<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True Romance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ambival.net/movies/true-romance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ambival.net/movies/true-romance</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Deja Vu [2006]</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/true-romance#comment-7175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Deja Vu [2006]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=96#comment-7175</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s hints early on at the brilliant potential for this movie to address love that transcends even time itself &#8211; and that&#8217;s the only reason, ultimately, it takes a slight downturn for me when Denzel goes back in time. It kind of breaks that whole potential. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, this moment is done as brilliantly as the rest, I completely accepted it and it doesn&#8217;t come over as too bizarre a turn, not even the way some people (not me) find The Prestige stuff does &#8230; but for me, the idea of someone falling in love, even just getting close, getting a connection to a person, without ever having met them, that deserves more and those shots where it looks like the girl &#8220;feels&#8221; Denzel watching her early on are just too tantalising for the rest of the movie to live up to. And, I know, I know, it&#8217;s not that kind of movie, it&#8217;s &#8220;just&#8221; a thriller, but if you&#8217;ve seen Man on Fire, or even True Romance you&#8217;ll know Tony Scott is capable of making a thriller so much more than a thriller, and it could&#8217;ve been both. The ending pulls this feeling back big time, I for one did not see it coming at all and when I realised what was going to happen, I primed myself for tears and they came on cue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s hints early on at the brilliant potential for this movie to address love that transcends even time itself &#8211; and that&#8217;s the only reason, ultimately, it takes a slight downturn for me when Denzel goes back in time. It kind of breaks that whole potential. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, this moment is done as brilliantly as the rest, I completely accepted it and it doesn&#8217;t come over as too bizarre a turn, not even the way some people (not me) find The Prestige stuff does &#8230; but for me, the idea of someone falling in love, even just getting close, getting a connection to a person, without ever having met them, that deserves more and those shots where it looks like the girl &#8220;feels&#8221; Denzel watching her early on are just too tantalising for the rest of the movie to live up to. And, I know, I know, it&#8217;s not that kind of movie, it&#8217;s &#8220;just&#8221; a thriller, but if you&#8217;ve seen Man on Fire, or even True Romance you&#8217;ll know Tony Scott is capable of making a thriller so much more than a thriller, and it could&#8217;ve been both. The ending pulls this feeling back big time, I for one did not see it coming at all and when I realised what was going to happen, I primed myself for tears and they came on cue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
