Posts Tagged ‘documentary’

Terror in the Aisles

Terror in the Aisles

Monday, August 8th, 2011

I’ve reviewed a bunch of horror documentaries here and though I might just be leaping at the opportunity for a short review (trying to get back into writing more regularly here), this one should really be no exception as it’s among the most notorious. Coincidentally it finally hits blu-ray this Halloween as an extra on a new release of Halloween II; I only just heard about it very recently (despite its seeming notoriety lol) and was surprised I knew nothing about it.

There’s very little of social or historical commentary as you find in other horror docs here – at only 80 minutes with the list of films it shows clips from (let’s just say too many to list here; and just about any horror movie you can name that had been made before the film came out in 1984). What you get is Donald Pleasence and Nancy Allen sitting in a movie theatre talking solemnly about how horror movies (or terror movies, as they’re called here; a great move allowing the inclusion of such nightmarish movies as Marathon Man and Midnight Express) make us feel.

What strikes one most about this one is not just the array of movies included but the slickness of the whole thing. The editing is top notch – cutting together, say, door slams or something, a dozen or more at once from different movies. The whole opening sequence is a relentless montage of “alone in the house” scenes. We see this kind of thing all the time now but it’s strangely impressive to see it in a production so old.

Suddenly, after describing the movie, I realise it doesn’t sound like much, but it’s one of very few of these horror documentaries that I’ll likely watch again and again, just for the sheer assault of content it provides. It’d be something great to have on in the background on a scary movie night, or on an iPod to watch a little of on a long journey, etc when you want that atmospheric je ne sais quoi that all these movies provide but you either haven’t the time for a full movie or can’t decide what movie to watch. If you love horror, chances are you don’t need me to tell you all this; but if you love horror, really, drop everything if you haven’t seen this yet.



Cave of Forgotten Dreams

Cave of Forgotten Dreams

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

“An 8 year old boy’s footprint is found next to those of a wolf. Was the wolf stalking the boy, were they walking as friends? Or were they walking thousands of years apart? We just don’t know…”

Two years ago I went to Paris for three days and on one of those days I went first to the lowest point of the city – its catacombs – and, as the sun set, to its highest point – the top of Montparnasse tower. It was a glorious experience, and it was only as I lay in my bed at the end of the day, full of champagne, that I made the poetic (or pathetic, depending on your outlook) observation that it was as if I’d been to heaven and hell in one 24 hour period, so harsh was the contrast between the two realms.

Werner Herzog makes no apologies for seeing this kind of epic, spiritual, poetic (or pathetic, see above) drama at every turn of this new documentary that takes us to a remote network of caves in France where the oldest known paintings in the world – over 30,000 years (take that, Creationists – sorry, but I’ve been listening to Richard Dawkins this weekend, lol) old – were discovered. The caves are so delicately preserved that his time is limited – his crew is limited – the freedom of his camera is restricted – even the amount of light they are allowed to use to illuminate their subject is rationed.

The limitations show. The resolution varies vastly, and at times the 3D frankly looks worryingly, badly post-converted. I have to say, it’s almost always forgivable due to the fact that the images – for example, one of the worst-looking pieces of footage, of the “dark side” of a hanging rock pendant, where one of the earliest depictions of the human form is to be found – are either going to be seen like this or not at all. And when the 3D and resolution conspire to do their best, the effect is that of total immersion… only the smell is really missing (at one stage it’s suggested they may recreate the caves as a “theme park” in the near future, complete with a replication of the smell… maybe they can pump that smell, once created, into future screenings of the movie, or provide a small vial of essence with the blu-ray package? lol)

Towards the end, I have to say, it kind of takes on a truly peculiar trajectory, with a bizarre host of characters miles away in Germany finding not paintings but sculptures and musical instruments believed to be from the same time and place (well, they were closer to being in the same place at the time, that is…). There’s an experimental archeologist dressed as an Inuit, playing the Star-Spangled banner on a primitive flute, and a fascinating perfumer sniffing around the rocks. There’s a certain urge to laugh like a schoolboy at some of these people, contrasted as they are to Herzog’s super-reverent approach – but mostly, this urge for me was completely trumped by the infectious enthusiasm for their subject they radiate.

Herzog tags on an epilogue which is so further disconnected from the initial subject matter that it’s equally easy to dismiss, but it fits Herzog’s flighty (albehe so sinister in tone) personality. At one stage he’s interviewing a French scientist about the history of the caves, etc, and he’s talking about how overwhelmed he was on seeing the paintings. “I am a scientist, but I’m also a human,” he says, prompting Herzog to inquire about the man’s personal life. He used to work in the circus, it transpires. This leap embodies Herzog’s approach – humanising the sublime by placing it in the context of the ridiculous. His epilogue is just an idea that occurred to him that he felt might be important, and he simply leaves it with us… and it haunted me all the way home and still… Some alligators in a tropical biosphere 20 miles from the caves, heated by the cooling waters discharged from a nearby nuclear power plant. It’s all connected. We’re all connected. He imagines the alligators looking at the paintings we’ve been looking at and wondering if they have any better chance of truly understanding the human truth behind them, so distant and different were the artists. One of the scientists on the journey with him latches onto a detail of a man with a crooked finger, this detail enabling us to “follow” him through the cave where he left his unmistakable mark. But does that detail really tell us anything about him?

At only 90 minutes, it must be said that to me it felt much, much, longer. To many people, me included, it will test the patience. On the big screen, the variable quality of the footage can be trying, and there’s much repetition of some of the paintings. But I still want to say, this is the best 3D experience I have ever had. This movie (or the footage it contains) is undeniably important and, whether you like it or not while watching it, I’m convinced anyone would feel glad that they watched it. As Herzog has said in interviews, he barely considers it a movie really, and rightly so. It really is more an experience – as thorough a documentation as currently possible of what it is like to be privileged enough to enter these caves. Herzog’s narration and his interviewees touch on questions of art, history, science, time, cinema, and the nature of human existence itself. It’d be a sorry soul indeed whose mind wasn’t left buzzing by all this. I didn’t just mention my trip to the Catacombs in my opening to show off or segue into my review… what this movie left me with was a huge desire to go back there, armed with the thoughts Herzog left me. I knew what I felt when I was down in that darkness, but I couldn’t even wordlessly articulate it in my own mind to myself at the time. It was exactly what this movie is all about, and my second visit (or indeed, my first visit to any historical place from now on) will be completely touched by the beautiful mess of thoughts and feelings it delivers.



Nightmares in Red, White and Blue

Nightmares in Red, White and Blue

Monday, November 8th, 2010

This review will be even shorter than the one I wrote for Never Sleep Again lol… Basically this to me is just an extension of The American Nightmare, a horror documentary that came out a few years ago dealing with horror in the 60s and 70s, mostly relating their content to the likes of the assassination of JFK and the Vietnam war.

A sizable chunk of this repeats stuff that we’ve heard about many times before now (not just in The American Nightmare either), but I have to admit that once it hits the late 70s and less-chartered territory, it does become a lot (well, a little) more interesting. It must be said it does cover much earlier ground too – though Mark Gatiss’ recent BBC4 series blew all this out of the water. At 90 minutes with such scope you could never really come to this expecting a wealth of depth… but if you’re a horror fan, the clips and talking heads are bound to keep you well appeased.



Best Worst Movie

Best Worst Movie

Monday, November 8th, 2010

“Mostly I’ve frittered my life away… but what else is there to do with life but fritter it away?”

This is an odd one to review – as you’ll know perhaps from previous reviews, pretty much any horror documentary tends to get an automatic minimum of a 3 heart rating from me because I love the genre, and this one has been on my must-see list for some time… but it’s really something else than a horror documentary. The subject is the movie Troll 2, widely regarded as the worst movie ever made (but, y’know, in a good way); specifically the cast and crew of that movie and where they are now, 20 years later. Its closest relative lies far outside the horror genre, in the wonderful Anvil: The Story of Anvil.

For the most part, I’d say it really lives up to that comparison and I understand the high praise that led me to so badly want to see it. There’s a heartwarming sense about most of the participants that reminds one of movies like Ed Wood or Bowfinger …they were never trying to make art, really, they just figured it’d be fun to make a movie. I have to admit, I don’t go so wild for the “so bad it’s good” thing as others, so I was never really going to “get” much of the “fan” side of the documentary, but some of it is kind of glorious.

What let the movie down for me is the incredibly awkward sequences with those who actually were taking the movie seriously or those who clearly don’t really want to be associated with it. The most notable of these is the Italian director of the movie and his wife who wrote the screenplay. His wife actually makes a decent attempt to explain how this mad movie really did have a “message” of sorts but it still mostly comes across as kind of cringeworthy compared to those like the documentary maker himself who just accept that the movie was a glorious failure that became a cult classic. The director eventually justifies all this to himself but early on I felt pretty bad for him as he realised people were laughing at his movie and not with it.

Then there’s the sequence with the (like I say, otherwise good-natured) guy who leads the documentary (a cast member of Troll 2) at a UK comic convention. We see him prior to this repeating “classic” lines at other screenings and conventions, but it’s clear at the UK event that nobody has ever heard of the movie, and the guy genuinely seems embarrassed, in fact actually leaving the convention under the guise of blowing off its patrons (it’s clear who the biggest loser in the situation is, I’m afraid). On top of this is a sequence where the film makers track down another original cast member whose life now is caring for her elderly mother. The awkwardness of this scene is almost too much to bear. I haven’t even mentioned the cast member who was actually mentally ill at the time of filming, or the kindly old gentleman nobody who delivers the line quoted above.

In thinking about the movie after the credits rolled, however, I kinda began to think how even this awkwardness, the tragic element, only really adds to the humanity of the whole movie. As a true documentary, it could never really be all, “hey it was a bit of fun” like the movies I mentioned… these are real people in the end. I’m not sure I’m any more likely to watch this again than the movie it’s about… but “so human it’s awkward” is something you rarely get to say about a horror documentary, so there’s something here worth celebrating.



Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy

Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

There’s little to say about this but I feel like I should at least post something because it more than deserves mentioning. This is a 4 hour documentary about the entire Nightmare on Elm Street series, which when I first heard about it already made it a must-see – it becomes even more so when you discover there’s a further 4 hours of “extras” on the DVD set. This month I’ve been working through the many older extras, interviews, featurettes to be found on older releases of these movies (notably the Nightmare on Elm Street encyclopedia, etc) and I can tell you there are few, if any, duplications here. These are all new interviews with just about everybody involved in the original, the sequels, the spin-offs, the merchandising… literally everything seems to be covered. Even actors you mightn’t expect to appear (for example Kim Myers, of Nightmare 2, who I don’t think I’ve ever seen interviewed) have been pursuaded to join in.

Obviously this kind of thing is only for fans, and if you are such a fan then you’ve probably already run out to buy it. But I just found this to be even more astounding than it sounded when I first heard about it. It’s a hell of a way to to spend an afternoon if you love these movies. It even kinda makes you love them even more, or at least make that love seem a little less strange. Oh yes, and there’s some terrifically disturbing stop-motion interstitials too. It’s really about time someone made an all-out stop-motion horror movie… Evelyn Evelyn anyone?



Slacker Uprising

Slacker Uprising

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

It’s truly a tale of two Michael Moores to watch this so quickly in succession with Capitalism: A Love Story. To be fair, this was never offered up as a particularly polished production, offered for free unlike Capitalism, more an appendix to Fahrenheit 9/11 than a “sequel” that some might have expected.

The last thing you should want by the end of this movie is for what happened to actually happen – that is, for Bush to be elected as he was for a a second term. But there is a sickening self-satisfaction to the proceedings – the rally after rally, the sob stories and celebrities wheeled out on the many stages of Moore’s journey – that I’m sorry to say made me kind of revel in the inevitable end. The intention seems to be instead of asking “what went wrong?” (which is what we’ve all asked plenty about that election), to show how much was done right and let that speak for itself.

Normally this approach of Moore’s works for me. I take it the way he gives it when asked if his films are propaganda early on here – he answers that basically the propaganda is on the mainstream news, wall to wall wherever Americans look, and what he offers (for, he laments, a price in movie theatres – perhaps why he put this out for free in the end) is the anti-propaganda, the information that those news outlets should be giving out for free. He has to be one sided because there’s just too much other sh*t on the other side. I get that. Here, however, I’m afraid it just comes across as holier-than-thou. Stay out of your own movies, Mr. Moore.



Capitalism: A Love Story

Capitalism: A Love Story

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

“I refuse to live in a country like this: and I’m not leaving.”

Speaking of my ebbed passion for Messrs Smith and Gervais in my Cemetery Junction review, it’s odd how I came to this latest documentary by Michael Moore, who hasn’t even done anything in particular since Fahrenheit 9/11 to lose my admiration. Nevertheless, though SiCKO was a perfectly fine and often emotional indictment of the US healthcare system, I even still forget just how enthusiastic I was for Fahrenheit. It remains, even despite my not having seen it once again in the past 4 or 5 years, high up in my top 100 movies of all-time. And I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say, my emotional response to this one came pretty close to as powerful.

You wouldn’t think a movie about financial collapse could be so moving. But after a snarky opening comparing modern day America to Ancient Rome at its peak before collapse, Moore plunges us into terrifyingly personal footage of a family facing eviction. We hear of young people being put in juvenile prisons for profit. Moore unearths some incredible footage, including Jimmy Carter warning against the very financial nightmares America has recently faced, and Franklyn D. Roosevelt outlining the “Second Bill of Rights”.

On the humour side, we get a spot-on bank-talking Jesus, and home loans being offered in the Godfather’s voice. It’s on the humour side also, though, that the movie unfortunately takes its one dip, when Moore pulls his typical “stunt”, trying to physically get the banks to “give the money back” to the people which really fell flat for me personally, not even coming close to the “returning the bullets to Walmart” scene in Bowling for Columbine and instead just making me feel painfully embarrassed for Moore.

But it’s a small and inevitable blemish on what otherwise is a horrifying look at a far too accepted part of modern-life that’s second only perhaps to the marginally more terrifying The Corporation. He ends on images of hurricane Katrina and that line above and it’s impossible not to feel as bitter as he does about this state of affairs, whether you’re American or not. Like SiCKO it might not seem to be as immediately important a documentary as Fahrenheit 9/11, but I’ve a feeling it probably is.



When You’re Strange

When You’re Strange

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

I have to admit, though I have been and for the most part remain a huge Doors fan in my time, my expectations weren’t huge for this, not least because of Mark Kermode’s quite fair knocking of the whole Doors “thing” on his BBC Five Live Friday review show. I’m one who always wants to believe there was a spiritual and poetic resonance to Jim Morrison’s life even beyond what the likes of Oliver Stone’s movie portrayed, but I find it hard to defend him all that passionately when someone like Kermode points out the reasons why it was all just a joke… and Kermode did it pretty darn well in that review of this.

The movie is not helped at all by Johnny Depp’s narration. Apparently he was brought in to simply redub the narration already in place by the film’s writer-director Tom DiCillo because first audiences found DiCillo’s reading too monotonous. Considering how disinterested Depp sounds in the final version, I dread to think how the first take was.

But to be perfectly honest, this for me is where the movie’s failings end (the silly “omg Mr Mojo Risin is an anagram of Jim Morrison” moment notwithstanding). While the fact remains that there’s little of actual information here that as a Doors fan I hadn’t known before, all the anecdotes, stories, controversies and of course the music, the footage they have gathered is almost without exception extraordinary to behold and despite the presentation and packaging we should really be grateful to see it in any form.

I also read that this was meant to be an “anti-Oliver Stone” take on The Doors story, as Stone’s ’91 movie apparently offended as many fans as it created (count me in the latter set). I have no idea what’s wrong with the Stone movie and would gladly stick it together with this and maybe one of the concert DVDs to a make a full night of Doors viewing in the future. It’d be even better if they just released the footage sans-narration on a special edition Blu-ray, though. You should find this more than worth your time if you have anything more than a passing interest in music of the time.