<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wicker Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ambival.net/movies/wicker-park/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ambival.net/movies/wicker-park</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movies &#187; Lucky Number Slevin</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/wicker-park#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movies &#187; Lucky Number Slevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=150#comment-385</guid>
		<description>[...] Noticing that this one was directed by Paul McGuigan, who directed Wicker Park &#8211; which I loved, but still need a number more viewings to get my head entirely arond &#8211; I knew I might need patience to get through it. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, it lost me well within the first 10 minutes. The movie is quality, for sure, and like Inside Man it has an impressive cast. But its seeming sheer perfection is almost ultimately boring; the convoluted plot doesn&#8217;t help, even for a viewer who&#8217;s prepared for a last minute, revelatory, &#8220;OH so THAT&#8217;s what it meant!&#8221; à la Wicker Park; and ultimately the whole thing long outstays its welcome. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Noticing that this one was directed by Paul McGuigan, who directed Wicker Park &#8211; which I loved, but still need a number more viewings to get my head entirely arond &#8211; I knew I might need patience to get through it. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, it lost me well within the first 10 minutes. The movie is quality, for sure, and like Inside Man it has an impressive cast. But its seeming sheer perfection is almost ultimately boring; the convoluted plot doesn&#8217;t help, even for a viewer who&#8217;s prepared for a last minute, revelatory, &#8220;OH so THAT&#8217;s what it meant!&#8221; à la Wicker Park; and ultimately the whole thing long outstays its welcome. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
