Posts Tagged ‘dream’

S. Darko

S. Darko

Monday, May 18th, 2009

This was a lot better than I expected and reading other people’s reviews of it proved very interesting indeed. One of the first bad reviews I found said the following:

“To me this movie felt like someone watched Donnie a few times, wrote down some key elements from the movie in a notebook and then tried to incorporate it into a new movie.”

What can I say but I’m glad if this was the way they approached it. I have no time for those who think they can fathom the mystery of the original movie. Richard Kelly ruined it with his own director’s cut in my opinion. The mystery was key for me. For me, the things you need to fairly compare this straight to video sequel to are not the original theatrical cut of Donnie Darko (which it could never match) but other straight to video sequels, Richard Kelly’s demented director’s cut of the original, and Kelly’s own output since his ingenius debut. On all those counts, this for me easily comes out on top.

If you had any great love for the director’s cut of Donnie Darko over the original, clearly, this is not for you. You probably love the abundance of exposition in The Da Vinci Code and (I’m told) its sequel. I’m personally a fan of abstract cinema, believe it’s something that cinema does particularly well in fact, and to find that in a movie like this which on the surface at times looks as shallow as The OC or something is a huge relief. Like I said, it’s no Donnie, it couldn’t be. But it is beautifully produced, even the music being impressive; it has many parallels to the original story without being 100% rehash; and for a moment or two at least it even took my breath away a little. The ending kind of fizzles rather than blazes as it should and it’s an homage to the original too far that just doesn’t work, but otherwise, for what it is, I was very impressed with this movie.

(PS. Another of the reviews I just read said it was ‘worse than Grease 2 …’ which to my ears is really counter-productive, lol)



Alice in Wonderland [1951]

Alice in Wonderland [1951]

Monday, May 5th, 2008

Of course, as the Disney version, this is the best-known, most-loved, most stylised and standardised of all the adaptations. As far as I know, it was likely my only source of the story for a good chunk of my life, and by that I mean, I don’t even remember reading or being read the book (sniff lol): I only realised this past week reading the first of the books that parts of this and the other adaptations, like Tweedledum and Tweedledee for example, were in fact taken from “Through the Looking Glass” which I’ve yet to read. In this version, in fact, they even pull in a couple of elements from Carroll’s “Jabberwocky”, as well as throwing in some genuinely clever characters and lines of their own (“You gave me quite a turn!” “She’s stark raven mad!”) … all in 70 minutes. I still prefer the Fiona Fullerton version by a smidgen, and who knows what Tim Burton’s going to deliver, but this is one of Disney’s best, it’s eyepoppingly colourful particularly when you consider the year it was made, and the character designs etc certainly stick in one’s memory.



Alice in Wonderland [1966]

Sunday, May 4th, 2008

This one is fascinating – another TV production, this time by the BBC for the “Wednesday Play” series, and boy does that show: the word “pretentious” certainly comes to mind but I for one won’t be using it because this is one of the best adaptations of the book that I’ve yet seen. It begins by perfectly recreating the part of the story that has always been the most strongly evocative part to me: the simple, lazy image of Alice and her sister on the bank on a hazy Summer afternoon (“All in a golden afternoon …”). From there it launches into some of the most surreal, dreamlike progressions I’ve ever seen on film. It captures some part of the book that few other adaptations would dare. Through clever editing, it’s the closest and most prolonged replica of the dream experience I’ve seen.

I wouldn’t have thought it, as I’m quite attached to the innocent and gracious image of Alice in the blue dress with blonde hair in a bow etc, but I quite like this Hermione-haired, black-dressed, aloof version as played by Anne-Marie Mallik, too; I love how she’s always walking away from people with a “hmph!” flick of her hair. The look she almost gives the camera as the caucus-race “winners” gather around uttering, “prizes, prizes, prizes”, quite like zombies droning, “brains”, lol, is quite priceless, it’s the look of a person bemused by the herd-like behaviours of society.

In short, what it lacks in colour, effects, costumes and comprehensiveness, it makes up for entirely with the feeling it gives by the extraordinary stillness, both in the image and in the soundtrack, Mallik’s whispery distant voiceover, and that very BBC “Play for Today” type score (excepting the odd moment when it, like the imagery, goes a little mental). At 70 minutes, there’s no excuse to pass up the chance to see it.



Alice in Wonderland [1999]

Sunday, May 4th, 2008

I love Tina Majorino in just about anything so I kind of knew that I’d be comfortable through most of this despite some bad comments about it (Martin Gardner calls it “undistinguished” and “boring” in “The Annotated Alice” and considering how great his insights are in the margins of that volume, I couldn’t well not believe him). With the book very fresh in my mind (I just finished reading it minutes before putting this on), I was pretty dazzled by how faithful it is to the text (to “Wonderland” at least; I can’t speak for the episodes towards the end I’m assuming are from “Through the Looking Glass”, which I’ve not yet read). That, however, turns out to perhaps be the production’s singular problem. There’s a fine line between being faithful and too damn literal, and this certainly crosses that line eventually.

As expected, I found Majorino delightful as Alice (I don’t like the yellow dress though :P ) – her English accent is a little too clipped at times but mostly it’s perfect, as is she. The rest of the cast is certainly impressive (how often do you find Ken Dodd, Martin Short and Gene Wilder in the same place, lol?) but often just plain annoying; for me nothing much compares to the fantastic supporting cast of the Fiona Fullerton version. The visual effects are fairly clunky at times and the production and costume design etc (I already mentioned the yellow dress) is some of the most garish and unappealing I’ve seen in any artwork based on the story – towards the end, in fact, it almost looks like they’re running out of money by the scene. For Majorino and the details in the script, however, it’s certainly worth seeing if you’ve read and enjoyed the source material.



The Last Temptation of Christ

The Last Temptation of Christ

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

I don’t think I’ll have seen this since I was about 16 so maybe it makes sense just how much of it felt new to me this time around, not to mention how I couldn’t have hoped to understand it that first time watching. All I really recalled, and even that only partially, was the last 20 minutes or so, the “last temptation” itself – when the movie really deviates and, I guess, causes offense to some. But while this movie even opens with a scroll disclaiming any direct association with the Gospels (and, you’ve gotta give it kudos, warning that it will be more a discussion than a storytelling session), it’s pretty amazing how faithful it is to the big story, right down to details like the guard’s ear in Gethsemene, stuff that’s cut out of other retellings so often that I’d forgotten it entirely since whatever Sunday school type affair taught it to me lol :) Take that last temptation as a dream sequence, which is I think a perfectly valid interpretation of it, and I really don’t see the offense at all.

For a late Eighties production, it’s gotta be said up front, the production values are beyond astounding. One of the things that struck me most about it this time around is how for some unknown reason it never once feels like by rights it should – that is, not to sound condescending or anything, but, like a bunch of Americans doing the Crucifixion story, lol. It almost wouldn’t have felt out of place if Robert De Niro had shown up in a key role here. There’s just something about the way Scorsese pulls it all together, Peter Gabriel’s score over the top, I don’t know. I don’t know if the fact that even David Bowie makes a better Pontius Pilate here than James Nesbitt in the recent BBC production is indicative of just how awful that Beeb casting was (like we need more proof – I was thinking just this afternoon how the only way they could possibly have made their production original would be to finally have a black Jesus …) or again of how surprisingly well this production falls together considering the elements.

At the center of that “bunch of Americans” is Willem Dafoe, and I think in him I may have found my personal favourite movie Jesus. I believe him, to a frightening extent. I’ve always said that I’m more a fan of the musical versions of this story, but this version quite literally overwhelmed me at times. It’s the way in which it brings logic to the table with almost insane calculation – he was a carpenter, we’ve heard, but this suggests he may have built the very crosses he and his fellow Jews were crucified on; when he preaches to a crowd, this version gives him dissenters, not unanimous adulation; when he carries the cross, it’s only part of the cross, when he’s crucified, he’s bone naked; even when it comes to those last ethereal 20 minutes or so, the logic applied takes my breath away … that God would kill Mary, that Saul/Paul would invent the Jesus we know of even if he had fallen to that last temptation. This production has the kind of issues behind it that all religious movies should have – it’s the questioning we all have for it all. It shows what, perhaps, Jesus really sacrificed up there on the cross.

I know that last sentence makes me sound way too much like the kind of religious nut I can’t stand; the weird thing of all this is that I don’t consider myself religious in the slightest – like Jesus says here, “God is not an Israelite!” and too many people claim him for themselves, and that’s my problem so I just say there’s a Higher Power and that’s that, you don’t need to run around doing anything for it, just know that it’s there and try to work in its favour etc. That said, and I think I’ve said it before and will say it again, when the Jesus stories are done well, I can really get involved with it all. When he speaks of love here, for instance, I get it. When the people run from him to kill the people he has said are wrong and he yells after them, “Not death! I said love!” I get it. It really makes me wonder if we’re reaching a similar point now when so few people are willing to love in lieu of cynicism and suspicion. Is anyone gonna stand up at the 11th hour and risk making an ass of themselves to save us? It’s a movie I know that now it’s really in me – I almost don’t even count that first viewing as a teenager as really seeing it – is going to haunt me as long as my brain’s ticking.



The Big Lebowski

The Big Lebowski

Monday, February 25th, 2008

“The Dude abides …”

Just how cool can a movie be? The Big Lebowski after 10 years still never fails to make me laugh, nearly make me cry, and generally leave me with a warm fuzzy feeling and a resting heartbeat to slowdance to. I seem to have kept the gaps between viewings each time just about long enough that there are still surprises, scenes I adore but always forget about; it feels so fresh like only last week I was watching it for the first time, not nearly a decade.

I’m sure I must’ve written about it before in all that time, and maybe I wrote this too, but though it’s been squeezed through a hash-smoke filled funnel, the story is very “Big Sleep” and the like, the title of course reflecting that. Roger Deakins’ photography is so shiny, I don’t even know if you hear a single bowling shoe squeak on the alley floor but somehow you hear it anyway. The slo-mo, the music, the dream sequence and porno, there’s just so much here to enjoy for at least another 10 years and beyond. Absolutely one of my favourite Coen movies, and the perfect post-Oscar chillout movie, particularly of course this year.