<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man on Fire [1987]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ambival.net/movies/man-on-fire-1987/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ambival.net/movies/man-on-fire-1987</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Infernal Affairs I</title>
		<link>http://ambival.net/movies/man-on-fire-1987#comment-10469</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambival.net &#187; Movie Reviews &#187; Infernal Affairs I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ambival.net/movies/man-on-fire-1987#comment-10469</guid>
		<description>[...] As with the &#8216;87 Man on Fire, I was initially surprised by how much this original resembled its remake (The Departed) not just in content but also in style. I even had the same panic I had on my first viewing of The Departed &#8211; in the first half, that I&#8217;d completely lost the plot &#8211; this even, again similar to the &#8220;Man on Fire&#8221; situation, when I pretty much already know the story, lol. As with Scorsese&#8217;s movie, though, it all falls neatly into pleasant focus by the end, with really only a few differences on the way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As with the &#8216;87 Man on Fire, I was initially surprised by how much this original resembled its remake (The Departed) not just in content but also in style. I even had the same panic I had on my first viewing of The Departed &#8211; in the first half, that I&#8217;d completely lost the plot &#8211; this even, again similar to the &#8220;Man on Fire&#8221; situation, when I pretty much already know the story, lol. As with Scorsese&#8217;s movie, though, it all falls neatly into pleasant focus by the end, with really only a few differences on the way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
