Posts Tagged ‘Seventies’

Cemetery Junction

Cemetery Junction

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

A little like The A-Team, I may have actually once had overly high expectations of this which had all but vanished by the time it finally became a reality. I think Ricky Gervais and/or Stephen Merchant hinted at doing a more serious work way back between The Office and Extras whenever asked “what next?” and, given how effective some of the more serious moments in those shows were, I couldn’t wait to see what happened with whatever they ended up doing.

I’ve remained a fan of Gervais over the years, but since Extras it’s been a lot like I am with Kevin Smith. I’m perfectly loyal, listening to and watching any podcast or DVD they put out, but it’s never been with such passion as I had with their early work (with Gervais, The Office, to which I was a relative latecomer; with Smith, of course, the New Jersey Trilogy). After his fairly unremarkable turns in Ghost Town and The Invention of Lying, not to mention the lacklustre initial reception of this when it first hit cinemas earlier in the year, needless to say, I really wasn’t super hyped to see this in the end.

The story’s as old-fashioned as its 1970s setting, the younger generation of a dead end town yearning to various degrees (whether they know it or not yet) to get the hell out and “make something” of their lives. The central character Freddie takes a job under the brutal Ralph Fiennes as an insurance salesman but quickly learns that this admittedly safe life might not necessarily be the right way to spend his time on the planet.

I say quickly – the initial pace of this movie is just as old-fashioned as the story, and it takes a pretty long time to get going. For me, aside from an hilarious early scene at the junction itself where Freddie’s chunky and slightly simple companion “Snork” is introduced to his perfect girl (though he doesn’t know it yet – a wonderful subplot in itself, incidentally), the movie really takes off at the Winner’s Ball sequence midway.

We meet Emily Watson as Ralph Fiennes’ wife but once before the Winner’s Ball (an annual dinner to greet the insurance company’s new blood and see off the old), and she’s the timid housewife we’ve seen many times before. There’s a simply beautiful lonely shot of her stirring a cup of tea in the doorway, a cup of tea that will become an important symbol later on. But it’s at the Winner’s Ball sequence that we see just how trapped she is. She’s repeatedly shot down by her husband as she tries to speak in company; when her husband asks around the table at the men’s life plans, Freddie points out that he forgot to ask their daughter, Julie, what she thinks. Watson stares at Freddie with stunned admiration as if nobody ever contradicted her husband before, let alone suggest that women might have plans of their own, all this as Julie unashamedly outlines her plans to be a professional photographer. To cap it all, Freddie later brings Watson a drink, and asks her to dance. The way Watson takes all this, what to her is clearly the most pampering she’s seen in years, is simply heartbreaking.

It’s at the Winner’s Ball too that one of the movie’s harshest statements comes, as a retiring salesman is given a reward for decades of hard work… a cheap cut glass (not crystal, Fiennes flatly clarifies) fruit bowl. Freddie of course takes all of this in and it’s here he begins to wonder if this life, though safe and lucrative, is right. The movie (quite literally on the soundtrack) builds to a crescendo after this point as more and more incidents convince Freddie of the “right” path to take. It may all be a little predictable but it’s certainly inspiring.

There are bad things. The overly corny scenes, for example, between one of Freddie’s other friends and a deadbeat dad who turns out to have a sad backstory that sort of comes across as cod Cartwright or something. Don’t get me wrong, this thread works when it gets where it’s going, but it’s inconsistent with the rest of the movie on its way. Ricky Gervais plays Freddie’s father, and simply put he’s just not believable as a father let alone one who’ll get his hands dirty in a factory.

But there are more good things too: a wonderful love scene in a dark room, something I’m not sure I’ve ever seen before – a shared act of creation bathed in red monochrome that just can’t help but be overly intimate (“Why are we whispering?” one of them asks mid-conversation). The production design throughout is simply stunning – it’s a shame for this and Watson (who it bears repeating is just phenomenal) that apparently the movie won’t be eligible for Oscars next year, though perhaps they’ll be noticed at the BAFTAs (with Gervais involved it seems likely).

Cemetery Junction‘s heart, like much of what Ricky Gervais does (on the rare occasion he’s being serious), is absolutely in the right place, and it’s really impossible to quibble too much about any of its failings for this single reason in today’s cinematic climate. I personally could watch it over and over again for Emily Watson alone, and I’m sure most people with a heart will find something here of their own to latch onto just as passionately.



When You’re Strange

When You’re Strange

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

I have to admit, though I have been and for the most part remain a huge Doors fan in my time, my expectations weren’t huge for this, not least because of Mark Kermode’s quite fair knocking of the whole Doors “thing” on his BBC Five Live Friday review show. I’m one who always wants to believe there was a spiritual and poetic resonance to Jim Morrison’s life even beyond what the likes of Oliver Stone’s movie portrayed, but I find it hard to defend him all that passionately when someone like Kermode points out the reasons why it was all just a joke… and Kermode did it pretty darn well in that review of this.

The movie is not helped at all by Johnny Depp’s narration. Apparently he was brought in to simply redub the narration already in place by the film’s writer-director Tom DiCillo because first audiences found DiCillo’s reading too monotonous. Considering how disinterested Depp sounds in the final version, I dread to think how the first take was.

But to be perfectly honest, this for me is where the movie’s failings end (the silly “omg Mr Mojo Risin is an anagram of Jim Morrison” moment notwithstanding). While the fact remains that there’s little of actual information here that as a Doors fan I hadn’t known before, all the anecdotes, stories, controversies and of course the music, the footage they have gathered is almost without exception extraordinary to behold and despite the presentation and packaging we should really be grateful to see it in any form.

I also read that this was meant to be an “anti-Oliver Stone” take on The Doors story, as Stone’s ’91 movie apparently offended as many fans as it created (count me in the latter set). I have no idea what’s wrong with the Stone movie and would gladly stick it together with this and maybe one of the concert DVDs to a make a full night of Doors viewing in the future. It’d be even better if they just released the footage sans-narration on a special edition Blu-ray, though. You should find this more than worth your time if you have anything more than a passing interest in music of the time.



Milk

Milk

Tuesday, December 30th, 2008

You can’t argue with where this movie is coming from, nor where it goes in the end. You can’t argue that the performances aren’t uniformly as fantastic as you’d expect, that the period production design isn’t almost creepily flawless in its authenticity, that the music isn’t beautiful – that, in short, all the elements are in place. But you can’t argue either, I think, that Gus Van Sant hasn’t made far better, more cutting and important, movies; that other film makers haven’t made better movies about sexuality and minorities; that – yes, I’m gonna say it again – there’s little more here than simply “well made”.

Which is a shame – the trailer really wowed me about a month ago and in the absence of much greatness in 2008, this was one of the big awards season releases I was looking forward to. The subdued feel of its opening, Harvey Milk dictating his story into a tape recorder, “to be played in the event of my assassination,” really drew me in … but my interest quickly dissipated as I slowly realised this movie wasn’t going to show or tell me anything much I hadn’t been shown or told before – and that even despite my never having heard of Milk before I saw the trailer.

Yes, there’s a pertinent significance, as there was with Frost / Nixon. But it’s kind of obvious as it was there too. You can’t help but think Prop 8 when Prop 6 is mentioned here just as you couldn’t help in F/N but to wonder who could be the Frost to our soon-to-leave-office Nixon today. But the fact that there are not only still idiots out there who believe that homosexuality is evil etc, but that they get away with such beliefs in positions of authority is less an issue to address in movies than an embarrassment for the human race to be dealt with at face. I could throw in here my personal belief that there are more important things to be talking about, that no one is talking about yet, that have their own parallels in this story: but I don’t particularly want to start that shitstorm right now.

Anyway … I just feel that if there were people out there around the time of Rent‘s release who felt it just wasn’t relevant anymore (something I couldn’t disagree with more vehemently), then I can’t be too wrong or alone in saying the same now of Milk. Unless, of course, the film makers are counting a certain other “Us” in when they have the main character talk about giving the “Uses” of the world hope.



Frost / Nixon

Frost / Nixon

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

Like a lot of movies this year (good lord, trust me I hope I stop saying that in ’09 even more than you do LOL), I didn’t know whether I was excited about this one or not. I’ve always been marginally fascinated by the whole Nixon thing, though I never quite found the time to let my interest blossom into anything more than that. I love Michael Sheen – he’s been long overdue an Oscar for me since the moment he wasn’t nominated for The Queen. In my book Langella, too, has deserved more recognition in the past, in particular for doing something with the character of Quilty in Adrian Lyne’s Lolita following the pretty much unbeatable Peter Sellers in the Kubrick version. But, a 2 hours plus movie about an interview? It just seemed so unlikely to work – even moreso as the strange Oscar buzz it’s gathered started emerging.

I’m gonna say something I think may be turning into some kind of muggy refrain here in my reviews which is, for all the goodness it contains, I don’t know if it really packs enough of a greater punch than the interviews themselves to warrant the spending involved with making a movie of this magnitude these days. The parallels in the story to recent history aren’t nearly as mindblowing as some people seem to be thinking. The last 30 minutes here, however, are satisfyingly electrifying, moreso than I’d set myself up for after the first 90. It leaves you feeling far from let down, and it’s a shame that the campaign machine has set both Langella and Sheen up for the same Oscar, because they both deserve to be nominated and even win for the performances here.



Alice, Sweet Alice aka Communion aka Holy Terror

Alice, Sweet Alice aka Communion aka Holy Terror

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

Weird how I hadn’t seen this one yet. I thought (particularly after the super-obscure Cathy’s Curse) I pretty much knew where all the devil children were ;-) I have to admit I was a little disappointed first when I realised Brooke Shields wasn’t the Alice of the title and then when I saw her vanish entirely from the cast within about 15 minutes of the runtime, lol; but it didn’t deter me too much from sticking with it. Shields’ performance has nothing on, say, her work in Pretty Baby a couple of years later, but really none of the performances here are particularly noteworthy – though there’s something particularly haunting about the face of the girl who does play Alice, I’m sure Brooke would’ve done just as serviceable a job.

It’s kind of like Don’t Look Now meets Mystic River at the start, with a tone similar to Mommie Dearest (but maybe that’s just the deceptively innocent sounding title working its incidious charm, hehe). In the end it’s one of those 70s horror movies that “just works” despite its flaws, and I could’ve pretty confidently told you as much before even putting it on. I know that I say that often, but somehow I can’t help it. It’ll be interesting in 20 or 30 years to see if people 20 or 30 years younger than me start saying the same of the crappy teen “horrors” of this decade, that’ll be a real noodlebaker, but for now, I can just repeat what I’ve said before, that though the technical stuff was often sprayed on the wall like so many guts in these productions, they really knew how to up the freakout factor and haunt you, be it with music, images, blood, or sound.

As I said the performances are lacking – it’d be easy to call the whole production frankly shocking, in fact. But such is the story that I’d prefer to call it abysmally stylised. Like Happy Birthday to Me, Bloody Birthday, the Slumber Party and Sleepover Camp movies, I’m even willing to give Black Christmas another shot … it was more worth my time than a lot of things lately.



The Wicker Man [1973]

The Wicker Man [1973]

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

The May Day staple :) Actually, I’m not sure if I’ve ever actually remembered to watch it on May 1st so this may actually be a first though it’s long been the plan. On this occasion I decided to watch the 15-minute-longer “director’s cut” – it took some deciding but in the end I remembered it’s really just the theatrical cut with deleted scenes spliced in so in a way you wind up watching both at the same time if you’re already familiar with the theatrical version.

I don’t think the extra scenes make a huge amount of difference – though it heightens our understanding of Howie to see him on the mainland at the start, the quality of the scenes (I’m not talking about the grainy nature of the print they had to use, I mean the general acting and production quality which dips below perfect more than a few times during the rest of the film) is the film at its most flawed and hokey. The sooner you get Edward Woodward in the same room as Britt Ekland or Christopher Lee here, the better, ‘cos that’s when all its failings go out of the window as it begins to soar into the ether.

It’s one of those films that can be taken many different ways depending on your outlook on all the fronts it addresses. Whether you’re religious or not, what religion that may be, what your moral views and more happen to be (and if you’re anything like me, all these things will tend to shift wildly over time), the movie will affect you differently, but every different interpretation will be just as extraordinary as the next.

Usually when I watch this movie, while I’m not exactly on the side of the Summerisle residents, I find myself just as against Howie as I am them: because of his stubbornness, it’s almost fun to watch him being made (literally, in the end) a fool of, that is, of course, until it all goes too far at the end. This time, I was struck at the end how everybody actually wins and I found his ending almost a triumph for his faith, a sacrifice as powerful as that of Karras at the end of The Exorcist, even though all control is out of Howie’s hands, he makes his own death into something grander … through his singing, his praying, his resoluteness to the end.

The way we see Howie almost wallowing in his religion throughout the movie, most particularly the struggle we see in him as Willow tempts him through the thin walls of the inn, his end here is almost inevitable and almost the only way he can resolve his devotion to that quite miserable form of religion. He wins because until the very end he insists on his own beliefs, he never gives into temptation; by the rules of his religion, not to mention the law, he’s done right.

Contrast that with, by law, the “murderers” of Summerisle, that horrifying image of Lee and others swinging from side to side joyously singing “Summertime is coming in,”: their end is happier, but it’s really no different from Howie’s. They’re just as trapped by the rules of their religion, and they win too.

It’s a stunningly simple set-up, and for me it works everytime, if sometimes a little differently than expected. As I said, it’s flawed, but there’s so much (I haven’t even mentioned the beautiful songs by Paul Giovanni, it’s one soundtrack I’ll never grow tired of) to make up for the dips in quality.



The Toolbox Murders [1978]

The Toolbox Murders [1978]

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

Finally I get original and remake lined up the right way round, lol. I had the Tobe Hooper remake of this hanging around for ages, was saving it for this year’s Halloween but I noticed this week that both versions were showing on TV by what looks like pure coincidence on different channels so I couldn’t resist watching them in succession.

It’s embarrassing to say, but I really got lost by this one in the end, mainly because I just wasn’t ready for a lot more than the kind of average mindless slasher it’s easy to have on in the background yet still somehow absorb completely. It opens appallingly, bad acting and all, and I feared the worst; but then the nailgun sequence kind of turned my head and it gets a lot better thereafter in all departments: except, as I say, for a subplot with a kidnapped girl that I really think I missed the details of.

I’d certainly watch it again on a Halloween sometime paying closer attention. For now, for the nailgun scene alone it’s worth checking out – it reminded me of Last House on the Left a little, it’s ghastly, horrible, wrong, but somehow beautiful and impossible to avoid looking at, that song playing over it very like David Hess’ stuff on the Wes Craven movie. Which reminds me, the score deserves mention too – I always find it amazing that these days even a lot of large budgeted movies resort to Sampletank and the like for their music, when back in the 60s and 70s so many of the lowest budgets seemed able to afford some kind of orchestra, lol.



A Star is Born [1976]

A Star is Born [1976]

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

After waiting years to finally get around to seeing this, I was pretty damn excited when I found a copy of it lying around that I’d previously thought unplayable. Sadly, the excitement didn’t last long. I was a huge fan of the 1937 movie when I saw it as a sixteen year old, it was probably the first “old” movie (outside of the ones all kids are exposed to anyway like Wizard of Oz and Snow White etc) I’d seen and among the first to really make me cry my eyes out (“This is Mrs Norman Maine!” lol I can actually barely remember the movie but that line will always be with me). One would think such an influential introduction to the original would put me off the remakes, but how can you refuse the 50s version with Judy Garland and James Mason and then this, with Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson?

Well, the problem with this version of the story is, it’s pretty much exactly as I imagined it would be; now that I’ve seen it, I wonder why I was ever so excited by the idea. It’s really more a showcase for Barbra Streisand’s talent and voice built shakily around the bones of the original. It hits all the marks, but somehow the story suddenly feels horribly loose, as though they’re just plodding through the plot points by the number to get to the next big song.

It has its moments, and it’s a worthy production if only for giving the world “Evergreen” – that scene here is by far the most affecting too … really, even in the music department outside of that song, this one disappoints. Compared to the emotion I wanted from it, I really couldn’t feel more let down. I’ve been amazed thinking lately why there hasn’t been another remake of the story since this one; now, having seen it, I don’t know whether to simply realise this is why that is or to wonder even more – afterall, I honestly think even a new remake with a Lindsay or Britney or Ashlee-a-like would have the potential to work better than this overall.