Sunshine [2007]

Sunshine [2007] 5 star

Kind of like Meet the Robinsons, there was actually a long stretch here that I look back on now bewildered, where I was just absolutely gobsmacked about how stupid a turn the movie had taken. If you’ve seen the movie you’ll know where – if you haven’t, you’ll know when you see it … I’m not gonna spoil it. Just to say, you’ll either go with it or not. I’m glad to say I went.

Like last year’s The Prestige and moreso The Fountain this just sits leagues above anything else I’ve seen this year so far, and I won’t be able to explain exactly why until I’ve seen it at least a few more times – though, maybe that’s why … because it’s not a movie whose beauty can be put into words (... that’s why it’s a movie …) I said reviewing Millions how Danny Boyle is about the most consistently brilliant director working today, and the guy doesn’t make it easy on himself changing genre with every production. I think what I said there is still an understatement. People have compared this movie (favourably and otherwise) to Kubrick’s 2001. Kubrick also changed genre with every movie. Honestly – if anyone out there is wondering who’s filling Stanley’s boots these days … allow me to nominate this guy.


One Response to “Sunshine [2007]”

  1. Doug Says:

    I didn’t go with it. Please don’t compare dilettante Boyle to Kubrick. It’s like comparing a wading pool to Lake Superior. You got fooled by the “pretty-pretty” in “Sunshine”; the script is shallow, derivative, and thoroughly reliant on stupidity and implausibility for its drama, and Boyle pulls out every cheap camera trick at his disposal to cover the weaknesses in the story he’s trying to tell. If he’d had a decent screenplay from which to work, things might have turned out okay, but Alex Garland is too busy concentrating on big, lofty ideas to provide a logical narrative or sympathetic characters.

Leave a Reply