Posts Tagged ‘remake’

A Nightmare on Elm Street [2010]

A Nightmare on Elm Street [2010]

Friday, November 5th, 2010

While some people go into fits of “childhood raped!” when all these remakes get announced, I tend usually to remain a little calmer – it’s not like they’re starting by burning the original. When it comes to the Nightmare on Elm Street series, they can just about do whatever they want by me… more Freddy is always a good thing in my opinion. I flinched when it came out that Robert Englund would not be reprising the role, but when the casting of Jackie Earle Haley was announced, I kinda relaxed. He’s been great in his recent roles and looked like he’d fit the part nicely (though I did wonder if he feared typecasting after playing a child molester in Little Children also).

If there’s one thing that worried me most about this remake it was the enormous shift in the way Freddy’s past crimes are portrayed. Everybody speaks of the fact that Freddy is explicitly a child molester here and defends it, saying “he was always a child molester in the other movies, it just wasn’t talked about” but this is simply not true. The huge difference between “classic” Freddy and “new” Freddy is; the old Freddy killed children, he was a child killer – the new Freddy touched them; and for me it introduces a partially welcome yet cinematically not so welcome complexity to the fact that the parents of those children still burned him alive for this. In both cases the story becomes about “the sins of the father” being revisited on the young, vigilante violence never being the best answer… but in the remake one kinda sees where Freddy is coming from… and interesting though it may be, I’m not sure that’s a good thing.

It’s always nice to see Freddy returned to the darker place he began – the earthier, entirely serious version of the character in Wes Craven’s New Nightmare is a case in point. But I have to admit, I have a monumental soft spot for just about all of the sequels in this franchise, a spot that’s been seriously rekindled by recently watching the epic Never Sleep Again documentary. There was some serious imagination going on in all those sequels, and most of them touched on something deeper too (even if, like in Freddy’s Revenge, it wasn’t always intentional). I came to this remake, unlike those who were unfairly planning to compare it directly to the original, thinking, if it’s only as good as the least of the sequels, then that’s about as good as we can hope for.

The problem is, then, that it’s ultimately neither here nor there. The seriousness of Freddy’s crime and the questionable response of the parents to that crime introduces (at least, I believe it should introduce to any rational mind) too much grey to the proceedings of the main plot, while at the same time it just goes about business as usual in offing its teenage cast in new and unusual ways. We shouldn’t be thinking while Freddy slices and dices his victims, “wait, doesn’t he kinda deserve this kind of vengeance in a way?” especially when the kids concerned aren’t even as interesting as the likes of Nancy, Rod, Glenn, and even going into the sequels, Kristin, Alice, etc. The movie actually has one of the kids at one point suggest that in fact Freddy might never have even touched them in the first place, that the whole thing could just be hysteria gone out of control. This is all very interesting, but an Elm Street movie is so not the place for it, and if it is, then I think you have to be simultaneously a lot more simple and subtle about it.

But I feared as much about this aspect of the story. I figured if nothing else worked, then Haley’s Freddy just might. And on this I’m sad to say, I was wrong again. As with the makeover of Freddy’s backstory, there’s been an effort here to make Freddy’s very look darker and more “realistic”. Again, I feel this is a bad idea to begin with – the guy is operating in the dream world, making any sense of “realism” as literally unimaginative as most of Inception‘s production design – and, in any case, it doesn’t even come across as more realistic anyway. Haley puts on a Christian Bale Batman-like voice and the rest is down to the filmmaking, which at best is only as good as any of the old sequels.

Having said that, Freddy’s actually the only character that seems to be fully written here. In fact, at times I felt so affronted by the mehness of this version’s Nancy that I wondered why – since they changed a few other characters’ names from the original – they couldn’t have changed hers too. Perhaps the blandness of her character was deliberate, a reflection of the fact she has repressed memories of what Freddy did… it wouldn’t surprise me, and again it’d be interesting… but give me the simplicity of Heather Langenkamp as the resourceful girl next door any day over this.

As in the recent Karate Kid remake, there are direct nods to the original presumably in hopes of appeasing genuine fans of the series (honestly? I’d prefer you just make a good Freddy movie). We get Freddy’s head coming through Nancy’s wall (albeit in obvious CG), we get Tina’s bedroom death (which is actually quite terrifyingly done), we get Freddy’s claws coming up through the bathtub (but blink and you’ll miss it, it’s a much shorter scene than the original) and the girl in the school hallway… we even get what I’m sure is the power plant that featured in Nightmare 2… and the references branch out to other series: there’s a cleverly twisted version of the closet scene at the end of Halloween (Nancy hides from Freddy like Laurie did from Michael; Freddy of course, being transdimensional, simply manifests right next to her…) The little girls that were so haunting at the very end of the original (and appeared in places throughout the sequels) are here multiplied, appearing all over the place, further enhancing the new backstory. Of all the nods to the original series however, I think the best may be the score, which does its homage delicately whilst still being its own work.

In all honesty, this isn’t a terrible movie despite all that I’ve said. Like I said, more Freddy is always a good thing and I’ll gladly watch what anybody wants to do with the guy. There are standalone scenes here that are impressive – a great scene in a pharmacy, for instance, where the line between dreams and reality blurs in the way some of my favourite moments in the original series managed; or the ending which, though very similar to the cheesy “last shock” of the original, is frankly played much better here (it doesn’t look like a Tampax commercial for a start) – but the attempt to darken Freddy’s backstory is just way too overwrought and begs far too many questions for one to truly relish what ultimately plays out as the typical good versus evil of any slasher. I can’t wait for the sequel.



The A-Team [2010]

The A-Team [2010]

Monday, September 27th, 2010

Oh dear, I have no notes to go by and it’s a while since I watched this, and there’s no way I’m watching it again lol. I think I might’ve been pretty excited when I first heard this was being made… but how long ago was that? Then suddenly it was upon us. It was one of my parents who told me, after the movie had been out for weeks in the states, that Liam Neeson was Hannibal, and I honestly didn’t believe them. And yet there, in various places, were people saying Neeson was one of the best things in it.

I think Neeson is all I have to talk about with this movie. You know, I would probably want to sit here and say how “nobody could fill George Peppard’s shoes” no matter who they cast, but seriously, Liam Neeson? He literally, once again, just plays himself here: only here, that’s not a good thing. I honestly feel like I’m taking crazy pills if anybody thinks Liam Neeson is even half-good as Hannibal here, and that’s just scratching the surface of the pointlessness on display.

This is the kind of movie that’s critic proof because everyone who loves it will simply shoot you down with “it’s The A-Team, it’s SUPPOSED to be dumb, stoopid!” … well, fair enough. I would point to it’s most pathetic thread – the removal of B.A.‘s mohawk. When this first occurred, I mistakenly took issue, thinking it was the remake police ironing out one of the TV show’s most iconic features (they’d already blown up the freakin’ van, for heck’s sake) for the sake of better publicity pictures of one of its actors or something. Instead, this turns out to be a “clever” message about violence, a setting up of a new reason why this B.A. 2.0 even has a mohawk. I would ask, if this movie is supposed to be as dumb as it is elsewhere in its overlong running time, why it’s wasting time making such hokey statements?

I wouldn’t say the script is a mess so much as it’s just equally tedious. The bulk of this movie is literally just the opening credits monologue of the TV series (just to rub it in, before the end credits role, we get that “if you have problem” spiel, supposedly meant to give us oldtimers goosebumps the way, say, the same tactic did in JJ Abrams’ more deserving Star Trek reboot). It took me about half the movie to notice this, so you can imagine how annoyed I was when I did, lol. This fact alone just makes the entire movie a presumptive a**-hole … it’s just sitting there plain expecting you to buy a ticket to the sequels it’s setting up without even trying to earn its own place on your schedule. If you hadn’t figured it out yet, the movie just annoyed the living pi** out of me, and I was never even that much of a fan of the original. Next please.



The Karate Kid [2010]

The Karate Kid [2010]

Monday, September 27th, 2010

I have to start this review with my kneejerk expectations when I first heard about/saw the trailer etc for this movie. I don’t need to be reminded how great the original Karate Kid is. I love it more every time I see it. I even love its sequels… yes, the Hilary Swank one too. I grew up with them. I know that this remake isn’t for me. But knowing and feeling are separate entities, and what I felt when I first saw the trailer was irked. The “kid” was too young. He wasn’t even doing Karate (to rub it in, in one of the trailers I saw, Jackie Chan tells the boy, “I will teach you real Kung Fu…”!). He was spouting “hilarious” sh*t like “you’re like Yoda, and I’m a Jedi…”

As I often do when I’m watching a movie or thinking about how I’m gonna review a movie, I looked around for what other people are saying, sometimes to refresh or clarify the plot in my mind etc. I saw on the IMDb someone flagged up the misconception that the title is “wrong” because even though Karate isn’t practiced in the movie, it refers to what the bullies call Jaden Smith at the start. I’ll be honest, I missed that line, but I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt and still say, sorry, that’s still no excuse for the title fail.

What the title reflects is what ultimately is the movie’s only problem. It’s a movie clearly designed by a committee, afraid to offend anyone and desperate to please everyone so it stays at number one and shifts Blu-ray units. This means that though the fight scenes are surprisingly brutal (they really are), there’s no blood. It means that, though fairly minimal (a pleasant surprise in itself) we have to get those modern touches like the Star Wars line, the love interest dancing to Lady Gaga’s Poker Face, etc. But all that considered, it’s a miracle it works at all.

There are some admirable nods to the original for fans like me. Most notable is the “new” version of the famous “wax on, wax off” sequence which becomes “jacket on, jacket off” here and, I’ll be honest, works surprisingly well. The Beverly Hills apartments Ralph Macchio and mom stayed at in the original cleverly remain here despite the action being relocated to China, too. Most impressively, Jackie Chan fills the shoes of Pat Morita with the utmost reverence, completely diffusing what I thought might have been the movie’s greatest insult.

Like I said at the start, I didn’t need to be reminded how good the original was… I watch it almost every year, and genuinely believe that that movie deserves even greater stature than the same director’s more celebrated classic Rocky. Still, I’m gonna finish by saying that this remake did make me realise just how great the original was… but not in a bad way. It was only because – despite, like I say, clearly being made by a money machine – it turned out to be pretty amazing itself. It’s a rock solid effort, making up for any lack of heart with serious craftsmanship the likes of which – much as people will try complaining we do – we really don’t see a lot in movies these days. If you don’t have the same background with the original as I do, I imagine you’ll like this one very much indeed.



The Wolfman [2010]

The Wolfman [2010]

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

This is another, I feel compelled to begin by saying, that I really wasn’t over anxious to see, merely one of the more interesting looking available to me as we approached midyear and I struggled to reach a grand total of 10 in the 2010 releases I’d seen, therefore enabling me to post a top 10 list at last (additional: lol, like I said, I’m a few weeks behind… said list is coming VERY soon I swear…)

This has a hugely excruciating build to anything of note actually happening, I guess you could call it character development but it really didn’t draw me in or attach me that much to the characters. In retrospect I have to kind of admire even this aspect of the movie. It’s extraordinarily classical in its approach and really at pains to revive the old Universal horror “thing” and to me that’s something, even if it fails, that’s worth gambling on especially in as high profile a release as this.

Finally, Del Toro’s first big transformation occurs, and I have to say that at this stage I feared I was done with the movie for it’s not exactly satisfying. Coupled with the slow faux-romantic buildup, I found myself comparing it unfavourably on Twitter (live-tweeting as I often do while watching movies, it’s a nice notepad and now’s a good time to suggest you follow me there for quicker thoughts on what I’m watching!) to the Twilight movies. Like I said there, it’s almost like someone made a movie for people who hate Twilight who still for whatever reason wanna watch Twilight. (If you think that’s bad, read this … lol).

I have to say, the overriding classicism of the whole thing kinda even helped me through this. There’s a real respectfulness to this movie, with the makeup mirroring the original Karloff Lon Chaney Jr. (update: God, so sorry I left that error in here so long…) monster, the deliberation over the build before the storm, Anthony Hopkins being part his own Helsing of Coppola’s “Dracula”, part Oliver Reed in Curse of the Werewolf, part Orson Welles had he ever played such a role late in life. Even Danny Elfman’s score almost deliberately echoes Wojciech Kilar’s “Dracula” score from 1992. Charlie Chaplin’s daughter even appears in a minor role too, just in case you needed further connection to old Hollywood.

It’s after I’d made all these excuses for the movie that the unexpected occurred… a second, serious transformation, in a lecture theatre filled with skeptical scientists and Del Toro strapped to a chair. There’s literally nowhere to hide and the movie explodes right in front of you. Suddenly it’s as gory and brutal as it needs to be and I found myself loving the slow build even more.

I’ll be honest, I’d still prefer to watch Jack Nicholson and Michelle Pfeiffer in the sexy, satirical, but still homage-ridden Wolf. I count that movie in a very special horror trilogy with Francis Ford Coppola’s Dracula and Kenneth Branagh’s Frankenstein as almost all the adaptation these classic tales need, and while Del Toro’s more classical Wolfman might seem to fit better in that set than Mike Nichols’ modern take, it really doesn’t quite do it for me. I certainly can’t blame these guys for trying, but it’s something I feel could never really have worked any better than so many things that came before.



Harriet the Spy: Blog Wars

Harriet the Spy: Blog Wars

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Words can’t express how much I feared this one, but I knew I would have to watch it if only so my objections could at least be informed, lol. It sat in my collection for a few months before I finally plucked up the courage (okay, I just wanted this week to get my total 2010 movie views up to 10 so I could post a list before the middle of the year… additional: I’m running about 3 weeks behind in actually posting stuff right now so that doesn’t quite make sense lol…).

The first 5 minutes surprised me. Much of the style feels drawn straight from the (in my opinion) flawless 1997 movie by Bronwyn Hughes. It feels very much like Michelle Trachtenberg’s Harriet grown up a few years. It reminds you that, actually, that treasured first film incarnation of Louise Fitzhugh’s eponymous heroine was also a modernisation of the original, which was set in time it was written, the 1960s. Then, “Spy Teen” appears. A typical, commercial, teen movie with a heartthrobby star. The fear strikes, oh no, this über-modern Harriet is surely going to fall for him and the movie’s about to collapse. But she doesn’t… it’s hate at first sight. That’s our Harriet.

And you know what? Despite my stoic expectations that at some point it would surely turn awful somehow, for the life of me I can’t say it did. Of course it’s nowhere close to the Trachtenberg movie let alone the books… and of course I’d still prefer they never even tried this version of the story at all. But given that they did try, this is about as good as they could’ve made it. They genuinely nod their head to the ’97 version, and excuse themselves for any failing in the far worse “Spy Teen” subplot. Even on the Disney TV movie level that it stands, it’s a hell of a lot better than Camp Rock or Get a Clue, etc… but more importantly it was so better than my expectations. I mean I’d actually probably watch it again. For fun.



St. Trinian’s: The Legend of Fritton’s Gold

St. Trinian’s: The Legend of Fritton’s Gold

Monday, July 12th, 2010

As I said in my review of the first of these revivals of the old British series, I always loved the original Trinian’s movies, and since then I’ve seen them all again on DVD and can tell you I still pretty much do (some aren’t great but always fun). And I even enjoyed that first modern take on the idea… even if, to be honest, I can’t quite remember why right now. I do remember I loved the two first-years in that movie, though, and the first relief here was that they’re back… along with even more of the new intake.

For the most part, for its first half, this movie pretty much appeased my low expectations simply by being clear about its story and easy to follow, along with just a few good giggles (mostly from the younger ones, it has to be said… I can do without the “teen appeal” posing of the older set, I’m sure none of the original Trinian’s girls would’ve been seen dead in Gucci…)

Just when it began to get interesting, that is, delivering on all the setup, there’s a scene that pretty much killed it for me personally. It’s a straight up parody of The Exorcist only it actually concerns real possession, like, it’s not just done as a silly joke, it’s a plot point and everything. I know this is meant to be a silly movie, but that just seemed cheap and plain stupid. It’s not even contained to the one scene, and goes on way too long.

It picks up slightly after this but it’s a tough recovery. The final act here is practically identical to the first movie’s, with the girls descending onto London in a (pretty awesome to behold, has to be said) flashmob scene and infiltration of a Cultural Event. It feels a little lazy, but there is a least a little more from those younger girls from the first movie in this sequence. I think I was just still reeling from the terrible Exorcist gag to get back into it as much as I might’ve in the end. It’s a shame the people behind these remakes feel the need to go so low for a guaranteed laugh from the lowest common denominator etc. Likewise on the Sarah Harding casting and the “cool” treatment of the older girls. It’s way off the original concept to have such mainstream style in a St. Trinian’s movie, at least in my opinion. All this said, I’m sure I won’t be able to resist if they try again.



Fame [2009]

Fame [2009]

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Here’s another that I looked forward to for a long time once it was announced, though perhaps in a different way entirely. The trailers for this and an interview I read with its screenwriter really got my hopes up for this one, and really even as time wore on I never truly thought it was capable of being as bad as so many first expected and later reported it to be. I love the original movie, it works and I believe still would work for a teenager today who was truly interested in entering the arts; this looked simply like an attempt to update it for the X Factor generation, and I figured (and stand by this): if all it is is “better than X Factor”, then that’s better than it could’ve been.

And it is. I was really surprised by how much remains here not only in spirit but actually whole plot points etc of Alan Parker’s original movie. The grit has been removed, yes; the songs, all but one (“Out Here On My Own”), changed entirely or updated (the “Fame” remix)… amazingly, more than a few of these new songs ain’t half bad, like the replacement for “Is it Okay if I Call You Mine?” The cast of teachers: Bebe Neuwirth, Kelsey Grammer, Charles S. Dutton, the mighty Debbie Allen herself, can only be a good thing, right? And the movie still actually makes this path in life look pretty damn hard: something I really didn’t expect. In fact, I found the movie felt so little at times like it was reaching for that reality/talent show type of fame-seeking audience that I wondered who the heck it was trying to appeal to.

No, it’s not great. Yes, the original is the one you should watch. But this is so much better than it could’ve been, better than countless dance movies of the past decade, better, nay, a thousand times better, than the stage show adaptation I had the misfortune to see in the early 00s. That’s all, really: it’s not bad, and certainly not the crime it could’ve been.



Quarantine

Quarantine

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

What is there to say of this but that it’s really not as bad as it’s tempting to go in expecting. While it’s true that you will get a better experience, aside from the lipsync, by watching a dubbed version of [Rec], it’s also undeniable that the Western remake brigade could’ve got away with a lot less respect for the source than they ultimately do here. There are unnecessary changes here and there (in addition, it must be said, to some rather amazing inventions: death by camera, for instance), and the acting isn’t quite as convincing; plus there was simply something about the original being located in a literally foreign place, making the confines of the apartment block all the more alienating; but this is still a fantastic experience that made me jump more than a lot of recent horror movies. Clearly I have to recommend [Rec] first and foremost … but if you do happen to be illiterate or a Xenophobe … there are worse things you could watch.