completely from my memory.



Troll 2

Troll 2

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

So, apparently I’ve been infected. I wasn’t aware of just how large a cult following this dire, mindrottingly bad sequel had until I was searching for images and info after the end credits rolled. Trying to find some kind of explanation for what I’d just seen, you might say. This one is truly, truly bad. It’s the kind of movie that leaves me trying to remember the other movies right down the bottom of my bad list that it might be in contention with. Thing is, I can’t deny, the phrase touted by its fans – “best worst movie” – really is kind of fitting. I can’t put this right at the bottom of any list, for the simple reason that it kinda blew my mind so much by its badness.

At its centre for me is the girl pictured above, Deborah Reed as the witchy character Creedence Leonore Gielgud. Now, I know, I’m weird, but there is something about a hellish woman like this able and willing to transform people’s bodies in weird and wonderful ways that appeals to my strangest inner child – the one that would’ve gone to Ursula after watching The Little Mermaid even knowing that she’d ultimately turn me into one of those funny slime things just ‘cos she might turn me into something else beforehand, lol. And this character serves perfectly. Reed revels either knowingly or not in the trashiness of the movie and was surely an inspiration for Uma Thuman’s Poison Ivy in Batman and Robin. For her alone, the movie is more than worth watching. It’s worth watching without her though – you just come out of this thinking one word questions like “how?!” “why?!” … the effects and make-up are hysterically awful. Yet you just can’t keep your eyes off. I’m sure I’ll watch this again some time … but I have no idea why …



Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance

Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance

Monday, December 8th, 2008

So, unlike Seed, this one really had nothing going for it but Jodelle – lord how I wish I weren’t such a loyal fan sometimes, lol. To make matters worse, she’s not even in this one much. In fact, the role calls even less upon her talents than The Messengers did (and that’s sayin’ somethin’). The big names wisely stayed away from this one and though the action moves to a more appealing, slicker Western time period than the first, complete with a score whose Ennio Morricone influence is so transparent it’s hilarious, it’s really just as (if it’s even possible, more) missable than the first. Nuff said.



Blood Feast 2: All You Can Eat

Blood Feast 2: All You Can Eat

Saturday, December 22nd, 2007

It’s a rare movie these days that actually makes my jaw drop over gore, and this movie wins if only for making me do exactly that more than a few times over its duration. It’s as badly acted and cheesy as the other HG Lewis movies I’ve watched over the year, but alongside Two Thousand Maniacs it’s really the only one I’m ever likely to watch again.

The gore really is astoundingly vile, lol, and it’s incredible how like the old Lewis movies it really feels, despite being made decades after – like, these days, we still have bad acting in movies, but somehow Lewis managed to cast people here who deliver a whole different class of bad acting. I think that’s perhaps why it works better than the older ones for me; like, the reproduction of that feel of almost 40 years previous is almost a gimmick in itself … and 5 years before Tarantino’s Grindhouse, you’ve kinda gotta put your hands together for an near-80-year-old who can still deliver something so schlocky. It almost makes me want to check out the others again. The John Waters cameo is icing on the cake :)



The Year Without a Santa Claus [2006]

The Year Without a Santa Claus [2006]

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

There’s literally nothing to say about this one. Like, it even failed to be quite so bad as I’d been led to believe. But right from the dodgy opening credits, this is just a miserably cheap excuse for a Christmas movie. Harvey Fierstein should be absolutely ashamed of himself for stooping so low as he does here, but the rest of the cast aren’t much more excusable. When there are movies out there like Elf and The Grinch that effortlessly bear brute-force repeat viewings this time of year, stuff like this really should be pictured next to the word “waste” in the dictionary.



She-Devils on Wheels

She-Devils on Wheels

Monday, December 10th, 2007

Blah. Another quite underwhelming piece of trash from Herschell Gordon Lewis. A bunch of girls on bikes – who appear to have been cast straight off the street – umm … ride their bikes, tease some men, and finally behead one of them. That last part is actually fairly cool by virtue of its surprise. Knowing that Lewis started out in soft porno movies, midway through this, nothing having happened, I started to assume (despite the title and DVD packaging) that this must’ve been one of his earlier movies. So, yeh, the ending works to some extent. But worth 80 minutes of my time? Not likely.