Tag Archives: comedy

Iron Man 3 Iron Man 3 4 star

April 25th, 2013 by surlaroute

Tags: , , ,

The first words that came to mind in the deliberately disjointed first few minutes of Iron Man 3* were “fast and loose”. We see the image of a row of Iron Man suits exploding in slow motion as an almost clichéd weary narration by Robert Downey Jr. begins to tell the story before stopping and deciding to start over at a much earlier point. But “fast and loose” doesn’t really begin to describe the freedom Shane Black seems to have been given on this, quite easily the best and most fun instalment in the trilogy.

Of course I came to this movie well prepared in terms of the Avengers franchise – this week in anticipation I watched both of the first Iron Man movies and last year’s team effort again; but in terms of the tone Shane Black brings to the table, perhaps I would’ve been less surprised if I’d also seen his debut feature Kiss Kiss Bang Bang first. I finally watched it the minute I got home from Iron Man 3 and the “fast and loose” made a lot more sense – Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is just as much of a delirious overturning of genre – but it’s still a pretty big shock that Black was allowed to play so much with such a huge property here.

“When are we gonna talk about New York?”
“Maybe never?”

The movie is so much fun in the end that it’s easy to forget how brutal it is initially in setting up the stakes. There’s some real nastiness here from Ben Kingsley’s Mandarin and all he represents that is every bit as bold from a mainstream American blockbuster as all its ultimate slapdashery. Given Kingsley’s very bearded similarity to one of America’s most recent enemies and images of Tony Stark having fever dreams and anxiety attacks over his recent encounter with unprecedented attacks in New York, it’s hard not to see the clear parallel being made here. We’ve seen a lot of depictions of terrorism in movies since 9/11 but perhaps none quite so close to the bone as this. The anti-American diatribes uttered by the Mandarin are the kind that almost have you convinced he might have a point. A musing on the phoniness of the fortune cookie – an invention not Chinese but American, and therefore “hollow and full of lies” – leads into a larger more tangible statement, the bombing of something equally artificial, Grauman’s Chinese Theatre… a moment that strikes one as being as much anti-Hollywood as it is anti-American (not to mention being a particularly unsettling watch in light of even more recent events…). There are early references to America’s genocide of the Native Americans, and even a callback in the middle section of the movie where Stark, lost and suit-less in the middle of snowy Tennessee, calls home and tells Pepper Potts, “I just stole a poncho from a wooden Indian,” having done just that outside a gas station.

“The second you give evil a face, you give the people a target.”

It’s hard to talk more about Ben Kingsley’s performance other than to say it is at turns chilling and completely in keeping with the more riotous tone of the movie – to say more than that would be to ruin one of the movie’s biggest surprises. I’ve probably already said too much – but I honestly lost count of how many times I couldn’t believe what I was seeing during this movie, so it’s pretty hard to spoil completely. I expressed astonishment that a movie like The Hunger Games got made by Hollywood last year. Let’s just say, what that movie had to say about the duplicity of power was nothing compared to the even harsher indictments of the modern Western world up the Mandarin’s sleeves…

The Mandarin’s minions are pretty scary individuals too – bio-engineered into either weapons or bombs (it depends how the treatment “takes”) – the “burning embers” flesh effect here is perhaps the most disturbing thing I’ve seen in a comic book movie since Robot Vera in Superman 3. The visual effects of the various havoc they wreak are quite something to behold, and particularly visceral when contrasted with the snowy setting of the middle section of the movie.

Then there’s the “barrel of monkeys” scene. I probably would’ve seen the movie in 3D even if I didn’t want to since that was all that was on offer in the way of a midnight screening and usually I’d say I can take or leave 3D (especially when it’s post-converted as here, something I only learned shortly before seeing it), but this free-fall sequence isn’t just one of the best uses of 3D I’ve seen but also one of the most basically uplifting action scenes too.

The movie isn’t without its little wobbles. In the Tennessee midsection it strays dangerously close to MacGyver territory as Stark resorts to building an arsenal of weapons out of bits and pieces purchased at a hardware store, and the young boy who becomes a kind of sidekick is something of a worry when he first appears, but what can I say? Like everything else, Black pulls it off – some of the funniest and most cheeky lines come between Stark and the little boy, in fact.

Likewise there are more than a couple of “deaths which turn out not to be deaths” that would normally annoy the hell out of me but for some reason – perhaps because this movie just isn’t like other movies – they didn’t. Perhaps it’s that the first of those “deaths” is oddly the more moving of the two (I don’t want to spoil, but hopefully this will make sense when you see it). Incidentally this is another thing I might not have found so strange had I seen Kiss Kiss Bang Bang first – in which Black actually brings all his dead characters, plus Elvis and Lincoln (and why not?), into a final scene to make a funny point about one character surviving and happy movie endings in general.

Which brings me to Christmas. Of all the surprises Iron Man 3 has to offer, this was the one which makes it likely to be the Avengers movie I will wind up watching the most in years to come. Because Iron Man 3, it turns out, among other things, is an instant Christmas classic. An early scene has two kids approach Stark in a restaurant and ask for his autograph – one is a little blonde-haired boy in glasses to whom Stark quips, “I loved you in A Christmas Story by the way…” The movie begins with Stark buying Pepper, much to her consternation, a ridiculous oversized bunny for Christmas but ends with him offering her a much larger (literally and emotionally) gesture. There’s Christmas songs on the soundtrack. There’s snow. There’s redemption. It’s not just a movie that happens to be set at Christmas – it’s an honest to god Christmas movie. It’s bizarre they didn’t schedule it for a November/December release (though I’d neither want an unfinished movie nor to have had to wait 8 more months…) – but that’s when I’ll be watching it in the future.

Iron Man 3 winds down very much as if it means to be the closing out of a trilogy that has done as much for the comic book movie (remember just 5 years ago when an Avengers movie was like a distant dream? I was barely even interested!) as it seems to have done for its star. When Downey Jr.’s narration speaks of the Iron Man suit like a cocoon it’s hard not to feel like he’s talking about himself and his much storied past problems. Like Stark, he immersed himself in this role that seemed at first so at odds with his image, and he seems to have emerged a far better man. I was reminded of the even more troubled Mel Gibson’s narration at the end of The Beaver – “This is a picture of Walter Black, a once hopelessly depressed individual, who had to become a beaver, who had to become a phenomenon, so that ultimately this could just be a picture of Walter Black…” For all its eye candy this is a franchise that has real characters with demons working through real recognisable issues at its core, and it’d be a jaded soul indeed that didn’t recognise how wonderful this is to find in what will certainly be one of the biggest movies of the year.

* (I’m usually as picky as the BBFC at typing film titles exactly as they appear in the opening credit but “Iron Man Three” just looks strange so I’m sticking with the 3)

Heartbreaker Heartbreaker 4 star

May 17th, 2011 by surlaroute

Tags: , , ,

“Don’t be offended but you look like a bit of a…”
“…Dickhead.”
“…Exactly.”
“…I feel good with you too…”

I feel a little guilty for not watching this sooner… if you know me at all you should know by now I’m a devout Vanessa Paradis fan and will always watch anything she’s in eventually, but the marketing for this that I saw didn’t really make out her role to be much at all; made the movie out to be a romantic comedy of the likes that I frankly feared could even turn me off her; and the Facebook page was the worst offender, reaching out to Vanessa Paradis fans (who hadn’t yet “liked” the film’s page) with competitions aimed directly at (I can’t think of a better way of saying this; either you know me and it won’t matter or you don’t, in which case, trust me, I mean well) tragically girly girls… y’know, the kind that think no men are capable of liking a movie like this so don’t even give them a chance? (I point to one of the more recent posts on that page: “This movie comes out on DVD in the US, on my birthday!!! :) I have already alerted my husband…”) (ugh… and since I first drafted this review months ago, the wall is now full of promo for the William and Kate movie… who the f**k is running that sh*t?)

Then there was Mark Kermode’s review… he somehow between watching the movie and talking about it managed to turn it in his memory into a typically xenophobic “French man: romantic; Englishman: evil” tale which it simply isn’t. Andrew Lincoln is in no way made out here to be a bad guy… an infuriatingly good guy, sure, and simply not the right guy in the end. He plays Vanessa Paradis’ fiancé. Romain Duris plays a guy who splits couples up for a living. Don’t let that concept put you off though – like Léon in The Professional, this guy has rules. He only goes to work if the woman is truly unhappy. We can tell when we meet Paradis and Lincoln that she’s not necessarily unhappy, and he’s certainly not the monster we’ve seen Duris work on in the prologue (looking for cracks, at one point Duris is disguised as a homeless man, staking out the couple at a restaurant – Lincoln gets a doggie bag to take his food home in – “Aha! a Cheapskate!” Duris happily proclaims, before Lincoln brings the doggie bag out to give the homeless people…). He usually wouldn’t take this job. But it turns out he likes the girl and he needs the money.

This movie made me laugh tons more than I expected, in fact I feel pretty safe saying it’s the most unashamedly enjoyable movie of 2010. With the Vanessa and the story and the comedy, this movie was already good enough even before the Dirty Dancing stuff came in. At first it’s little nods (Vanessa’s character is a big fan of the movie, Duris tries to acquaint himself with it to win her over)… but it builds to a sequence where they really do the full “I’ve Had the Time of My Life” dance. This would’ve thrilled me any time, but I’ve been really quite particularly into that movie lately and I’m not ashamed to say that this moment I damn near wet my pants with glee. Of course, not everyone will have this response to the movie… but sometimes a movie just comes along where that kind of thing just doesn’t matter, and for me this was that movie.

Mr. & Mrs. Smith [1941] Mr. & Mrs. Smith [1941] 3 star

October 26th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: ,

Hitchcock said he did this unexpected genre piece (one of his few romantic comedies) because he admired Carole Lombard so much and she asked him. He told François Truffaut, “Since I really didn’t understand the type of people who were portrayed in the film, all I did was to photograph the scenes as written…” but you have to appreciate that for a romantic comedy it also stems from a solid concept: a couple who detest each other find out they were never actually legally married in the first place. The couple in question even have rules in their relationship, for example that neither of them will leave the room if they have a quarrel until the conflict is resolved. Sure, it’s hard to imagine how any kind of story can rise out of this, but it’s more than most rom-coms begin with…

There’s little here to recommend it but Hitchcock does what he can with the material. There’s a very fun use of sound early on which I’m always surprised isn’t done more often in movies (perhaps because it goes against how music is applied at the last minute to movies these days – the only recent examples I can think of are animated, Monster House and Bolt) – out of the blue, the husband starts whistling exactly in sync to the movie’s music score. There’s an amusing scene with a cat in a restaurant which seems like a more workshopped version of the rather darker cat/dinner scene in Rich and Strange, and that’s very much the Hitchcock that’s on display here… I find something, though perhaps not as cinematically relevant, about Hitchcock’s least “Hitchcockian” movies that seem they might somehow say the most about his concerns. It would be very interesting to one day sit down and only watch these “lesser” works of his and see what picture of him emerges. In the simplest terms what it shows is that this man who introduced some of the darkest thoughts into the 20th Century was not averse the finer, simpler pleasures in life.

This is an unbelievably light movie, really, but considering, as I said in my The Farmer’s Wife review that I don’t usually get along with this genre at all, there must be something to this one to make it perfectly watchable to me. The “jokey” hatred between the two leads here is something that, especially in my eyes, is very hard to do right (I can’t stand when people try to do it in real life… like Maria in West Side Story, I have never learned to joke that way); but there are certainly times here when Lombard and Robert Montgomery almost match the finest example of this kind of relationship: Audrey Hepburn and Albert Finney’s “Bitch.” “Bastard.” exchange in Two for the Road …and that from me is very high praise indeed.

The Lady Vanishes [1938] The Lady Vanishes [1938] 5 star

October 20th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , ,

It’s actually not that long since I last watched this (though I didn’t review it that time – the old review below is ancient, lol) but I enjoyed it so much that time that I couldn’t wait to reach it and watch it again in this Hitchcock run. Again, I don’t feel it’s right that this is lumped together in this 6-film thriller run in Hitchcock’s filmography, though in this case for a different reason. There’s a slick consistency to the flow of the story here that to me makes it as much a leap in Hitchcock’s development as The Lodger, Blackmail, or the first in this so-called cycle, The Man Who Knew Too Much. Much of this is due to the perfect framing device of the central train journey, which quite literally gives the movie momentum even in the few instances where it’s otherwise lacking. The story hangs on it, never letting up for a moment from start to finish.

The story will be familiar even to some of those who have never seen it (or indeed, any of the remakes) because it’s been redone many times in different modes of transit (Flightplan, for example) or just in parody (no examples occur to me right now, but I’m sure they exist). A young woman meets a sweet old lady while waiting for a train, but once on board the train… well, the lady vanishes. The young woman determines to find the old lady while the rest of the passengers on board deny she ever existed.

One of the many things I love most about The Lady Vanishes is that it is simply so British. This is not limited to the obvious Charters and Caldicott, the cricketing fanatics who provide much of the comic relief in the movie (though one can’t really call it comic relief – comedy is woven throughout the dialogue of all characters)… There’s a wonderful moment when one character enquires of another what the time is and, after looking at their watch, comes to the conclusion that it’s “tea time!” Most brutal of all is the man who’s so sure no one will shoot upon the British that he walks directly into gunfire in the film’s climactic scene.

But even in this dimwitted character there’s the same endearing trait that unites all the passengers on this trip – enthusiasm. Take the doctor, who says of his patient who seems woefully sick but whose “complications” he describes as “fascinating!” And dear old Mrs. Froy herself who, in a hail of bullets quietly carries on her secret mission, calmly explaining to the girl, “Well, I must be getting along now…” (this line got the biggest laugh from me this time round, incidentally, it’s just so random in context…)

The Lady Vanishes also includes one of my favourite things in any film, and that’s that the main character hits her head within the first 30 minutes, right as she steps on the train. Even this moment doesn’t escape the infectious humour, when the girl later explains the incident to her leading man, “Something fell on my head,” he immediately asks, “When, infancy?” But I love moments like this in films like this – what it does (and it’s reinforced by disorienting camera effects) is place the audience entirely in the heroine’s head so we find ourself completely participating in her own doubts that follow – was there a Mrs. Froy? Was it all in her mind? Is this whole train journey only in her mind?

The answer of course is that none of this matters… it is all just a wonderful, hilarious, British mystery that ends with a quaint old lady holding out her arms for an embrace. I adore this movie, it’s the best of Hitchcock’s British output by far, a movie so great that even its obviously phony opening model shot signifies 90 minutes in the company of a storytelling genius.

17th June, 2004:

This is one of my favourite Hitchcock movies. It’s so simple, so British (those two proper gentlemen whose only interest is the cricket score – so British they express genuine surprise when a foreign lady “doesn’t understand” a simple sentence), but also quite terrifying in places. It has a lovely memorable theme tune that turns out to be a huge part of the story, and some fantastic comedy moments.

People talk about “old-fashioned” movies and innocence and “They don’t make ‘em like they used to,” and this movie is a true example of what they’re talking about. From the man who ended up most famous for a horrific shower scene, a sweet old lady on a train with a tune.

The Farmer’s Wife The Farmer’s Wife 4 star

September 24th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , ,

It took me a while after the last in my “Hitchcock marathon”, Downhill to get up the energy, as it were, to watch this one. There hasn’t been a truly disappointing movie yet in my first experiences of Hitchcock’s early work, but being an avid multi-tasker, I do tend to find feature length silents fairly exhausting even at their best. Yet – as seems to be an emerging theme in my movie watching – now that I’ve seen it, I really wonder why I put it off so long.

To read a summary of this movie, it really doesn’t sound like much, and certainly not the kind of thing you’d expect from the man who came to be known as the Master of Suspense, etc. A widowed farmer seeks to marry again without much success with a series of local spinsters, not realising until he’s learned through rejection that the answer was right on his doorstep all along.

It has a slow build to the comic series of meetings with the prospective new wives, where the admirably limited dialogue (it was apparently a very wordy play) struck me as embarrassingly patronising of country life, and it takes as long to adjust to its highly inappropriate and dated attitudes about the place of men and women. Once the farmer sets out on his blundering, overconfident mission to wed, however, I don’t think a feature length silent movie has ever made me laugh so much in my life.

This isn’t just the funniest silent movie I’ve seen however, nor even the funniest Hitchcock (I remember really laughing through The Trouble With Harry, but it’s been a while, we’ll see if it works so well on me when I get to it on this marathon)… it’s genuinely one of the best romantic comedies I’ve seen, and it’s not a genre I get along with well. For while the middle section is pure hilarity, Hitchcock always comes back to the soulful Lillian Hall-Davis as the farmer’s maid at home, who we slowly come to know might be exactly the lady the farmer is looking for. There’s one scene in particular where she’s alone at the fireplace and begins almost caressing an empty chair, the same chair that plays a part at various points as a symbol of the farmer’s need for company, and it really broke my heart.

There are two things you could call “wrong” with the movie, I guess, and one’s far larger than the other. It’s a very long movie like many of Hitchcock’s early work. I’ve read of a version that runs over 2 hours, but learned that this version may simply be the version I saw today (around 95 minutes) played at the wrong speed. Well, even in a form closer to 90 minutes, it does feel long and could probably benefit from a few heavy cuts.

The other thing, I almost don’t want to mention because really I feel Hitchcock kept the balance better than most movies of the time (certainly mostly thanks to his real life leading lady Alma Reville). Like I said, the gender politics of the movie are highly questionable to anyone watching the movie today. The farmer’s approach to his prospective new partners, though completely hilarious, is just as inappropriate. He tells one of them, “I’ve come here, like those foxes you’re so fond of… to catch myself a fat hen!” Another he asserts dresses her “mutton lamb fashion”, laughing at the idea she should call herself a “girl”.

But it can’t be said that the ladies in question don’t get to fight back, and they do, laughing at his efforts, relishing in their refusal, and one even laughing right in his face, “Marry you? At your age?!” And it’s a credit to Jameson Thomas’ performance that in the final scenes he genuinely convinces that he’s learned the error of his ways and is more than deserving of young Minta. This is a genuinely sweet and well-meaning movie with some of the funniest silent comedy I’ve ever seen. That it comes from Hitchcock makes it all the more surprising, and I recommend it even to those slightly averse to a silent feature.

Batman: The Movie [1966] Batman: The Movie [1966] 3 star

September 5th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

I watched this as part of a weeklong HD re-watching of all the more recent Batman movies, from Burton to Nolan (no new reviews of those, alas, I have too many others to catch up on: I’ll do it again maybe when I get the blu-rays, maybe before the next one hits cinemas). I was kind of excited to see this old one, having watched the TV series quite a bit as a teenager, and having kind of missed a little (just a little, mind) of Joel Schumacher’s inclination to the old school camp in Nolan’s darker masterpieces.

The fun gets started early here, right in the credits, in a note from “The Producers” flatly stating where the movie is coming from, which pretty much anticipates the bulk of any criticism the movie will ever get, as follows:

“We wish to express our gratitude to the enemies of crime and crusaders against crime throughout the world for their inspirational example. To them, and to lovers of adventure, lovers of pure escapism, lovers of unadulterated entertainment, lovers of the ridiculous and the bizarre — to funlovers everywhere — this picture is respectfully dedicated. If we have overlooked any sizable groups of lovers, we apologize.”

Thereafter we are plunged quickly into the end of a typical Batman and Robin scenario, a structural technique we’d become used to in the likes of the Bond and Indiana Jones movies, which here involves Batman literally punching a shark (which is clearly made of rubber) in the face. If you’re still hoping to take the movie seriously at this point, then it’s really not the movie’s fault lol. If you’re still having issues later when exchanges like “Holy hallucination!” “I wish it were, but it’s not! It’s 3 dehydrated pirates… rehydrated!” are being thrown around, then you should probably stick to picture books.

I’ll be honest. This isn’t as much of a riot as I’d hoped for. It’s been over a decade since I saw the TV series with Adam West and Burt Ward, but I have vague memories of scenarios even wilder than this movie has. I remember the crazy fight scenes (all the Biff! Baff! titles etc) bizarrely turning into dance sequences in some episodes, for example, and there’s none of that here (do comment if I have merely dreamt this lol). Lee Merriweather’s Catwoman has nothing on the Eartha Kitt or Julie Newmar version I remember, too. But it’s still seriously worth checking out for a wildly different approach to Batman than we’re used to today. I’d love to write more on this but it’s better perhaps to simply link to this page which says all I want to say and more on the subject. The new movies are near perfection as cinema, it’s true, but this one has a place that urgently needs defending.

Penn and Teller Get Killed Penn and Teller Get Killed 4 star

August 9th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , , ,

I guess I was on a roll with “movies I’d intended to watch for ages” by the time I got to this one, lol. I was kinda crazy for Penn and Teller when I was a teenager and they were first becoming popular on UK television. I even bought their book, I seem to recall, but then they seemed to vanish for years until their recent newfound popularity with the “Bullsh*t” series and now back to doing stage magic around the world.

The reviews I’d read for this were overall so-so, even those coming from apparent fellow fans of the duo, and despite there being a decent director at the helm (Arthur Penn, of Alice’s Restaurant, Bonnie and Clyde, and The Miracle Worker, albethey years before this) I guess this is why I’d passed on it for so long (in addition to its being widely unavailable outside of pricey imports).

So to the movie, and I have to start with the brilliant tagline (as seen on this poster)… “What more do you want?” with which I couldn’t agree more. This movie within minutes took me back to my excitement as a teenager whenever these guys were on TV. It opens with them on a late night talk show doing their “upside down” gravity-defying table trick, after which Penn idly comments to the host that he wishes someone were trying to kill him. In the scenes that follow it is entertainingly set up that Penn and Teller are fond of pranking one another (and not just small pranks either; early in the game Teller sets Penn up at airport security getting through the metal scanner). The stakes get higher as the movie progresses, the pranks escalating to the point where the line between fake and real begins to blur, and, without trying to spoil anything too much, let’s just say this movie really does deliver what it promises, lol.

The final scenes had me laughing so much, actually out of shock I think more than anything, that I really couldn’t believe my eyes when I read so many disappointed opinions on the IMDb message board and comments. As the tagline suggests, I really don’t know what more anybody could expect from a Penn and Teller movie. It’s brisk at 90 minutes, it has a few magic tricks, a lot of fake blood, a healthy lesson in skepticism, and finally an all-out f**k you in its finale. It really is worth checking out.

Cop Out Cop Out 3 star

August 5th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , ,

“Paul, did you just punch a little child?”
“There’s things you don’t know about me, Jim, I’ll fuck a little kid up if he kick me in the dick!”

I seem to be a strange Kevin Smith fan, though perhaps in fact that’s the norm. Like the bulk of his fans, I love his most early and iconic work, the Jersey trilogy of Clerks., Mallrats, Chasing Amy and from there the other of his works set in the “View Askewniverse” – Dogma, to a lesser extent Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back (meh, it’s fun), and most recently the surprisingly brilliant Clerks II. And I’m among the very few who actually think Jersey Girl was one of his best – a genuinely moving homage to John Hughes with some of the best performances he’s had in any of his films.

Where I get strange is: I really felt like he dropped the ball when it came to Zack & Miri Make a Porno …stepping on the heels of the Apatows that came before and producing something that, while it had its moments, felt distinctly un-Smith-like. At the same time, however, I’ve found myself enjoying the heck out of the even more culturally insignificant SModcast that he produces… and even all the spin-offs thereof (Tell ‘Em Steve-Dave, Mo & Glo, and Highlands: A Peephole History).

That long intro isn’t just to pad this review. It’s kind of there to clarify just how odd it was, then, that when I heard about Cop Out – the first movie Smith has directed that he didn’t write – my expectations weren’t entirely shot to pieces. At the risk of sounding like the kind of fanboy I really dislike… the more you appreciate Smith’s recent attitude and philosophy toward life that comes over in its purest form in his podcasts and tweets, the less inclined you’ll be to pick this movie apart for the relative waste of time it really is.

For me, it’s far from the great nod to old 80s actioners that I hoped for (the great Harold Faltermeyer of Top Gun and Beverley Hills Cop even does the score), but it still made me laugh a heck of a lot (Scott taunting Morgan in the car, Essman abbreviating her language in front of her son while waving a gun around, then cussing the heck out of the following scene; the aforementioned son’s altercation with Morgan that ends in the line I quoted above…), even when I watched it a second time to refresh my memory before writing this.

I’m told the Blu-ray’s “Maximum Comedy Mode” makes the movie an even more enjoyable experience, and I’ll be very tempted to get the disc just for that. I loved seeing Michelle Trachtenberg as Willis’ daughter and Jason Lee as the stepfather rivalling for her admiration, and there are nice little casting surprises elsewhere in the movie like Kevin Pollak, Seann William Scott and Curb Your Enthusiasm’s Susie Essman (being, as there, wonderfully shouty).

This is by no means to say the movie’s great. Kevin Smith is capable of far more than this and while it can be argued that maybe he’s simply peaked and has the right to enjoy making a simple movie like this, I simply don’t believe it. I hope either Red State or Hit Somebody (which he says will be his “greatest movie” and possibly last) outdo everything we’ve seen from him so far. But I can’t be too down on him… SModcast alone has given me hours of laughs over the last year or two, and in those Askewniverse films I genuinely believe he has probably already done quite enough.