<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Exorcist (: The Version You&#8217;ve Never Seen)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ambival.net/movies/the-exorcist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ambival.net/movies/the-exorcist</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Amityville II: The Possession</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/the-exorcist#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Amityville II: The Possession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=236#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>[...] In the end, to put it at its worst, it&#8217;s a really shameful rip off of The Exorcist &#8211; I mean, anyone who would deny that the director is obviously so enamoured of William Friedkin and William Peter Blatty&#8217;s creation that he decided to simply try and recreate every single base element of it needs their head examined, lol. The obviousness of this fact is astoundingly silly at times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the end, to put it at its worst, it&#8217;s a really shameful rip off of The Exorcist &#8211; I mean, anyone who would deny that the director is obviously so enamoured of William Friedkin and William Peter Blatty&#8217;s creation that he decided to simply try and recreate every single base element of it needs their head examined, lol. The obviousness of this fact is astoundingly silly at times. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; My Top 100 Movies [current]</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/the-exorcist#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; My Top 100 Movies [current]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=236#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>[...] The Exorcist: The Version You&#8217;ve Never Seen William Friedkin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Exorcist: The Version You&#8217;ve Never Seen William Friedkin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Journal &#187; Wanna Cookie? and Halloween! and &#8230; and Stuff! lol</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/the-exorcist#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Journal &#187; Wanna Cookie? and Halloween! and &#8230; and Stuff! lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=236#comment-990</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ll likely throw in The Exorcist, of course, and Happy Birthday to Me, and all this is still at the mercy of the TV schedules which are sometimes surprisingly good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll likely throw in The Exorcist, of course, and Happy Birthday to Me, and all this is still at the mercy of the TV schedules which are sometimes surprisingly good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movies &#187; The Bad Seed [1956]</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/the-exorcist#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movies &#187; The Bad Seed [1956]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=236#comment-577</guid>
		<description>[...] Double/triple-bill comments &#8211; you could go the obvious route on this one and watch other crazy children movies like The Exorcist, The Omen, or Village of the Damned. But I&#8217;m more inclined to put it with Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? &#8211; for the unexpected horror to be found in old cinema; Todd Haynes&#8217; Douglas Sirk infection, Far From Heaven, where homosexuality is regarded with as much fear almost as Rhoda here; or maybe Paul Schrader&#8217;s Auto-Focus. Unorthodox suggestions, maybe, but that&#8217;s just what came to mind while watching. I guess I&#8217;m a little hooked on the image of a sinister worm eating away at the idealistic decade. Hmm, that image rings a bell &#8230; maybe it is time for a remake afterall? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Double/triple-bill comments &#8211; you could go the obvious route on this one and watch other crazy children movies like The Exorcist, The Omen, or Village of the Damned. But I&#8217;m more inclined to put it with Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? &#8211; for the unexpected horror to be found in old cinema; Todd Haynes&#8217; Douglas Sirk infection, Far From Heaven, where homosexuality is regarded with as much fear almost as Rhoda here; or maybe Paul Schrader&#8217;s Auto-Focus. Unorthodox suggestions, maybe, but that&#8217;s just what came to mind while watching. I guess I&#8217;m a little hooked on the image of a sinister worm eating away at the idealistic decade. Hmm, that image rings a bell &#8230; maybe it is time for a remake afterall? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
