Tag Archives: action

Iron Man 3 Iron Man 3 4 star

April 25th, 2013 by surlaroute

Tags: , , ,

The first words that came to mind in the deliberately disjointed first few minutes of Iron Man 3* were “fast and loose”. We see the image of a row of Iron Man suits exploding in slow motion as an almost clichéd weary narration by Robert Downey Jr. begins to tell the story before stopping and deciding to start over at a much earlier point. But “fast and loose” doesn’t really begin to describe the freedom Shane Black seems to have been given on this, quite easily the best and most fun instalment in the trilogy.

Of course I came to this movie well prepared in terms of the Avengers franchise – this week in anticipation I watched both of the first Iron Man movies and last year’s team effort again; but in terms of the tone Shane Black brings to the table, perhaps I would’ve been less surprised if I’d also seen his debut feature Kiss Kiss Bang Bang first. I finally watched it the minute I got home from Iron Man 3 and the “fast and loose” made a lot more sense – Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is just as much of a delirious overturning of genre – but it’s still a pretty big shock that Black was allowed to play so much with such a huge property here.

“When are we gonna talk about New York?”
“Maybe never?”

The movie is so much fun in the end that it’s easy to forget how brutal it is initially in setting up the stakes. There’s some real nastiness here from Ben Kingsley’s Mandarin and all he represents that is every bit as bold from a mainstream American blockbuster as all its ultimate slapdashery. Given Kingsley’s very bearded similarity to one of America’s most recent enemies and images of Tony Stark having fever dreams and anxiety attacks over his recent encounter with unprecedented attacks in New York, it’s hard not to see the clear parallel being made here. We’ve seen a lot of depictions of terrorism in movies since 9/11 but perhaps none quite so close to the bone as this. The anti-American diatribes uttered by the Mandarin are the kind that almost have you convinced he might have a point. A musing on the phoniness of the fortune cookie – an invention not Chinese but American, and therefore “hollow and full of lies” – leads into a larger more tangible statement, the bombing of something equally artificial, Grauman’s Chinese Theatre… a moment that strikes one as being as much anti-Hollywood as it is anti-American (not to mention being a particularly unsettling watch in light of even more recent events…). There are early references to America’s genocide of the Native Americans, and even a callback in the middle section of the movie where Stark, lost and suit-less in the middle of snowy Tennessee, calls home and tells Pepper Potts, “I just stole a poncho from a wooden Indian,” having done just that outside a gas station.

“The second you give evil a face, you give the people a target.”

It’s hard to talk more about Ben Kingsley’s performance other than to say it is at turns chilling and completely in keeping with the more riotous tone of the movie – to say more than that would be to ruin one of the movie’s biggest surprises. I’ve probably already said too much – but I honestly lost count of how many times I couldn’t believe what I was seeing during this movie, so it’s pretty hard to spoil completely. I expressed astonishment that a movie like The Hunger Games got made by Hollywood last year. Let’s just say, what that movie had to say about the duplicity of power was nothing compared to the even harsher indictments of the modern Western world up the Mandarin’s sleeves…

The Mandarin’s minions are pretty scary individuals too – bio-engineered into either weapons or bombs (it depends how the treatment “takes”) – the “burning embers” flesh effect here is perhaps the most disturbing thing I’ve seen in a comic book movie since Robot Vera in Superman 3. The visual effects of the various havoc they wreak are quite something to behold, and particularly visceral when contrasted with the snowy setting of the middle section of the movie.

Then there’s the “barrel of monkeys” scene. I probably would’ve seen the movie in 3D even if I didn’t want to since that was all that was on offer in the way of a midnight screening and usually I’d say I can take or leave 3D (especially when it’s post-converted as here, something I only learned shortly before seeing it), but this free-fall sequence isn’t just one of the best uses of 3D I’ve seen but also one of the most basically uplifting action scenes too.

The movie isn’t without its little wobbles. In the Tennessee midsection it strays dangerously close to MacGyver territory as Stark resorts to building an arsenal of weapons out of bits and pieces purchased at a hardware store, and the young boy who becomes a kind of sidekick is something of a worry when he first appears, but what can I say? Like everything else, Black pulls it off – some of the funniest and most cheeky lines come between Stark and the little boy, in fact.

Likewise there are more than a couple of “deaths which turn out not to be deaths” that would normally annoy the hell out of me but for some reason – perhaps because this movie just isn’t like other movies – they didn’t. Perhaps it’s that the first of those “deaths” is oddly the more moving of the two (I don’t want to spoil, but hopefully this will make sense when you see it). Incidentally this is another thing I might not have found so strange had I seen Kiss Kiss Bang Bang first – in which Black actually brings all his dead characters, plus Elvis and Lincoln (and why not?), into a final scene to make a funny point about one character surviving and happy movie endings in general.

Which brings me to Christmas. Of all the surprises Iron Man 3 has to offer, this was the one which makes it likely to be the Avengers movie I will wind up watching the most in years to come. Because Iron Man 3, it turns out, among other things, is an instant Christmas classic. An early scene has two kids approach Stark in a restaurant and ask for his autograph – one is a little blonde-haired boy in glasses to whom Stark quips, “I loved you in A Christmas Story by the way…” The movie begins with Stark buying Pepper, much to her consternation, a ridiculous oversized bunny for Christmas but ends with him offering her a much larger (literally and emotionally) gesture. There’s Christmas songs on the soundtrack. There’s snow. There’s redemption. It’s not just a movie that happens to be set at Christmas – it’s an honest to god Christmas movie. It’s bizarre they didn’t schedule it for a November/December release (though I’d neither want an unfinished movie nor to have had to wait 8 more months…) – but that’s when I’ll be watching it in the future.

Iron Man 3 winds down very much as if it means to be the closing out of a trilogy that has done as much for the comic book movie (remember just 5 years ago when an Avengers movie was like a distant dream? I was barely even interested!) as it seems to have done for its star. When Downey Jr.’s narration speaks of the Iron Man suit like a cocoon it’s hard not to feel like he’s talking about himself and his much storied past problems. Like Stark, he immersed himself in this role that seemed at first so at odds with his image, and he seems to have emerged a far better man. I was reminded of the even more troubled Mel Gibson’s narration at the end of The Beaver – “This is a picture of Walter Black, a once hopelessly depressed individual, who had to become a beaver, who had to become a phenomenon, so that ultimately this could just be a picture of Walter Black…” For all its eye candy this is a franchise that has real characters with demons working through real recognisable issues at its core, and it’d be a jaded soul indeed that didn’t recognise how wonderful this is to find in what will certainly be one of the biggest movies of the year.

* (I’m usually as picky as the BBFC at typing film titles exactly as they appear in the opening credit but “Iron Man Three” just looks strange so I’m sticking with the 3)

The Last Stand The Last Stand 4 star

January 22nd, 2013 by surlaroute

Tags: , ,

“I’ll tell you a secret… I’m probably more afraid than you are right now.”
“How so?”
“Because I’ve seen enough blood and death… I know what’s coming.”

Here’s another example of a movie I really wouldn’t have seen so soon were it not for stumbling across a free ticket to a preview screening (see Now is Good – I’ve got Flight next week too, though I’ve already seen that one it’ll give me a chance to review it better – thanks Sky and Vue). I did find myself slightly excited to see it as the time approached, though – kind of in the same “oh I was a little boy once…” way I got weirdly excited at the end of the first Transformers movie when Optimus Prime appeared. Even if they haven’t had a great effect on me as a person, I’ve grown up with Arnold Schwarzenegger movies and enjoyed a lot of them (though as with The Lord of the Rings series in my Hobbit review, I can only think of one that I truly loveT2, honorary mention to True Lies). The chance to see if he could either do all that again at retirement age or even deliver something more reflective and artful like Stallone did in Rocky Balboa was as irresistible as it was daunting.

In almost every possible department – I didn’t know much about the movie before seeing it, but half-expected violence, fun, and a little gung-ho spirit in the best 80s action tradition – The Last Stand exceeded my expectations. A simple story has Schwarzenegger in a classic Arnie role as a Sheriff of a small town, the kind of small town where someone calls him at 4:30am because their milk hasn’t been delivered and where the prisoner in the holding cell at the police station is on hugging terms with a junior officer. He’s there because as he confides in the lines I opened with, he’s “seen enough blood and death…” Elsewhere in the country a dangerous drug lord escapes while being transferred between facilities. He’s headed for the border, intends to cross at that small town, and has bountiful resources and connections along the route to ensure that even the SWAT team sent by the FBI doesn’t get there in time leaving, you guessed it, the small-town police to defend their little town alone.

If you want to find things wrong with this film, of course you will. I’ve certainly called bad films on their badness before but this one doesn’t pretend to be anything more than it is and it simply won’t be to some people’s taste. I’ve seen the whole “how appropriate is this in the recent climate about violence in movies” thing angled at this movie too and I’d frankly prefer more people took Quentin Tarantino’s line on this and simply refuse to engage in such “debate” – “It’s a MOVIE.” Incidentally, it should be noted somewhere alongside these arguments how impressive it is after all the gunfire that the actual “Last Stand” of the title here comes down to fists and knives between two people – there’s not a shot fired in the last 5-10 minutes of this movie; and before that, the violence really hurts and has consequences – in one instance, a fairly surprising one considering how early it comes.

Perhaps because of that recent unease about violence – especially gun violence – although I’ve heard of much more enthusiastic screenings, the one I was in seemed initially like me to have no clue what kind of a movie The Last Stand was going to be or how to respond. It’s in the last act however, that one particular moment truly broke the tension and I’m not exaggerating when I say there are some laughs in the last half hour of this as huge as Hot Fuzz which I suppose it semi-resembles (at least as close as an Americanised version could get). Add in a scattering of curt lines that only sound good coming out of Arnie (“How are you Sheriff?” “Old.” “Welcome to Somerton!” “Consider yourself deputised.”) and a small dose of quite (again) surprisingly genuine emotion and I guess what I’m saying is, if I enjoyed this as much as I did, then even the most half-hearted of 80s action fans will too, and that’s clearly who it’s for.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey 3 star

January 22nd, 2013 by surlaroute

Tags: , , , ,

Like so many others, I had massive reservations about this movie that only increased as it came closer to production and its now first of a trilogy yet still three hour long release. I guess I should say, I’m not the biggest fan of The Lord of the Rings – I’ve still never got around to reading the books (well maybe half of “Fellowship” when I was 14?), and I wasn’t bowled over by the Fellowship and Return of the King movies. But the one part of that trilogy that I do love – The Two Towers – I seriously, seriously, love that movie.

There was a point in the weeks running up to the release when my local multiplex listed showtimes and it became apparent they would be showing it in the new HFR format – finally, I thought, a reason to see it, which only made me realise just how little I wanted to see it. I didn’t ultimately see it in HFR – I figure if the format is a success there’ll be another chance to sample it for the first time with something more exciting.

If you haven’t sensed that I’m padding a lot here, well, clearly I am… I want to write a lot more here this year than I did last year (actually, I’ve already done that when I post this) and if it means typing up whatever comes to mind on a movie about which I have little to say, so be it. The big question here for me in the end was: did I get anything out of The Hobbit that I wouldn’t have got out of watching The Two Towers on blu-ray again? And the resounding answer is no. Did I get a huge warm fuzzy feeling every time the old Howard Shore themes kicked in, and when Bilbo finally gets accepted by Thorin? Yes. I totally did, and it didn’t feel anywhere near three hours long for me either.

The A-Team [2010] The A-Team [2010]1 star

September 27th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , ,

Oh dear, I have no notes to go by and it’s a while since I watched this, and there’s no way I’m watching it again lol. I think I might’ve been pretty excited when I first heard this was being made… but how long ago was that? Then suddenly it was upon us. It was one of my parents who told me, after the movie had been out for weeks in the states, that Liam Neeson was Hannibal, and I honestly didn’t believe them. And yet there, in various places, were people saying Neeson was one of the best things in it.

I think Neeson is all I have to talk about with this movie. You know, I would probably want to sit here and say how “nobody could fill George Peppard’s shoes” no matter who they cast, but seriously, Liam Neeson? He literally, once again, just plays himself here: only here, that’s not a good thing. I honestly feel like I’m taking crazy pills if anybody thinks Liam Neeson is even half-good as Hannibal here, and that’s just scratching the surface of the pointlessness on display.

This is the kind of movie that’s critic proof because everyone who loves it will simply shoot you down with “it’s The A-Team, it’s SUPPOSED to be dumb, stoopid!” … well, fair enough. I would point to it’s most pathetic thread – the removal of B.A.‘s mohawk. When this first occurred, I mistakenly took issue, thinking it was the remake police ironing out one of the TV show’s most iconic features (they’d already blown up the freakin’ van, for heck’s sake) for the sake of better publicity pictures of one of its actors or something. Instead, this turns out to be a “clever” message about violence, a setting up of a new reason why this B.A. 2.0 even has a mohawk. I would ask, if this movie is supposed to be as dumb as it is elsewhere in its overlong running time, why it’s wasting time making such hokey statements?

I wouldn’t say the script is a mess so much as it’s just equally tedious. The bulk of this movie is literally just the opening credits monologue of the TV series (just to rub it in, before the end credits role, we get that “if you have problem” spiel, supposedly meant to give us oldtimers goosebumps the way, say, the same tactic did in JJ Abrams’ more deserving Star Trek reboot). It took me about half the movie to notice this, so you can imagine how annoyed I was when I did, lol. This fact alone just makes the entire movie a presumptive a**-hole … it’s just sitting there plain expecting you to buy a ticket to the sequels it’s setting up without even trying to earn its own place on your schedule. If you hadn’t figured it out yet, the movie just annoyed the living pi** out of me, and I was never even that much of a fan of the original. Next please.

Green Zone Green Zone 4 star

July 20th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , , , ,

Let’s just get this out of the way… ahem, Bourne in Iraq cough lol.

I write what I feel on this site, I wouldn’t even bother if I didn’t, so if you know me you’ll know my apprehension about Paul Greengrass and Matt Damon; even if both have done good work on their own, their most popular efforts have been far from their best and sue me if I call it out when great people pander to the crowd. But to my joy this is one of those rare movies that kinda had me at hello. I’m on something of a “calling bullshit” kick lately, goodness knows why, and after a strong opening with way over-the-top incidental score and less nauseating shaky-cam than usual from Paul Greengrass, comes a scene with Matt Damon’s simply calling such bullshit on the search for WMDs that basically made everything that followed fine by me.

The plot’s more complicated in the end than I’d dare to summarise, and I’m often not good with overcomplicated plots where they’re not needed, but it kinda didn’t matter to me here. I did lose interest and it did outstay its welcome, but I felt perfectly able to dip back into the aspect of the movie that initially hooked me quite easily. It’s one of Matt Damon’s more tolerable performances (and for the record I’d limit those previous of his that fully come into this category to the Kevin Smith stuff and The Talented Mr. Ripley) and being Paul Greengrass the tech side is flawless. It’s clearly no Hurt Locker and clearly doesn’t aspire to be. Some will say it oversimplifies what it’s trying to say about this war. I say, relative to most stuff gracing the multiplexes nowadays, at least it has something that needs to be simplified.

The Transporter Trilogy The Transporter Trilogy 3 star

May 24th, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , , , ,

I’ll do as I did with the Crank movies with these and keep them all on one page. It’s likely I never would have watched all three were it not for the temptation of both sequels appearing on Sky HD in the past few weeks. I’d already seen the first one (old short review below) and it didn’t exactly blow me away.

I have to say, I was surprised in many ways. Even the first one seemed better than I remembered today. I still find The Girl (as I’ll call them) in this part to be one of the worst written female characters I’ve ever seen, but I have a lot to say about the sexism/misogyny I perceived that first time around as it comes across through the whole series, especially the third, because it’s definitely more complicated (or, at least, accidentally interesting) than I thought back then.

So, the simple set-up of the first movie is that Jason Statham is The Transporter – a special kind of delivery man, who promises to deliver anything, anywhere, no questions asked. He has various rules of operation like: sticking to the deal, no names, and that he won’t look in the package; but when one of said packages in his trunk moves, he breaks that third rule and finds a Girl in there. As they say, hilarity ensues. Or something like it.

The most interesting thing that happens, as I touched on in my original review and just mentioned, is that this girl – who has presumably been kidnapped, who has only just met Statham, who even we in possession of all the facts still understand as a knowing accomplice (he does not immediately intend to set her free or anything) – pretty… no, too soon… gets naked and falls in love with him. Like, way too quickly. Romantic music starts to play almost the very moment their eyes meet, the girl still bound and gagged in Statham’s trunk. It’s awkward to say the least, and it both surprises and worries me that so few other reviews I’ve read of the movie talk about this particular scene.

But I guess you have to look at the rest of the movie too. It’s not like Statham or any of the male characters in these movies are fair representations of every man on the planet either. Statham’s body is exposed just as much as the girl’s, if not more (I don’t recall, in fact, any really naughty bits of either party being seen, unless the bottom of the girl’s buttocks counts), and as Mark Kermode has recalled many times on his Radio 5 reviews show, he even gets his naked torso covered in oil at one point. If you’re to argue sexism from the women’s side, it has to be said, you have to go the other way too. The guys in these movies are, at times, even dumber than the girls… example, in part two, when Statham and villain are so involved with their own fisticuffs that they fail to realise the plane they’re fighting in is in freefall and both of them will die if one of them doesn’t take the controls…

So, yeah… you have to take the original Transporter and its sequels for what they are… and what they are is pure action with a little good story thrown in. The interesting thing to me now is how much more interesting the series gets as it progresses. I honestly expected the sequels to be almost lifeless retreads of the same or very similar stories, but no, each has it’s own little gimmick; and part 3 in particular even turns on the whole misogyny (if that’s what it is) thing.

Transporter 2 is basically Man on Fire meets Mission: Impossible II. We meet The Transporter again and his job now appears to be driving a rich family’s kid to and from school, but almost as quickly as the mother gets overwhelmed by his sexiness and jumps on him (seriously, she does… quicker than the girl in the original), a villainous plot involving the kid is hatched. The plan is to inject the kid with a bio-engineered virus which kills anyone the infected breathes on over a period of 24 hours. His father is a big anti-drug figure headed for a conference with other anti-drug figures and the idea is to wipe them all out. Oh. They have a Girl on their side who pretty much only wears underwear and shoots two machine guns, too.

The action in part 2 is just as much fun as the first movie, and I have to say I even got a little kick out of how stylised that underwear-clad machine gun girl was. Most of all, as I say, I was just surprised that they put Jason Statham’s character into such a different story for the sequel, even if it does remind me of many other movies.

OK, so we come to part 3, and I must say, I’m surprised to say I think it may be my favourite of the bunch. Transporter 3 again takes the Transporter character and gives him something new to deal with. As in the first movie, he is transporting a person… but the customer here is particularly edgy, and not only refits Statham’s precious car but sticks a bracelet on both driver and cargo’s wrists which, if they stray too far from the vehicle, will cause a pretty large explosion. It’s kind of Speed meets Crank – that other Statham-starring “don’t even try reviewing this” franchise…

What I found most interesting about part 3 is that it reaches a certain stage 30 minutes in where, though Statham has shown his bare chest to The Girl, and The Girl has made slight googoo eyes, she hasn’t yet jumped on him like The Girls of the previous two movies. Minutes after I realised this, it was almost as if the screenwriters realised too, and they promptly have her take drugs and drink alcohol, lowering her inhibitions. Still, she doesn’t jump on him. Instead, even later still, she accuses him of being gay for not jumping on her, which he denies, saying, “Did it ever occur to you I might not be in the mood?” (Seriously.) – then she takes the car keys, strays to a dangerous distance from the vehicle (remember the bracelets), and forces him to strip for her in exchange for the keys.

There’s still for sure a wet dreamy nature to this scene that can be read as inappropriate. But, I don’t know, it’s like I said, it just seems there’s something else going on here with the sexism/misogyny/whatever you wanna call it that isn’t quite as easily dismissed as you might want it to be in a movie of this kind. It does work, to a point at least, both ways, and that not only makes part 3 more interesting to me than the others, but it even makes both previous parts more interesting than they were… something very few sequels can claim to do. The actress playing The Girl in part 3 is almost as bad (and her dialogue as insultingly written) as the one in the first movie, but Statham has come a long way as an action star, he has much more presence. There’s something just feels more right to me in the latest part which kind of makes watching the whole trilogy in one sitting, as I did here, strangely more rewarding than it ought to be. These movies really aren’t too bad at all, and I’d probably be interested in a fourth. I still don’t know if I’ve got what I wanted to say even clear in my head let alone in what I’ve written, but that in itself to me kind of speaks well for the movies if they can make me ponder so much about a character. I find the guy interesting… and in movies like this, that’s more than you should expect.


December 5th, 2005:

Luc Besson’s mark is kinda all over this one though he only co-wrote and produced. It tires a little toward the end (though I admit I was a little tired for other reasons too), and I’ve gotta say I think it’s maybe a little too misogynistic, some people are gonna have major problems connecting to the hero and the heroine – she does open her legs a little too fast for him after everything he does. But otherwise I kind of enjoyed it.

Kick-Ass Kick-Ass 5 star

April 1st, 2010 by surlaroute

Tags: , , , ,

I wasn’t that interested in seeing this movie till I saw the “red band” Hit Girl trailer which ticked, I’m not ashamed to say, pretty much all my boxes. I’d seen Chloe Moretz in a couple of small roles like the Amityville remake, Wicked Little Things (neither of which I can honestly recall her in) and most recently 500 Days of Summer, but she hadn’t really struck me yet as being among those who are worth watching anything exclusively for. Here, however, with bright purple hair, swearing like (actually, worse than) a sailor, with knives and guns, we have a new icon in the history of controversial young girls in movies… possibly the most memorable since Natalie Portman did a few similar things in The Professional 16 years ago. I start with this just so you know where ultimately my 5-heart rating for this movie is coming from. I adore Hit Girl. She has the best movie entrance since Jack Sparrow in the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie, and it only gets better from there on out.

Kick-Ass, however, is far from being all about Hit Girl, and I was surprised to find all of its other elements just as appealing, appalling, surprising and enthralling as the one thing I could be sure of not being a letdown. Enthusiastic praise began to appear on Twitter etc in the past couple of weeks with many declaring it as “best superhero movie ever” etc and my response was pretty much “I doubt it.” It looked too silly for that no matter which way I looked at it, even despite the very encouraging Hit Girl stuff. On the other side were discussions like that on the BBC’s Review Show where stuffy art people tried to find an anti-violence message in the movie and found one only marred by the very way the movie revels in its own violence. Even I, who prefer my movies to have substance, knew that this was a movie more than anything designed to purely entertain, and I was happy to accept it as such (provided there was plenty of Hit Girl – which there is).

So it surprised me how involved I got with the whole thing as the story progressed. The point of this movie, if you’re unaware of the set-up, is that more than any superhero movie to date it is relentlessly grounded in our reality. The movie opens with a would-be hero standing atop a skyscraper viewed by a very “is it a bird? is it a plane?” type crowd, diving off majestically… and smashing head first into a car on the street below. The eponymous hero Kick-Ass’ first encounter with bad guys results in his being horribly (and I mean horribly) wounded and hospitalized. Even Hit Girl doesn’t escape the movie without sustaining injuries that painfully jolt you into remembering that beneath it all she’s “just” an 11 year old girl. The answer the film proposes to its question “why doesn’t anybody ever make themselves a superhero suit and fight crime?” seems almost certainly to be exactly that offered by a side character early on, “because it’s crazy!” … but you still leave the movie wanting to be either Kick-Ass himself, Red Mist, Hit Girl or Big Daddy (go on guess which one I wannabe), because the morality of such a move is so perfectly, not to mention entertainingly, delivered.

I won’t be calling it the best superhero movie I’ve ever seen or anything, because I don’t know how to make that call on a genre that becomes more diverse, exemplified hugely by Kick-Ass, with every new entry. What it is is a thoroughly satisfying whole that is far far greater than the sum of its sometimes disjointed parts. It made me laugh, it made me cry, it had my eyes glued to the screen and made me want to look away. Like I said I was really only there for Hit Girl but without her that 5-heart rating would likely only lose one point. It’s a great movie which probably has something for everyone. It’s certainly a great start to my movie year.

Death Race Death Race 3 star

December 5th, 2008 by surlaroute

Tags: , ,

One can’t complain too much about this one at all – I personally kinda got a little excited when I discovered Ian McShane and Joan Allen were in it. I haven’t seen the original Roger Corman movie yet so my nearest point of reference would be something like Running Man combined with Logan’s Run, the former of which at least it doesn’t stand up badly to at all – it’s certainly more fun than Doomsday (read: less hateful and childish) and I imagine on the big screen it was even better. Ian McShane isn’t in it nearly enough, but Joan Allen more than makes up for it. Her presence reminds me of the great stupid action movies of the 90s like Face / Off and The Rock that I loved (and love) so much – and while this isn’t anywhere near comparable to the likes of those, for this decade’s lousy record it’s possibly the best one can hope for.