Posts Tagged ‘cheese’

Endless Love

Endless Love

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

I feel like I’m going backwards LOL. The tagline for this movie was “She is 15. He is 17. The love every parent fears.” Like, huh? Luckily this is just another marketing faux-pas, however. While daddy here is dead set against the teenage lovers, mom is creeping down the stairs and watching them make love by the fireside in lieu of any real action for herself upstairs.

This is a movie with too many things wrong with it to mention, but as often as it almost made me cringe (and to be honest, it never tipped me 100% over, except perhaps the father’s profoundly unbelievable demise), I found it turning around and catching me out. As you may have guessed, this is the movie that introduced the Lionel Richie / Diana Ross hit to the world, and the score plays off it amply – to my surprise, it turned out to be the most I’ve got out of the song despite having heard it just as many times as everyone else on the planet. Brooke Shields is of course phenomenal to look at, and she has some impressive bits of acting too. The script is melodrama city but with Franco Zefferelli behind the camera this is an incredibly well made movie that makes the best of what story it has. It hits its most intense spot just a scene before the end and I can’t deny the rush of emotion it gave me. Shields and Martin Hewitt are on fire in this penultimate scene – it’s almost laughably intense but it worked for me completely, being one who never quite believes love of such magnitude unless it comes with equal pain attached. Seriously, in short, I don’t know why but this movie ultimately worked for me.



Circle of Two

Circle of Two

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

… ‘cos I may as well run with a theme. I held off watching this one last year when I was having quite the Tatum O’Neal feast while reading her autobiography because she hasn’t made a whole lot of movies and I felt like I had to save something. Though this movie sounded tacky as anything and the cheesily soft romantic opening credits did nothing to change the expectation, you kinda can’t go wrong by me if you put her and Richard Burton on screen for 90 minutes.

At least, that’s what I thought. Though initially this partnership works as expected – their first conversation in the restaurant, for instance – sadly, as this particular 90 minutes goes on, it gets more and more tiresome and unconvincing. It’s like the film makers started with a perfect pairing but are dead set on finding the sourness that just isn’t there in the actors’ chemistry. There’s a double climax sequence where first Tatum strips for Burton, and he tells her to “Get Dressed!” several times, unfortunately with a more age-appropriate suitor of hers (played by Michael Wincott of all people) peeking through the door; she flees and encounters him in a corn field of all places … “You’ll undress for anyone but me!” he declares, and then proceeds to try and rape her. It really shouldn’t be funny, but it’s such a laughable progression of incidence that it’s hard to stifle a titter. The rest of the movie flows predictably moralising the whys of why relationships like this could nevah!, evah! work.



Troll

Troll

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

I’ve had this waiting to be seen for a while now in my collection but it took a double bill with the sequel tonight on Zone Horror to finally get me watch it. I saw a little bit of it the other night that kinda piqued my interest. I’ll be honest, this gains immediate sway with me for the fact that the titular Troll’s first vessel of choice is a little blonde girl, lol. I mean who wouldn’t be that first if they could take other forms? (hehe … just me, then.)

Anyhoo … I write this in retrospect having now seen the sequel. This is notable because that movie a) slightly warped my brain to the point I can barely remember this one and b) quite simply, makes this one look like a masterpiece. But, trying my best to still be objective, I think I still found it perfectly watchable. The visuals, the make-up and effects etc, are indeed pretty rotten but they have clear ambition and are occasionally just a little creepy. And, really, as I began, any movie where a little girl goes apesh*t (trollsh*t?) in what should be a quaint familial setting is at least worth having a little drinkie to. All that said, aside from the kitsch value it will surely lack, the apparently forthcoming Ali Lohan remake can only be an improvement.



Bad Girls [1994]

Bad Girls [1994]

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

I could so easily convince myself that I loved this movie for the same reasons I looked forward to seeing it (lol, though obviously not that much, I’ve been “meaning to see it” for at least 5 years …) – Drew Barrymore, of course, and Jerry Goldsmith’s score. I defy anyone not to find themselves with a huge smile on their face as the end credits roll, the girls in silhouette “getting away with it” to Goldsmith’s full-on version of the glorious main theme (one of those precious few that never diminishes no matter how often it’s repeated). But overall, the fact is it’s pretty bad with only a few admittedly well-placed set-pieces to hold the attention, by no means succeeding as the semi-feminist tract I think someone involved might’ve wanted it to be. It could one day find its way into my cheesy faves collection, but for now I really can’t give it more than 3 stars.



Bratz

Bratz

Thursday, October 18th, 2007

“These are the jokes, people!”

Oh the warning bells. 2.35:1? Comic sans opening credits? Yes – Comic sans opening credits ROFL! No wait. I’m gonna say it again. Comic Sans opening credits. LOL!

I wanted this to be, like, the new Josie and the Pussycats or something. I’ve said it before, that I have no problem whatsoever with the Bratz brand – I love all those products and if I had the money I’d probably have a room full of them. There are far worse things going on in children’s lives and it angers me when people waste time whining about a toy as though each doll not only contains a mine of crack in its big bubble head but also somehow doubles as some kind of infant dildo. For the first time in this review: they’re not that bad.

At the same time, however, I also think it could’ve been incredible for them to use this movie to make a really scathing statement about the materialism, the beauty worship, y’know, stuff like that. That combined with Paula Abdul doing all the stuff she was originally meant to be doing on the movie could’ve resulted in a new masterpiece of bubblegum.

All that said, I also kind of dreaded it being such a wonderful thing – I love being honest, but I really didn’t want to be the person who followed a one-star review of one of the biggest, most popular movies of the year with a five star review of, erm, *Bratz*, lol. So I guess this movie made me happy by being … not quite that good? But, erm … I have to be honest, and it reached a point where I just started laughing and smiling and couldn’t stop … and I actually quite liked it. In fact the only part I’d agree is close to worthy of the IMDb bottom 100 is the point when they realise, “ooh, Bratz! good name” lol. But by then I was pretty much ready to forgive anything (even, incidentally, that the end credits are also in Comic Sans lol, and actually contain the words “Apple Computers” in that font :o ).

Ultimately, it is basically the High School Musical movies (particularly number 2) without the diagetic songs (till the end, I guess, but even then they’re just concert numbers and music videos). As such, I really don’t think it’s deserving of the hate that’s been levelled at it, in same way I think the hate for the dolls is a little overcooked. There’s nary a nod to the existence of sex (though there’s one line that really jars when a jock suggests “We could do a lab experiment – without the bunsen burner, y’know what I’m saying?”) and the meanest putdown is “Delete my number from your cellphone!” (that’s the moment you can actually pinpoint where the movie becomes so bad it’s good, lol – my face creased up so bad I worried it might stay that way, lol).

It doesn’t surprise me that very young kids love it. The tiny sister of the “mean” girl is like their representative in this world and she comes out of the movie looking like she controls everything. In particular for non-American kids, I think it has that “ohmygosh, American highschool is so cool” thing about it that I remember being so taken with by shows like “Saved by the Bell” back in the yonder. It’s also very colourful – blindingly so, with barely a second passing without a cut or something new and shiny entering the frame. There’s even a food fight. It really does check all the boxes, I think. It’s certainly hard to get bored here, though you might get slightly annoyed.

For the second time … it’s really not so bad – I found it far less offensive than certain other recent movies and there’s definitely a tweenage girl in me somewhere that was really fooled by the colour and the pretty people etc – and I didn’t spend the whole movie thinking, “umm – these aren’t Bratz,” like I thought I would, lol. In actual fact, I’m kind of surprised it isn’t already a cult movie to some degree. I don’t know, maybe it is.

I say, definitely double bill with Josie and the Pussycats. Add Sleepover for good measure. As a teen movie it doesn’t touch Heathers and Mean Girls and the John Hughes classics – but I’ve gotta say, this is one of those cases where I just feel I have to say, for the third time: it’s not that bad. There’s none of the scathing satire that could’ve been – but there is some semblance of a message that will be good for kids and even teens to hear. I have to say, though, 2.35:1 was kinda asking for dissent in the viewership, lol.

Hey, nominate it for Razzies at my pleasure – it certainly deserves to win something lol. I’d personally put it up for costume and Jon Voight (who is as surprising as I found Michael Ironside last night in Guncrazy) in the real awards, though.

Altogether … B.F.F!

(btw, yes, I’ve still rated it higher than that other movie … I promise, it’s a low 3 …)