Posts Tagged ‘comics’

The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

Saturday, November 29th, 2008

So … I’m glad I held off on the reviewing this one. I knew deep down there was a reason I was waiting, and as the opportunity to view it a second time came closer, that reason became clearer. I initially felt plainly too bogged down by the mass acceptence of the thing; like Wall-E, that, “what else is there to say?” feeling that pretty much describes my year in movie watching lol. But it’s kind of more than that. I knew the movie was as perfect as everybody was saying the moment I saw it, and that’s important as to my own opinion on the thing; don’t get me wrong, I know where the good reviews are coming from. There’s very little to complain about.

BUT.

It doesn’t stand on its own.

Christian Bale’s voice is ridiculous.

… and great as Maggie Gyllenhaal may be, it’s still a cast change that I can do without and that in contrast to the otherwise flawless continuation of Batman Begins is just plain too distracting. I am not of the ilk that believe comic books are the revolutionary future of cinema; I find the concept ridiculous, it’s an entirely different artform I just really don’t think this movie will endure even a decade. That, and I really believe that people who think comic books are the revolutionary future of cinema should be taken out and BIFFed.

Umm .. that, and despite how I will probably still shed a tear if it happens: I really think that if Heath Ledger wins for this when he didn’t win for Brokeback would be kind of an insult – because though he’s great, it would never have been one of his best remembered performances were it not for what happened. It’s a practically perfect movie, don’t get me wrong … but there are just too many niggling drawbacks for me to go with the masses on this. Batman Begins is a much more complete and assured production, and I’m pretty sure I’d say the same of at least two of the 80s/90s movies on a repeat viewing too.

At the same time of all this, of course, it’s gotta be said as I value it in considering a movie’s quality: it gets people talking. One feels the need to argue exactly why you did or didn’t like it. And to me, that in itself makes a movie better than it otherwise might be.

In the disappointing collection of releases outside of the Oscar season this year, it’s no surprise that people latch onto “The Dark Knight” … I just can’t wait for whatever finally snaps them out of it (sighWatchmen, I imagine …)

The ending, on the other hand, is fantastic.



The Incredible Hulk

The Incredible Hulk

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

giggles

Okay let’s try and get a few more stragglers out of the way before another couple of longer reviews from today.

Again, I can certainly say I liked this but little more. Unlike a lot of people, this didn’t really have the easiest ride following my recent revisit to Ang Lee’s version which I found eons better than I did the first time around. Though Edward Norton was a great starting point, this new Hulk had a lot to live up to. Fortunately, it pretty much delivers. The weighty artsiness of Ang Lee’s vision is here replaced with a Bourne -ish intelligent chase, and the angry green monster is just the kind of visual effects extravaganza you’d expect.

For me, there’s one moment in it that probably makes me biased and that’s the inclusion of the “Lonely Man” piano theme from the TV series … and I can’t deny getting some kind of inexplicable teenage boy joy from “Hulk smash!” reminiscent of my similarly bewildering reaction to Optimus Prime in last year’s Transformers … quite honestly I giggled and clapped like a toddler on that line … seriously lol.



Iron Man

Iron Man

Monday, October 6th, 2008

Blech. It’s starting to annoy me now the number of movies this year are leaving me with precious little to say. This is really Batman Begins Lite, it takes Downey Jr. forever to get into the damn suit here and it’s marginally interesting for that time; and when he finally does get in the suit, all personality and character just vanishes entirely, it’s horrific. Again, it just really did very little for me – even at my most generous I can’t for the life of me fathom the high regard this got across the board on its release. Downey Jr. for an Oscar? He doesn’t do anything! Again, I just don’t know what else to say about it … and believe me I’ve been trying for weeks only to come to the conclusion, “why should I?” lol.



Hancock

Hancock

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

I’ve heard a thing about Batman that I’d heard a lot before, but I’ve heard it a lot recently since the new movie came out, and that’s in a nutshell that “Superman is how America sees itself; Batman is how the rest of the world sees America.” Well, with Hancock perhaps we’ve found a rival superhero for the U.S. to identify with, lol. There’s a sequence here where Hancock meets the PR man played by Jason Bateman as Bateman’s car gets stuck on a trainline. The classic superhero setpiece, right? Yet just about any way Hancock can screw things up, Hancock does screw things up. We see glimpses of similar “rescues” early on the movie – H sure gets the job done, but usually at the cost of mucho avoidable carnage. It kinda reminded me of the opening of Team America. It’s very funny, but just a little frighteningly true.

I’m in severe catchup mode right now (I’ve actually had to force myself to skip a bunch of reviews including Son of Rambow, Zohan and Harold and Kumar just so I can start writing again – I’ll watch them all again and review them later in the year, I promise) so I’d heard plenty about this movie and the gist was pretty well summed up on Mark Kermode’s podcast in that apparently it’s “half a good movie” – the bad half allegedly coming when a “second superhero” shows up (avoiding spoilers).

Well, I was really enjoying the movie for a good hour or so till I began bracing myself for this revelation. What can I say but I was pleasantly surprised; and I really can’t see where the last third of this movie resembles such mindless knockabout finales as Transformers etc, the story is surprisingly bracing right to the close – I found the movie following the “revelation” closer to a good Mr. And Mrs. Smith than anything else (if that’s too much of a spoiler then I apologise – if you haven’t seen it by now then phooey :-P ).

The only thing that really would’ve made it better for me would’ve been a little more of French Daegy, lol – what you see of him in the trailer/promo clip is just about all there is, and hilarious though he is, I don’t think that quite warrants the cuties tag :-P



Speed Racer

Speed Racer

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Well this year seems only to get harder and harder for me to watch. I had semi-high hopes for this, coming as it does from the Wachowskis, being as it is not The Matrix (great movies, all: but I’m dying for a return to Bound), starring as it does Christina Ricci (with a pink helicopter to boot, lol) – and it sure looked colourful.

It starts well – I’d say my attention was full for at least 20 minutes, there’s some really good storytelling setting up the backstory; I laughed, I was gripped. It felt like maybe it was gonna come from the same school of car love as Chitty and Herbie, which bode well for my liking it. The younger brother character is surprisingly one of the better things in the movie where you’d actually imagine him to be annoying as hell – he reminded me of Tatum O’Neal in Paper Moon combined with Short Round from Temple of Doom or something.

But somewhere in the middle, I just stopped caring. Then, as time wore on, I realised what was really annoying me. It’s a Robert Rodriguez movie. We saw this – or at least, we had the opportunity to see this, 5 years ago in Spy Kids 3. The colours, the car racing, the goofy comedy, the heightened emotion, the corny values – trust me, it was all there in that movie, yet people turned a blind eye to it waiting instead till the sick Sin City to be hip in their sudden adulation for the film maker who was by then, as far as I’m concerned, already on a downward turn from which he hasn’t yet, and mayn’t yet, recover. And now a lot of people seem to be giving the same cheesy thing a free ride just because it’s the Wachowskis. I’m sorry, but this is as bad a movie as I finally realised Spy Kids 3 was (outside of Courtney Jines) – but it least Rodriguez did it first, not to mention cheaper.

Then there’s the message of the movie. It comes over all grandiose like James Earl Jones’ speeches in Field of Dreams … “It doesn’t matter if racing never changes. What matters is if we let racing change us.” Again, I’m sorry, but this came over to me a lot like, we can’t do anything to change the state of the world and the fact that it’s going to hell – all we can do is hope it doesn’t take us down with it. And if we apply it back to the Wachowskis and the filmmaking world, if this movie isn’t proof that they’ve let the shoddy changing state of cinema change them, then I dread what they’re (or rather, Joel Silver, who seems to have brainwashed them somewhere between Reloaded and Revolutions) gonna come up with next. I found it an even more depressing message to find in a movie for kids than Enchanted‘s, “don’t bother dreaming.” (Yeh, I guess that’s probably ‘just me, then?’ too.)

The problem is: sh*t is going to take you down with it if you make yourself a part of it and don’t bother to make an effort to change it. If Speed really wanted to just race for the love of racing, then why was he in the big corporate races to start with? Why, as another review I just read pointed out, does he not even looking like he’s enjoying himself anyway lol? And if the Wachowskis really wanted to follow their own lead and make movies just for the fun of it, then why wasn’t this movie made with Legos on YouTube?

It just left me sad.



Daredevil

Daredevil

Friday, April 25th, 2008

I’ve gotta stop starting reviews with “I’ve gotta admit …” lol … but I’ve gotta admit I didn’t know much about this comic book (I know even less about the forthcoming Iron Man, that should be fun …) and I was pleasantly surprised by where the story went here, regarding Elektra thinking Daredevil killed her father, etc. That said, the whole thing is smoothed over (well … resolved, cut short, however you wanna put it the conflict doesn’t last is what I’m saying lol) a little too quick for my liking – the idea of the alter-ego’s love interest being the superhero’s enemy is fascinating – of course it’s done even better in Batman Returns with Catwoman, but even then I think there’s room for expansion (btw, like I said I’m really not big on comicbooks – if I’ve just detailed an archetype that’s found in hundreds of the things then forgive me lol).

Anyway … it’s dumb but it’s slick, the cast (outside of Garner and Affleck, at least) is impressive (you’ve gotta love the Kevin Smith cameo), and best of all it’s short. The visual effects are particularly stunning, I think there are some digital actors in here that are way more convincing than those in the same year’s Matrix sequels, and I love the rain/seeing thing. It’s just about enough to forgive the corny repetition of “Stay with me …” and the even cornier use of Evanescence on the soundtrack, lol. The ending really took me by pleasant surprise too.



Mallrats

Mallrats

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

“Saaaay … would you like a chocolate covered pretzel? They’re a little melty, but boy are they exquisite.”

Another I thought I’d reviewed more recently than ’04 :) The main thing I’d forgotten about this movie is Claire Forlani and Shannon Doherty. Throw in the short Joey Lauren Adams appearance and I think you’ve got at least the sexiest Kevin Smith movie if not the funniest. I didn’t exactly bring the house down on this viewing like the one below but there are tons of moments that still make me laugh out loud more than a lot of Smith’s output, which more often than not I like more for the emotional content than the humour. This one on the contrary is pretty much all about the funny – the ending is stirring in that cheesy Eighties way that it’s going for, but it’s not the deeper territory that Smith has, I don’t care what anyone else says, touched in his other movies. I still haven’t seen Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back since the review below – I seem to be avoiding it – I really don’t think it’s as consistently on the nose as this one, though. The Jay and Bob storyline here alone is worth seeing the movie for, Kevin Smith doing the cartoon acting, playing to the camera completely, arguably better than he’s done anywhere else. It’s often spoken of as a somehow lesser work of Smith’s but I think it might just be the most essential companion to any given one of the others.

June 10th, 2004:

I must’ve been numb the last time I saw this movie which is why I’m filing this under “Virgin Viewing,” because I damn near died laughing the night I watched it this time.

I’ll probably eat these words the next time I see Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back because I’ll likely love that one on a second viewing just as much – but Mallrats is as funny as J&SB should have been.

Does it have a point, a story even? I could hardly tell you. But you have Silent Bob continuously busting in on Joey Lauren Adams trying to change, the poor fat guy trying to see the stereo image, “Oooh, a sailboat!” (“There is no Easter bunny!!”), Jay and Silent Bob beating up the Easter bunny, and plenty more.

Put it this way – if movies like The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and The Exorcist can be described as, “an assault of horrors,” then Mallrats is an assault of comedy.



Casper

Casper

Friday, March 25th, 2005

It’s really really hard for me to review my passionate favourites. I sat down to watch this today not knowing if I’d be in the mood for it, but within minutes – even before Christina Ricci appeared onscreen – I was back 10 years ago.

It’s so hard to believe how old this movie is – the effects still stand up completely. For me they’re among the very best in movie history. The ghosts aren’t marvels of 3-dimensional modelling, but on this viewing I realised for the first time what exactly is so good about the visual effects on this movie – it’s all in the lighting. In every scene, the ghosts blend in so perfectly. There’s simply no doubting that they are in the scene with the humans, they’re as much characters as anyone else. Ironically, the only time this illusion slips is when the ghosts are in a frame of their own, the editor cutting back and forth to a human jerking their head around “following” the ghosts’ motions.

My favourite thing about this movie is the score by James Horner. You can say what you like about its obviously being ripped off from Danny Elfman’s Beetlejuice and Edward Scissorhands scores (it’s almost too clear that these were probably used as a temp score at times), but somehow, for me at least, it ultimately stands as a work on its own. The piano theme alone, Casper’s Lullaby, which is one of the few parts you really can’t attribute to Elfman, is worth an Oscar. When coupled with the image of a lonely young girl passing her hand through that of a lonely ghost, it makes for me one of the most beautiful moments I’ve ever seen on film.

I’m always surprised by the sheer number of sad scenes in this movie. I always think I’m going to come to it and find Carrigan and Dibs (Eric Idle and Cathy Moriarty – I have to admit, even they are brilliant in flashes as pure comic relief, you couldn’t ask for better actors in a movie like this) all over the place. But from the image of a haunted Bill Pullmann on a tabloid news show, trying to contact his dead wife, to Ricci pulling a photo of her mother out of a box while unpacking (that piano theme making itself heard for the first time), to the aforementioned breakfast “touching” scene, to the scene that really made me break down this time – when Casper asks Kat (Ricci) “Can I keep you?” and kisses her on the cheek, and she mistakes his natural coldness as the window being open – it’s just an incredibly sad movie, right down to Casper basically losing his dream in the end. It always really kind of shocks me how deep the movie goes. I’m convinced it’ll always be close to my heart, this one.