<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MirrorMask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ambival.net/movies/mirrormask/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ambival.net/movies/mirrormask</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Tideland</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/mirrormask#comment-10786</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Tideland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=672#comment-10786</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;ll sit nicely alongside movies such as Paperhouse, Mirrormask, Labyrinth, and, I&#8217;m guessing, Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth (haven&#8217;t seen that yet, will do soon, but I get the impression it&#8217;s pretty similar stuff); and really, no matter what you think of it, I can&#8217;t understand how anybody could call it terrible, as the aesthetic values alone, as in any Terry Gilliam production, are worth the price of admission. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;ll sit nicely alongside movies such as Paperhouse, Mirrormask, Labyrinth, and, I&#8217;m guessing, Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth (haven&#8217;t seen that yet, will do soon, but I get the impression it&#8217;s pretty similar stuff); and really, no matter what you think of it, I can&#8217;t understand how anybody could call it terrible, as the aesthetic values alone, as in any Terry Gilliam production, are worth the price of admission. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; My Top 100 Movies [current]</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/mirrormask#comment-10701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; My Top 100 Movies [current]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=672#comment-10701</guid>
		<description>[...] MirrorMask Dave McKean [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MirrorMask Dave McKean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Journal &#187; Cool things</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/mirrormask#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Journal &#187; Cool things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=672#comment-573</guid>
		<description>[...] Terry Gilliam&#8217;s Tideland &#8211; looks like a mash of Paperhouse, MirrorMask and Lawn Dogs ... in other words, beautiful, and it&#8217;s good to know that a movie like this will be floating around when Dakota Fanning&#8217;s Hounddog comes out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Terry Gilliam&#8217;s Tideland &#8211; looks like a mash of Paperhouse, MirrorMask and Lawn Dogs &#8230; in other words, beautiful, and it&#8217;s good to know that a movie like this will be floating around when Dakota Fanning&#8217;s Hounddog comes out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2005 Movies</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/mirrormask#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2005 Movies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/?p=672#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] MirrorMask Dave McKean [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MirrorMask Dave McKean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
