Posts Tagged ‘rape’

Blackmail [1929]

Blackmail [1929]

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

This is immediately noteworthy not just for being Hitchcock’s first talkie but also the first ever British talkie, though that’s not the only reason for my having such a tidy breakpoint between the last Hitchcock review and this one. I would’ve probably got to this sooner were it not for there being a scene (the “Knife!” scene, no less) from the silent version on the DVD I have (in the Early Hitchcock set). The scene is so equally effective the way Hitchcock did it silently that I simply had to track down a copy of the full silent version before going any further in watching and rewatching his work.

The thing is, Hitchcock didn’t just adopt sound in his pictures willy-nilly, as easy as that might have been for him to do. Abandoning none of his learned knack for the visual, Hitchcock said much over the years of his approach to the sound component of his cinema. If he was going to have sound in his movies, it would have to contribute something and take nothing away. Just as I noted his limited use of title cards in his earlier silent work, using them only when the image didn’t say plenty, he only has his characters speak here when they have something to say.

Often the sound will even say the complete opposite of what we see, further showing how far ahead of the game Hitchcock was in his use of it. The rapist that initiates Anny Ondra’s troubles in the movie sings a perfectly jaunty song as he makes his advances. When the (still shocking now, let alone in the late Twenties) murder occurs, Hitchcock pulls the sound out entirely using silence, not sound, to enhance the suspense. And then there’s that much talked about knife scene when he simply crowns himself the master of sound, as a woman babbles on about her opinion of the murder, but the only discernible word in her dialogue is “knife” to the wild irritation of Ondra.

But as I say, the film works just as well without the sound. The story concerns Ondra’s character who finds herself subject to the blackmail of the title after someone witnesses her leaving the scene of a crime that had her murder a young artist in self-defense after he tried to rape her (this isn’t spoilers, it all happens in the first 20 minutes or so). Through all of this Hitchcock is simply brimming with visual ideas. A cunning early shot has the blackmailer see police enter his home through a tiny shaving mirror in the corner. A man is arrested and there’s a perfect dissolve from his mugshot to his fingerprint. As Ondra goes up to the rapist’s studio, we get a full cutaway view of them ascending the staircase. And as Ondra wanders the streets of London following the fateful scene, there’s all manner of tricks, including one of my faves as a neon sign advertising a cocktail shaker metamorphoses into a stabbing knife. But the best one was new to me on this viewing: an arresting visual where a the shadow of a window frame crosses Ondra’s neck like a noose as she rises, having just written a note of confession, that tells us all we need to know about her character’s genuine remorse. In the silent version of the famous “Knife!” scene, by the way, the jolting break in the scene comes, ironically, from the ringing of the shop’s doorbell. Hitchcock simply cuts to the bell ringing, and I swear you can practically hear it.

This was one of the first Hitchcock movies I saw at a time when I hadn’t seen that many old movies, let alone early talkies. It was an instant fave then and remains so now. It was fascinating to discover that the original silent version worked so well this time, though. Clearly the sound version is the one to watch, but the comparison is a fascinating one I recommend to anyone interested in this kind of thing. With a blonde central heroine and a climax at famous landmark (the British Museum), not to mention the downright dangerous framing of that blonde as a kind of anti-heroine, I feel this one is even more like the “first true Hitchcock” than The Lodger was. In any case, it’s a must see.



Bastard out of Carolina

Bastard out of Carolina

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

I know, it’s bad that I took so long to see this, and even worse that I saw Hounddog first. It boded well for this, though, that I wasn’t too impressed by Hounddog. I love Jena Malone, and the rest of the cast of this (made for TV) movie is impressive too. I have to say, though, maybe I expected too much something that was absolutely better than Hounddog from the off; and it takes a while for this one to warm up.

There are movies that touch on grey areas of what some people think is “child abuse” that kinda get on my nerves when they reach an absolute conclusion. The good (for want of a better word) news is that here there’s no such doubt here that what Malone’s character is subjected to is abuse and that the character responsible gets what he deserves. It’s very much a “powerful” movie in that slightly meaningless sense of the word that will appeal most to self-righteous couchbound social commentators (hey, whatcha lookin’ at mefer?), but it’s still far better than Hounddog and certainly better than most TV movies..



Circle of Two

Circle of Two

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

… ‘cos I may as well run with a theme. I held off watching this one last year when I was having quite the Tatum O’Neal feast while reading her autobiography because she hasn’t made a whole lot of movies and I felt like I had to save something. Though this movie sounded tacky as anything and the cheesily soft romantic opening credits did nothing to change the expectation, you kinda can’t go wrong by me if you put her and Richard Burton on screen for 90 minutes.

At least, that’s what I thought. Though initially this partnership works as expected – their first conversation in the restaurant, for instance – sadly, as this particular 90 minutes goes on, it gets more and more tiresome and unconvincing. It’s like the film makers started with a perfect pairing but are dead set on finding the sourness that just isn’t there in the actors’ chemistry. There’s a double climax sequence where first Tatum strips for Burton, and he tells her to “Get Dressed!” several times, unfortunately with a more age-appropriate suitor of hers (played by Michael Wincott of all people) peeking through the door; she flees and encounters him in a corn field of all places … “You’ll undress for anyone but me!” he declares, and then proceeds to try and rape her. It really shouldn’t be funny, but it’s such a laughable progression of incidence that it’s hard to stifle a titter. The rest of the movie flows predictably moralising the whys of why relationships like this could nevah!, evah! work.



À Ma Soeur aka Fat Girl

À Ma Soeur aka Fat Girl

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

Okay, these are kind of running together in my mind now, lol. This, the third of Catherine Braillat’s movie’s I’ve watched in the past few days, differentiates itself from the others by its violence right at the very end which I can’t deny kind of stunned me. The movie is all about this ending, not fully making sense re: why Breillat would cover the same area yet again until the very last line spoken almost direct to camera by the girl of the title. It’s kind of worth seeing once for the shock of those final moments, but what precedes them is really the same as RYG and Fillette … being more recent the production values are slightly higher but I don’t know if this is even a good thing for Breillat’s style. I’ve yet to be convinced she’s capable of anything more unique and memorable than her debut.



hounddog

hounddog

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

“I can’t shake no more …”

It’s unfortunate that a movie like this encountered such difficulty in being released, because it results in the awkward situation of people “excited” to “finally” see something that really those words should never be associated with. This unfortunacy I’ve been pondering for months now while waiting. What’s more unfortunate, however, is that in the last couple of months I’d pretty much finally heard enough to know this wasn’t anything to get excited about anyway. As I wrote in my review of The Secret Life of Bees, I’ve pretty much decided that Elle is the far more talented of the Fanning sisters. And though I’d read plenty of reviews way back on its first limited showing that it was a waste of time (though Jodie Foster’s praise of Fanning’s performance was encouraging), it was the comments from people whose opinion I more fully believed would match my own lately that kind of made me give up the anticipation.

What to say but that to begin with, at least, it is even worse than all that preamble suggests … it’s seriously wobblier than Elvis’ knees. The lack of any kind of direction in the first half hour leads me to believe that the film makers fully intended audiences to come to it as “the Dakota Fanning rape movie” and therefore sit through any duration to get to that key scene, which is just … I don’t even need to say how blank that is. Aside from a laugh-out-loud lightning incident that made me start to wonder, “wait, is this a comedy now?”, literally nothing happens until the rape. Following that scene, it must be said that the movie admirably approximates the tone and theme of Terry Gilliam’s Tideland – that a surprising amount of strength and forward momentum can come from the worst mankind is capable of, especially where children are concerned – but I’m quick to point out it never comes even close to that movie.

As to Fanning … the problem is, if this role was a challenge for her it wasn’t because of any of the sexual content. It’s because she’s portraying what amounts at best to a regular kid, at worst a simpleton, for the first time in her career – whether she succeeds or not is moot, because anybody who’s followed her work so far simply won’t believe it, because all her main roles to date have been played off her precocity. To go back to Tideland, there was something about Jodelle Ferland that worked for the similar character Jeliza Rose – she has precocity and even burgeoning sexuality like Fanning, but there’s more of a sense that she’s less aware of it or something. I won’t deny that Fanning has her moments here, most particularly her longer singing scene following the rape – something that begins looking slightly ridiculous turns into something that almost makes the movie into something worthwhile. But it’s really got nothing on her past performances.

Anyway, the short version is, it wasn’t worth waiting for. Lay the absolutely awful twangly score on the top of all this and you almost have just about the worst movie I’ve looked forward to seeing in a long time, to be honest. Maybe if it weren’t for Tideland and the wait I’d be more lenient … but what can you do?



Doomsday

Doomsday

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

If I was the kind of person who walked out of / switched off movies, and lord how I wish I was sometimes, I would’ve been done with this around the hour mark. It fits the mould of the Grindhouse movies, particularly Planet Terror, but like, in a really, really bad, sad, pathetic wannabe British way.

I really don’t want to write what I really think of this movie because I did so and I read it back and I just don’t want the feedback that what I wrote might trigger. That some people might get some enjoyment out of this movie doesn’t bug me. That someone like Neil Marshall can make such a movie and still somehow be regarded as a gem in the British film industry … no matter how much I may try to distance myself from the herdlike mindset of the masses … it still makes me feel ashamed to be alive.

I’m inclined to add somewhere here, “y’know what, it’s just not for me,” but I’m sick of it. I’m sick of it being somehow okay for people to get a kick out of shit like this while I and others get regarded as sickeningly weird for, relatively speaking, reasons that couldn’t be more innocuous.

‘kay, like I said I didn’t even intend to include those last few sentences, but I couldn’t bring myself to delete them anyway. I’m not sickened this way by many things. I laugh at people who are sickened by such things in such a way. But I don’t know what else to say about this movie. It just made me wanna die, and right now all I wanna do is get any words I have about it published so I can move on. And for the record, I wrote the bulk of this long before this past weekend’s events. Thank God I didn’t watch it after, or I mightn’t be here at all.



Redbelt

Redbelt

Friday, July 18th, 2008

“There’s no one here but the fighters.”

I was pretty damn loathe to watch this without any prior knowledge of what it was about etc after Spartan completely failed to ignite me. That I’ve been terrible at keeping up the movie-watching habit lately (I’ll get better soon, I promise) made me even more apprehensive: I thought a stupid comedy might’ve been an easier option to get me writing again.

But dammit, it’s Mamet. I decided that if this movie couldn’t hold my attention then there must clearly be something wrong with me or it, lol, and I dove in. The opening credits didn’t let me down – all the names you want in a Mamet movie, Rebecca Pidgeon, Ricky Jay, a couple of surprises in Tim Allen and Jennifer Grey, the brilliant Robert Elswitt on photography duties. And then the madness begins.

The movie is pretty convoluted for the first 40 minutes. Speaking of Elswitt, the quirkiness of the plot points actually kind of reminded me of Paul Thomas Anderson. A strange and frazzled girl walks out of the rain into a martial arts place and almost shoots a police officer and we’re just expected to accept that “these crazy things happen all the time” as the Magnolia narrator might say. The moment is “forgotten” and we move onto something else. I think the one reason none of this bugged me because it was scored – yes, scored, I think that’s the only word for it – at all times by Mamet’s unmistakably perfect dialogue (something else that’s familiar in Anderson movies, in fact – I don’t think I’d ever entirely made the connection). It’s like Brian De Palma’s Snake Eyes plus the old world meets new world ways of Ronin meets Rocky and Mamet’s edge.

But fear not, because it all comes together in the end, in more astonishingly powerful ways than I’d ever have seen coming. The strange girl turns out to be an attorney who has issues with physical contact after being attacked before the story begins. There’s a scene where a trainer from the martial arts place at the start, our hero Chiwetal Ejiofor, who must surely be headed for an Oscar some day if not today, breaks through the wall and holds her in exactly the way she doesn’t want in order to help her. It’s an outstanding scene ending in the line above that speaks volumes about how the good guys, the honest guys, maybe avoid such confrontations too much. The movie is ultimately about having enough of the bullsh*t and speaking the truth and it’s done in such an overwhelmingly brisk and unique fashion … one should expect no less from David Mamet, but like I said, after Spartan … it’s practically phenomenal. Double bill it with In Bruges. Even I’m inclined to dub it a “man movie” despite it’s leanings towards very womanly issues in that attorney subplot that really made the movie for me – those two times Ejiofor and the attorney touch are cinema at its best to me.



Once Upon a Time in America

Once Upon a Time in America

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

“He’s altogether lovable
But he’ll always be a two-bit punk
So he’ll never be my beloved.
What a shame.”

Parts of this almost provoke the same reaction I sometimes have to parts of Leon, the boyish gangsterry action dialogue etc. There’s something almost frighteningly misogynistic about it that seems to strike me more each time I watch it and kinda makes the fact it’s regarded so much as a classic without this element being raised for discussion so much just a little unnerving. I still find the rape towards the end physically impossible to watch in its entirety. But it’s not just that scene – an earlier scene, possibly a couple, show women clearly enjoying the sickening treatment they’re subjected to à la Straw Dogs – right at the start a minor character seems far more aroused than frightened by the cold touch of a gun on her nipple.

There are hints throughout that all this is just a character thing and that I probably shouldn’t be so bugged by it – I love Robert De Niro’s line when he gets re-acquainted with a girl they rape while robbing a bank. She comes on to him personally, but he turns her down, adding, “Besides if I gave you a good crack in the mouth I’m afraid you’d probably like it.” I mean, there are women like this in the world, sad but true, it reminds me of that, “What is it with women like you?” scene in Pay it Forward. But I don’t know, these moments still don’t sit entirely right with me. It’s just an issue of balance, I think.

On which point, of course, there’s Deborah. Played so memorably at first by Jennifer Connolly first as the girl Noodles will never have, though she certainly wants him her sights are set so high on her future. That line above, that whole monologue, it’s like over half the movie to me, a little like Estella’s treatment of Pip in Great Expectations, how many young relationships go this way, “I like you. But you smell,” etc (oversimplified perhaps but you get the gist). Later she’s played even more beautifully by Elizabeth McGovern, the slight European twinge to her accent distancing her from the grown Noodles even more, “Where’d you learn all that parlez-vous stuff?” he asks her when they finally go on a date towards the end – the most beautiful scene imaginable made almost as unwatchable as what follows when you know where the evening leads. In that awful scene in the car, she’s not only losing her dignity, possibly even her virginity; she’s losing him, any idea of his good side she has slips away forever. He becomes just the two-bit punk to her, and I find that the most crushing part of the movie, that finality of a stupid action in determining where a friendship or even love will go or terminate (yeh, I guess it goes without saying – I’ve been there – not as severe but I’ve definitely been stupid, who hasn’t?).

Anyway, even despite my discomfort, it is a true masterpiece, I wish I had the time to write a much longer and better review than this. All cut versions of the movie should be destroyed – really, do yourself a favour and see the 4 hour cut (I think by now that’s the more easily available version anyway but it still needs signposting lol). I’ve literally only focussed on the Deborah and Noodles thread here because it’s the part that pierced my heart the very first time I saw it and that stuck with me all these years. But there’s so much more. The Charlotte Russe scene, the Clockwork Orange styled baby swap, Danny Aiello’s wonderful turn as the police chief (called Aiello, LOL) they give it up the ass to, lol. It’s perfect.