Posts Tagged ‘Pixar’

Toy Story 3

Toy Story 3

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

This is one of those reviews that’s kind of easy to write but at the same time kinda hard. Easy because I know exactly what I thought of it, hard because it’s all been said up to a month previously by other people, lol. As you probably have heard, this is pretty much one of the best movies of the year, it’s practically unanimous, and I’m glad to say that for once I agree with such a widespread view.

It’s kind of crazy to think that I’ve now seen every part of this trilogy in the cinema and even when I saw the first one, I wasn’t exactly a kid at 15. I remember taking my sister to see it, I remember loving the music (I was into all Disney music bigtime at the time) but probably more than anything revelling in the sheer hi-techery of the whole thing (“the whole movie was made on a computer!!”)

When Toy Story 2 was released, I forget what level of anticipation I really had for it. I was in the middle of college and pretty much high on Disney after Tarzan (I’d end up doing my final dissertation on Disney). What I remember is badly wanting my own Jessie doll after the movie, her story being the one that really resonated most with me.

I saw the first part again when it was re-released in 3D… part two never made it to our cinema in that form, or I just missed it, but these are movies that are always fresh in my mind. The 3D worked, I thought, pretty well in that re-release, but more than anything it was just awesome to see it on a huge screen again, and projected digitally. It felt strangely pure or something (as opposed to, say, a 70mm oldie being projected digitally).

I didn’t necessarily doubt this installment would be as great as people were saying (I’d seen the trailer and it really boded well on the emotional front). But having recently seen that first one and once again realise just how perfect it is, on top of the wonders that Pixar have given us even in the 11 years since part 2, I didn’t put my expectations too high.

Well I’ve seen Toy Story 3 twice now… first in a dodgy download version because I simply needed to see it before I read too much about it and spoiled it for myself. I trusted, as I always do, that if the movie was as good as people were saying, the quality of the presentation would not make a huge difference to the story, and I wasn’t wrong. Like many people, I bawled not just like a baby but like someone with serious mental problems LOL.

This movie has some serious emotional weight, like the most recent of Pixar’s productions Wall•E and Up. What’s different here, however, is how those emotions are spread throughout the picture. There are two intense emotional beats towards the end of the movie, but the melancholic undertones are there right from the moment (after a “fantasy” opening similar to the way the first two movies open) we re-enter Andy’s bedroom, through the POV of his mom holding a video camera.

I won’t talk about those two parts at the end, except to say that they worked just as well on my flat laptop screen as they did in enormous 3D. My opinion of 3D remains the same as I think I’ve said before, and it’s just exactly the same as my opinion of seeing movies on the big screen in general. It’s always nice to see movies larger than life, but it’s simply not always possible. Almost all of us have more favourite movies that we’ve never seen on the big screen than ones that we have, so I’m pretty sure we can all agree that if a movie is good enough it doesn’t necessarily need a big screen projection. It’s nice, it adds to the experience, it immerses you more, but it doesn’t change the quality of the film.

I’m still only giving the movie 4 hearts right now because I’m remembering the original and how absolutely perfect that was right down to the screenplay structure etc, and I feel like to a certain extent those massive emotional punches at the end throw this instalment off-balance in a similar way to those last two Pixar productions I mentioned (though by nowhere near as much… plus they made me cry a lot more). I’m in near total agreement however with those calling the trilogy as it stands one of the best trilogies of all time. The consistency over 15 years really is incredible, not to mention the sheer uniqueness of this world… and while I’ve really focussed like everyone else on the huge emotional impact of this one, it has just as much excitement, humour, thrills and invention as the others.

I wanted to say something about Jessie but I can’t find anywhere above to slip it in lol. Like I said I had a huge crush on Jessie after the second movie, and she had the big emotional moment of that movie that really made me love it most, in her backstory with Emily (cleverly echoed here in Lotso’s story; though Lotso of course reacts very differently to being left behind). I had actually almost forgotten how much I loved her so much that she wasn’t even a factor in my excitement about seeing part 3. Then she appeared and I just fell in love all over again. There’s more made of the funny relationship between her and Buzz that began in the second movie, and in the midst of this are some insanely stylised, romantically-lit shots of her that just wowed me. It’s her face that really carries the first of those aforementioned emotional punches at the end and all I need to do is recall that face and her hand reaching out to start crying all over again. This is a wonderful, wonderful addition to a practically perfect series of movies. But you know that already.

Oh yes: another extra thing to mention as I won’t write it anywhere else… moreso for me than the 3D among reasons to see this movie on the big screen is the short that precedes it. I always forget that Pixar put these shorts before all their features and this one like so many of them is so great it threatens to supplant the memory of the movie. It’s called “Day & Night” and combines 2D and 3D animation in an ingenious way that really can’t be described well to anyone who hasn’t seen it. It’s about conflicting ideas and perspectives from the broadest scale to the most specific (you could argue it’s simply about the co-existence of 2D and 3D cinema). It has insane technique and a great message in the perfect balance that the best of Pixar has to offer. I’ll be very disappointed if it isn’t at least nominated for an Oscar next year (likewise, of course, the feature it precedes!)



Up

Up

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

I’m loathe to say it, but even on a second viewing (which I felt necessary for this movie before reviewing), I still had a real failure of disbelief suspension in parts that made total connection with the movie ultimately impossible, thus preventing me from giving it the high rating that’s best moments have me wishing I could give. Don’t get me wrong – Up is a beautiful movie, and if it turns out to be the first computer animated movie to be nominated for Best Picture as I’ve heard it might, I’ll be pleased (heck, anything’s better than 4/5 of last year’s nominees) – but there is a definite, undeniable lack of consistency here which I’ve felt before in Pixar movies but never so much as I did here.

It begins, as you’ve probably heard, with a sweeping view of the “curmudgeonly” (as he appears in the trailer: actually, I was pleasantly surprised by how lovable and involved the character is) hero’s life up to, as Simon Mayo and Mark Kermode might describe it, an “unpleasant event” which I won’t reveal except to say that the cut that follows the end of this opening is really where my problem with the movie begins. It’s a tactless cut, from 10 minutes of film making that has been proven to make the most hardened viewer bawl their eyes out, that those children who actually understand it will need days to recover from, into quirky, light comedy. I found myself even on the second viewing at this point wanting to shake the screen, “you just can’t do this following what you just showed me!”

But settle into the rest of the story you must, and what lies beyond this heartbreakingly real opening is a world you really couldn’t foresee. The trailer shows all of the unlikely rabble you’ll meet joining our elderly hero as he tries to navigate his balloon-lifted house to a “land lost in time” where he and his childhood sweetheart once dreamed they’d live. There’s an overweight scout just looking to get his “assisting the elderly” badge, a giant and ludicrously colourful bird and a dog equipped with a hi-tech collar that enables him to talk.

It’s not the unlikely nature of these characters’ presence that bugged me, and I grew to love all of them and they all have moments that hook into the movie’s foremost philosophy. What bothers me is that none of this gels with the genuinely gutwrenching reality of the way the story starts. There’s nothing to suggest, in the manner of The Wizard of Oz did, say, that when Carl’s house takes off that we’ve entered any kind of fantasy; and there’s so much that follows this point, slapdash treatment of physics etc (Carl seems unbelievably spritely considering he relies so much on a stick, eg), that really took me out of the flow of the movie. I know that some reading this will feel I’m being even more curmudgeonly than Carl seems in the trailer … but I don’t say this like it totally ruined the movie for me, because it didn’t; I won’t, however, avoid saying it just because I know how those people will read it. I just would’ve expected Pixar to make all of these shifts in tone, from the absurdly distressing to the distressingly absurd, gel better. It’s not the first time, either.

It’s hard to get mad at the movie, though, and while other computer animated (especially 3D) movies are still being made that rely on the tried and true combined with celebrity voices, you have to bow down to Pixar for continuing to make movies like this that make you think, while the end credits roll, “I can’t believe they got away with selling that as a kids movie,” lol. It is, if only for it’s most emotional moments, easily one of the studio’s best; but like so many of their “best” (for me, they have yet to top Finding Nemo) it’s mostly of predictably high quality. Pixar have such a high and consistent standard I feel compelled to demand more from them. They have proven over and over that they have enormous reserves of creativity and originality, but here more than anywhere it feels like they have just thrown it slapdash at a wall with little of the old Disney storytelling machine to hold it together. I would love if they would try to reign it in and try to distill it down more for their next project, because they really should be making flawless movies by now.



Wall·E

Wall·E

Monday, October 6th, 2008

Okay, we may be entering the realm of reviews that I actually started, so they might be getting longer, hehe …

But it almost pains me to say, what can be said of this that hasn’t yet been said? I know, it’s taken me an unforgivable amount of time to see it. But it’s Pixar … their reliability level is almost boringly, consistently, humblingly high, I think I’ve said before. There are other animation mediums thankfully creeping back out of the woodwork lately after a decade of CG holding centre stage (Disney’s own stuff to come in the next couple of years fascinates me it looks like the ArtRage of computer animation lol) – but when it comes to computer animation, Pixar really does unfailingly put the other companies to abject shame, and Wall•E is no exception.

What struck me most about the movie I think was how much bleaker it was even than I’d been told. Right from the opening, the empty scenes of desolation that Wall•E rolls through to Thomas Newman’s lonely score, it’s extremely unnerving and frighteningly believable as to a place we could be headed. Once the movie goes into space, I actually found myself momentarily feeling very wrong indeed at the portrayal of today’s lazy humanity’s ultimate destination. It’s astounding that a movie that on its very surface is so scathing can still win its audience over with humour and emotion through a couple of hunks of metal.

For me it easily beats Cars and The Incredibles (sorry Vi!) – perhaps not Ratatouille though the running time helps it in the repeat viewing zone. I’m not sure if it’s up there with Andrew Stanton’s own Finding Nemo. I personally wasn’t impressed a few years ago when people wowed at the expressionless emotion of Gromit in Curse of the Were-Rabbit but the amount of emotion gleaned here from glances and gestures is frequently overwhelming.

A lot of reviews I’ve read or heard talked about the basically silent first half and seemed disappointed by the second half where it’s a little more traditionally Pixar but I really didn’t feel that – and the moment at the end where the “lovers” are finally together on the same page just melted me completely, the silence, stillness, and slowness of that moment are just astonishing – nevermind for a “kids” movie … for any movie today. There’s tons of competition coming up as the Oscars approach, but I’m still standing by my theory that this year will be a more commercial contest after 2 years of bolder film making taking the cake; my beloved Mamma Mia! predix may be dreamy, but this one certainly seems like it has a shot at being the second animated feature ever to be nominated for Best Pic.



Ratatouille

Ratatouille

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

I really wasn’t too excited about this one following the less than engrossing Cars. Even though I love food, I love cooking food, I love watching people cook; it seemed like an even stranger start-point for a Pixar movie than the last one. However, for at least the first hour here, I was completely enraptured by the smoother-than-ever animation, the truly humble voicework; and when the food started being thrown around, in the gorgeously rendered digital Paris? Let’s just say this one certainly has more than its share of moments that more than match the best parts of the Toy Stories, Finding Nemo, and Monsters Inc.

It’s not without its flaws. I didn’t really buy the whole Remy-controlling-Linguine thing, it got a little annoying at times. And I don’t mean like, I have problems suspending my disbelief kind of way – it’s just, alongside the much more subtle, even beautiful, way the unlikely pair first communicate, it’s just that bit too farfetched by comparison. Like Cars, too, it’s certainly a little overlong, and there’s a good slog in the second half that had me squirming a little for something to happen.

But then there’s all the good. I loved the vertically challenged head chef – everytime he thought he’d seen a rat he totally reminded me of Herbert Lom in the Pink Panther movies, and a quick Google search tells me I’m not alone in noticing this. Michael Giacchino’s score is sheer perfection, way better than his work on The Incredibles which I personally wasn’t as overwhelmed by as some.

Overall, this is a step up for Pixar following Cars, that’s for sure. It’s a movie I will certainly watch more than a few times again, and I think the highest praise from me must be that I won’t be too crushed if it beats out Meet the Robinsons at next year’s Oscars for the Best Animated Feature award. I only wish there’d been more of the digital Paris. They could’ve almost just had a virtual camera roaming the streets of that model for 2 hours to Giacchino’s music and I would’ve been in heaven.



Toy Story 2

Toy Story 2

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007

I’d totally forgotten how fantastic this movie was – I thought it was all about Jessie and the “When She Loved Me” sequence for me, but everything that surrounds those (I have to say) highlights is more frenetic, hysterical (“It’s the chicken man!” “Look, Barbie – a big ugly man doll!” lol), and, even on an umpteenth viewing, still shockingly more poignant than I ever expect.

But like I said, this movie kind of needs go no further for me than the character of Jessie – there are little quirks here like the kinda-half-dance she does on the turntable after she gets the hang of the motion, the pulling-her-hat-down-over-her head thing, that just touch me somewhere that an animated doll in all reason shouldn’t be able to touch, lol – and the whole “When She Loved Me” sequence, Emily growing, the horses turning to nail polish, that is one of the most beautiful, crushing, painfully truthful 3 minutes Pixar have ever produced … I think maybe it got me even more today because it’s been a long time not only since I watched the movie but even longer since I watched it alone, and it’s one of those sequences, you just wanna be alone, curled up in the dark, crying to that song. I do, anyway. But there’s always the thrilling climax and all the other wonderful stuff I’m too lazy to mention if that isn’t your thing :) This is just a beautiful movie that takes my breath away every time.



The Incredibles

The Incredibles

Sunday, March 20th, 2005

My third review in practically as many months – I must like this movie or something. It just gets better with each viewing. One thing I hadn’t noticed until now on DVD is the movie’s fairly astonishing length of just under 2 hours: very rare in animated movies, and considering the size of this movie, it’s a brave (or insane) bunch of animators, film makers, and technicians that decided to make this thing.

I still can’t take my eyes off Violet, my favourite character. I can just relate to her so much. She alone puts the movie among my all-time favourites. I love how everything about her indicates something about her. Her name, Violet, shrinking violet; her long black hair always there for her to hide behind; her superpowers, invisibility (hiding again) and force field (even more protection from the harsh weird world). I realise that all the characters are built in this way, but it’s Violet that I really connect to. Sarah Vowell’s voice is beautiful, too. I love Violet’s gawkish movements. One thing I always hate about computer animation is that for some reason characters’ motions always appear stilted. Small gestures can work really well, but running and walking and stuff almost never works. Violet is a major exception. I love the expression on her face while trying to make a forcefield around a crashing plane; and again when she’s practicing her skills around a campfire; the way she prods the Omnidroid’s remote manically, not knowing what to do, but knowing that something must be done. That’s Violet in a nutshell, really: she has power and responsibility for the first time in her life, she just doesn’t know what to do with it. She’s simultaneously inquisitive and terrified.

I do find the movie’s message a little weird. I first read, I think, on the IMDb message boards, what I first considered as a case of a person reading way too much into a movie, but you don’t really have to look far into it to see this odd message – Buddy/Syndrome actually begins with noble aspirations, he just wants to be a superhero like his heroes, and he works I’m guessing fairly hard at making pretty stunning inventions, rocket boots etc, to the point where he actually has real power, only nobody ever recognises his talent and encourages it towards good use, not even Mr. Incredible, who tells Syndrome as a boy to just go home. There’s no wonder he rebels. The final message of the movie seems to be very cynical indeed – that some people are just plain “better” than others, and nobody should ever bother trying to break into that clique, because they’ll probably just be mistaken as a villain anyway. It does strike me as a little snobbish.

Is it enough to take away from my enjoyment of the movie? I think it might actually make the movie better. It’s one of those complicated things that makes a movie come over different on every viewing. One time I may see it as a negative, sad interpretation of the world; another I might see it is gleefully cynical and true. In any case, on every viewing there’ll always at least be the animation, music, and production design (the latter two should definitely have both been nominated for Oscars, btw). And of course, my little shameful virtual crush, Violet.

The DVD is the usual expected from Disney/Pixar – you get about an hour of behind-the-scenes stuff, a bunch of deleted scenes at various stages of completion, “Jack-Jack Attack”, a short which reveals exactly what happened with Jack-Jack and Kari, “Boundin’”, the short that played before The Incredibles in cinemas, which comes with a commentary by the director and a little featurette about him, and Easter Eggs on pretty much every screen of Disc 2 (just wait for the Omnidroid icon to appear). I wish there was more artwork on the disc – usually I hate stills galleries, but I would have loved to see more of Violet’s character development, and flyarounds of the sets and characters as they had on the Toy Story discs. Two commentaries and a preview of Cars are on disc one, plus a funny intro where Brad Bird bitches about fullscreen chopping.

–––––––––––––

5th December ’04:

Maybe it’s because I watched it directly after The Polar Express, which was such a disappointment, or maybe it’s because for the past 2 weeks I’ve been slightly insanely obsessing over Violet and it was a thrill to see her again, maybe it’s because I watched it at 7am after being up all night (maybe these things all roll into one…). I have a feeling this movie’s going to continue to get better with subsequent viewings.

I still feel there’s something missing from The Incredibles, and I noticed even more this time the similarities to movies past: Spy Kids being the most notable, and the sound effects were a little too annoyingly Star Wars-ish for my liking in places.

But this is an astonishing movie in a lot of ways, many I clearly missed the first time around. The whole plane crash sequence made my jaw drop a little on the virgin viewing, but this time I was mesmerised by the number of things being handled onscreen, and finally by the amazing water effects, including the wet hair on all the characters.

I pretty much spent this viewing gawping at the quality of the animation (or grinning at Violet when she was on :-p), so I’ll probably pick up on plenty more story and character things next time.

–––––––

11th November ’04

How can I possibly call this movie a disappointment? I can’t. Yet it’s no Finding Nemo, and I have to point this out since I read some interview with the director Brad Bird (whose The Iron Giant was a masterpiece, one of my top 100 movies of all time) where he said something along the lines of “if The Incredibles makes less than Finding Nemo it’s the end of Pixar”. And really, The Incredibles does not deserve to make as much as Nemo. I’m really beginning to worry for Pixar – I saw the trailer for Cars moments before seeing The Incredibles and all I can say for that movie is that perhaps it will pave the way for an animated version of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Starlight Expressif it’s a success.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with The Incredibles. It just feels to me like Pixar is resting on its laurels, much like Disney have done too many times before. We knew they were capable of this; usually they surprise us with new capabilities. The story here is simple, the beginnings of a franchise if ever there were one; the character designs are awesome – between Violet’s hair and Mom’s ass I have a year’s worth of visual praise; what’s missing is the great visual gags, and superb characterisation and story of Nemo, Monsters and the Toy Storys.

But though I can’t overpraise it at all, I really can’t dismiss it for the things I loved; its few precious moments still overwhelm most recent movies, and honestly, Mom’s butt is a sight of realism to behold.



Finding Nemo

Finding Nemo

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2004

Officially speaking, this is a virgin viewing. I downloaded the movie around the time of its theatrical release but it was either a workprint (‘cos I’m pretty sure there were scenes on the final cut, this DVD, that I hadn’t seen before, all through the movie) or just a version that failed to include the opening (which I had definitely not seen before, the whole Nemo’s mother bit, I never even saw Coral, lol)… either way, at least I’m legal again now, I purchased the DVD, Disney/Pixar have their money :-p

This is the best animated movie ever made to date. I say that even at the same time as maintaining movies like Spirit and Tarzan among my own personal all-time faves, and keeping those two in particular up top of my listing… but technically speaking, as far as animation is concerned, this movie is the all-time best, like, technically speaking, say, Citizen Kane is the greatest live action. The colour is simply incredible, the rendering of the CG imagery, just, everything, is the absolute pinnacle of achievement in this field. This is the first truly worthy recipient of Best Animated Feature at the Oscars. Andrew Stanton certainly received the biggest honour he could have for this movie, but I would add too, that this movie has the second best screenplay of all-time, perhaps even a tie, next to Back to the Future, in my opinion, just the basic use of storytelling… not clever screenwriting like something like Fargo or The Big Sleep or Chinatown or The Usual Suspects, all great screenplays, but this, along with Back to the Future, just tells a story, cinematically, perfectly. Stanton should have received this award too. It owes a lot to Hitchcock, like Back to the Future did (it contains at least two straight homages, to Psycho and The Birds, but plenty more is indebted to Hitch).

It’s beautiful, and when you compare it to Disney’s own releases post-Tarzan, you can understand and appreciate why Pixar have ditched Disney… I cannot wait for their future productions. It’s like they have literally stolen the magic of Disney for themselves… these guys know how to make a “Disney movie”… only now it’s Pixar.

One thing I would add, just a personal note really ‘cos I know exactly the reason the movie didn’t end this way, it just wouldn’t sit with most people… but I felt this on the “first” viewing and again on this viewing. I may be morbid… but I think the movie would be that bit more powerful and would probably still work for the audience it has and yet draw a whole other audience, if Nemo had actually died at the end. If I’d had anything to do with the story sessions for the movie, I’d have been first to argue this to the point of being fired, ‘cos I think it really would add a lot to the resonance of the movie. They make you think he’s dead… they make you anticipate your own reaction to his death, it works pretty well for that… but y’know, it’d just be so moving if he’d actually sacrificed himself, for Dory, his new mother, that Marlon let him go ‘cos for once he was being trusting… it’d just be really complex and true to life and… blah… I just feel it would have made the movie even beyond the perfect it already is :)

This is going to go up and up in my opinion on each viewing. It’s relentlessly entertaining, and artistically as perfect as possible.