<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunshine [2007]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ambival.net/movies/sunshine-2007/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ambival.net/movies/sunshine-2007</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/sunshine-2007#comment-19568</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/movies/sunshine-2007#comment-19568</guid>
		<description>I didn't go with it. Please don't compare dilettante Boyle to Kubrick. It's like comparing a wading pool to Lake Superior. You got fooled by the "pretty-pretty" in "Sunshine"; the script is shallow, derivative, and thoroughly reliant on stupidity and implausibility for its drama, and Boyle pulls out every cheap camera trick at his disposal to cover the weaknesses in the story he's trying to tell. If he'd had a decent screenplay from which to work, things might have turned out okay, but Alex Garland is too busy concentrating on big, lofty ideas to provide a logical narrative or sympathetic characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t go with it. Please don&#8217;t compare dilettante Boyle to Kubrick. It&#8217;s like comparing a wading pool to Lake Superior. You got fooled by the &#8220;pretty-pretty&#8221; in &#8220;Sunshine&#8221;; the script is shallow, derivative, and thoroughly reliant on stupidity and implausibility for its drama, and Boyle pulls out every cheap camera trick at his disposal to cover the weaknesses in the story he&#8217;s trying to tell. If he&#8217;d had a decent screenplay from which to work, things might have turned out okay, but Alex Garland is too busy concentrating on big, lofty ideas to provide a logical narrative or sympathetic characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
